e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
þ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009
OR
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to
Commission File
No. 1-7819
Analog Devices, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2348234
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
One Technology Way, Norwood, MA
|
|
02062-9106
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(781)
329-4700
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock
$0.162/3
Par Value
|
|
New York Stock
Exchange
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which
Registered
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Title
of Class
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files.) YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately
$5,181,000,000 based on the last reported sale of the Common
Stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape reporting
system on May 2, 2009. Shares of voting and non-voting
stock beneficially owned by executive officers, directors and
holders of more than 5% of the outstanding stock have been
excluded from this calculation because such persons or
institutions may be deemed affiliates. This determination of
affiliate status is not a conclusive determination for other
purposes.
As of October 31, 2009 there were 291,861,767 shares
of Common Stock,
$0.162/3
par value per share, outstanding.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Document Description
|
|
Form 10-K Part
|
|
|
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held
March 9, 2010
|
|
|
III
|
|
PART I
Company
Overview
We are a world leader in the design, manufacture and marketing
of high-performance analog, mixed-signal and digital signal
processing integrated circuits used in industrial,
communication, computer and consumer applications. Since our
inception in 1965, we have focused on solving the engineering
challenges associated with signal processing in electronic
equipment. Our signal processing products translate real-world
phenomena such as light, sound, temperature, motion and pressure
into electrical signals to be used in a wide array of electronic
equipment. Used by over 60,000 customers worldwide, our products
are embedded inside many types of electronic equipment including:
|
|
|
Industrial process controls
Factory automation systems
Instrumentation
Energy management systems
Defense electronics
Automobiles
Medical imaging equipment
|
|
Portable wireless communications devices
Cellular basestations
Central office networking equipment
Computers
Digital cameras
Digital televisions
|
Signal processing technology is a critical element of
industrial, high-speed communications and consumer applications.
As new generations of digital applications evolve, they generate
new needs for high-performance analog signal processing and
digital signal processing, or DSP, technology. We produce a wide
range of products that are designed to meet the signal
processing technology needs of a broad base of customers. The
breakdown of our fiscal 2009 revenue by end market is set out in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Total FY2009 ADI
|
End Market
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Computer
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
We sell our products worldwide through a direct sales force,
third-party distributors and independent sales representatives
and through our website. We have direct sales offices in 17
countries, including the United States.
We are headquartered near Boston, in Norwood, Massachusetts, and
have manufacturing facilities in Massachusetts, Ireland and the
Philippines. We were founded in 1965 and are incorporated in
Massachusetts. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol ADI and is included in the
Standard & Poors 500 Index.
We maintain a website with the address www.analog.com. We are
not including the information contained on our website as a part
of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We make available free of charge through our website our Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K
(including exhibits), and amendments to these reports, as soon
as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission. We also make available on our website our
corporate governance guidelines, the charters for our audit
committee, compensation committee, and nominating and corporate
governance committee, our stock option granting policies, our
code of business conduct and ethics which applies to our
directors, officers and employees, and our related person
transaction policy, and such information is available in print
and free of charge to any shareholder of Analog Devices who
requests it. In addition, we intend to disclose on our website
any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of business conduct
and ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant
to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the New
York Stock Exchange.
1
Industry
Background
All electronic signals fall into one of two categories, analog
or digital. Analog signals, also known as linear signals,
represent real-world phenomena, such as temperature, pressure,
sound, speed and motion. This information can be detected and
measured using analog sensors by generating continuously-varying
voltages and currents. The signals from these sensors are
initially processed using analog methods, such as amplification,
filtering and shaping. They are then usually converted to
digital form for storage or further manipulation. The further
manipulation of the signals after conversion to digital form is
called digital signal processing. Digital signals
represent the ones and zeros of binary
arithmetic and are either on or off. Digital signals are
frequently converted back to analog form for functions such as
video display, audio output or control. We refer to these
manipulations and transformations as real-world signal
processing.
Significant developments in semiconductor technology in recent
years have substantially increased the performance and
functionality of integrated circuits, or ICs, used in signal
processing applications. These developments include:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to combine analog and digital signal processing
capability on a single chip, thereby making possible more
highly-integrated solutions; and
|
|
|
|
the widespread application of low-cost, high-performance
microprocessor-based systems, which allows customers to convert
analog information into digital information that can be managed
by these microprocessors.
|
Principal
Products
We design, manufacture and market a broad line of
high-performance ICs that incorporate analog, mixed-signal and
digital signal processing technologies. Our ICs are designed to
address a wide range of real-world signal processing
applications. Across the entire range of our product portfolio
are both general-purpose products used by a broad range of
customers and applications as well as application-specific
products designed for specific clusters of customers in key
target markets. By using readily available, high-performance,
general-purpose products in their systems, our customers can
reduce the time they need to bring new products to market. Given
the high cost of developing more customized ICs, our standard
products often provide a cost-effective solution for many low to
medium volume applications. However, in some industrial,
communications, consumer and computer products, we focus on
working with leading customers to design application-specific
solutions. We begin with our existing core technologies in data
conversion, amplification, power management, radio frequency and
DSP, and devise a solution to more closely meet the needs of a
specific customer or group of customers. Because we have already
developed the core technology for our general-purpose products,
we can create application-specific solutions quickly.
We produce and market several thousand products and operate in
one reporting segment. Our ten highest revenue products, in the
aggregate, accounted for approximately 9% of our revenue for
fiscal 2009. The majority of our products are proprietary,
meaning equivalent products are not available from competitors.
A limited number of other companies may provide products with
similar functions. A breakdown of our fiscal 2009 revenue by
product category follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Total FY2009 ADI
|
Product Category
|
|
Revenue *
|
|
Converters
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Amplifiers
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Other analog
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Power management & reference
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
DSP
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The sum of the individual percentages do not equal 100% due to
rounding. |
2
Analog
Products
Our analog IC technology has been the foundation of our business
for over four decades, and we believe we are one of the
worlds largest suppliers of high-performance analog ICs.
Our analog signal processing ICs are primarily high-performance
devices, generally defined as devices that support a minimum of
10-bits of accuracy and a minimum of 50 megahertz of speed. The
principal advantages these products have versus
competitors products include higher accuracy, lower cost
per function, smaller size, lower power consumption and fewer
components resulting in improved reliability. The majority of
our analog IC products are proprietary to us in their design and
our product portfolio addresses a wide range of applications.
Our product portfolio includes several thousand analog ICs, any
one of which can have as many as several hundred customers. Our
analog ICs typically have long product life cycles. Our analog
IC customers include both original equipment manufacturers, or
OEMs, and customers who build electronic subsystems for
integration into larger systems.
We derive the majority of our analog signal processing IC
product revenue from sales of data converters and amplifiers. We
are the industrys leading supplier of data converter
products. Data converters translate real-world analog signals
into digital data and also translate digital data into analog
signals. Data converters remain our largest and most diverse
product family and an area where we are continuously innovating
to enable our customers to redefine and differentiate their
products. With the industrys leading portfolio of ADCs
(analog-to-digital
converters) and DACs
(digital-to-analog
converters), our converter products combine sampling rates and
accuracy with the low noise, power, price and small package size
required by industrial, medical, automotive, communications, and
consumer electronics. We are also a leading supplier of
high-performance amplifiers. Amplifiers are used to condition
analog signals and minimize noise. We provide high speed,
precision, RF, broadband, instrumentation and other amplifiers.
We also offer an extensive portfolio of comparators that are
used in a wide variety of applications.
Our analog technology also includes the broadest portfolio of RF
ICs covering the entire RF signal chain from industry-leading
high performance RF function blocks to highly integrated WI-MAX
and short-range single chip transceiver solutions. To date, we
have sold our RF ICs principally for cellular infrastructure and
point-to-point
applications and have been focused on the high performance end
of the market.
Our analog technology portfolio also includes products using an
advanced IC technology known in the industry as surface
micromachining, which is used to produce semiconductor products
known as micro-electromechanical systems, or MEMS. This
technology enables us to build extremely small mechanical
sensing elements on the surface of a chip along with supporting
circuitry. In addition to incorporating an electro-mechanical
structure, these devices also have analog circuitry for
conditioning signals obtained from the sensing element. The
integration of signal conditioning and MEMS is a unique feature
of our products which we call
iMEMS®.
Our iMEMS product portfolio includes accelerometers used to
sense acceleration, gyroscopes used to sense rotation, and MEMS
microphones used to capture audio sounds. The majority of our
current revenue from MEMS products is derived from automotive
manufacturers and consumer customers.
Power management and reference products make up the balance of
our analog sales. Whether the product is plugged into the wall
or runs on batteries, every electronic device requires some form
of power management, which can include converters, battery
chargers, charge pumps, and regulators. We leverage our leading
analog signal technology to devise innovative high-performance
power management ICs, high-reliability infrastructure equipment
and battery-operated portable medical, communications and
consumer devices.
Digital
Signal Processing Products
Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) complete our product portfolio.
DSPs are optimized for high-speed numeric calculations, which
are essential for instantaneous, or real-time, processing of
digital data generated, in most cases, from analog to digital
signal conversion. Our DSP products are designed to be fully
programmable and to efficiently execute specialized software
programs, or algorithms, associated with processing digitized
real-time, real-world data. Programmable DSPs provide the
flexibility to modify the devices function quickly and
inexpensively using software. Our general-purpose DSP IC
customers typically write their own algorithms using software
development tools that we provide and software development tools
they obtain from third-party suppliers. Our DSPs are designed in
families of products that share a common architecture and
therefore can execute the same software. We support
3
these products with easy-to-use, low-cost development tools,
which are designed to reduce our customers product
development costs and
time-to-market.
Markets
and Applications
The following describes some of the characteristics of, and
customer products within, our major markets:
Industrial Our industrial market
includes the following areas:
Industrial Process Automation Our industrial
process automation market includes applications, such as:
|
|
|
Factory automation systems
Automatic process control systems
Robotics
|
|
Environmental control systems
Automatic test equipment
|
These applications generally require ICs that offer performance
greater than that available from commodity-level ICs but
generally do not have production volumes that warrant custom or
application-specific ICs. Combinations of analog, mixed-signal
and DSP ICs are usually employed to achieve the necessary
functionality.
Instrumentation Our instrumentation market
includes engineering, medical and scientific instruments. These
applications are usually designed using the highest performance
analog and mixed-signal ICs available. Customer products include:
|
|
|
Oscilloscopes
Logic analyzers
CT scanners
|
|
MRI equipment
Blood analyzers
Microscopes
|
Defense/Aerospace The defense, commercial
avionics and space markets all require high-performance ICs that
meet rigorous environmental and reliability specifications. Many
of our analog ICs can be supplied in versions that meet these
standards. In addition, many products can be supplied to meet
the standards required for broadcast satellites and other
commercial space applications. Most of our products sold in this
market are specifically tested versions of products derived from
our standard product offering. Customer products include:
|
|
|
Navigation systems
Flight simulators
|
|
Radar systems
Security devices
|
Automotive The automotive industry relies on
electronics to bring differentiated features to market quickly.
As a result, electronic equipment content is continuing to
increase as a percentage of total vehicle cost. In the
automotive market, we have achieved significant market
penetration through collaboration with manufacturers worldwide
to drive innovation in three key areas: safety systems, power
train electronics, and infotainment (which includes
entertainment, communications and navigation systems). We offer
a wide portfolio of analog ICs used in powertrain and body
electronics applications to help improve fuel efficiency and
lower emissions. We have developed products specifically for the
automotive market which are used in such applications as:
|
|
|
Crash sensors in airbag systems
Roll-over sensing
Global positioning satellite (GPS)
Automotive navigation systems
Anti-lock brakes
|
|
Smart suspension systems
Engine control
In-cabin electronics
Audio
Collision avoidance systems
|
Energy Management The need to improve
energy efficiency, conservation, reliability, and cleanliness is
driving investments in renewable energy, power transmission and
distribution systems, electric meters, and other innovative
areas. The common characteristic behind these efforts is the
addition of sensing, measurement, and
4
communication technologies to electrical infrastructure. Our
offerings include both standard and application-specific
products and are used in applications such as:
|
|
|
Electric meters
Meter communication modules
Substation relays and automation equipment
|
|
Wind turbines
Solar inverters
Building energy automation/control
|
Communications The development of
broadband, wireless and Internet infrastructures around the
world has created an important market for our communications
products. Communications technology involves the acquisition of
analog signals that are converted from analog to digital and
digital to analog form during the process of transmitting and
receiving data. The need for higher speed and reduced power
consumption, coupled with more reliable, bandwidth-efficient
communications, has been creating demand for our products. Our
products are used in the full spectrum of signal processing for
audio, data, image and video communication. In wireless and
broadband communication applications, our products are
incorporated into:
|
|
|
Cellular handsets
Cellular basestation equipment
PBX switches
|
|
Routers
Remote access servers
|
Consumer Market demand for digital
entertainment systems and the consumer demand for high quality
voice, music, movies and photographs have allowed us to combine
analog and digital design capability to provide solutions that
meet the rigorous cost requirements of the consumer electronics
market. The emergence of high-performance, feature-rich consumer
products has created a market for our high-performance ICs with
a high level of specific functionality. These products include:
|
|
|
Digital camcorders and cameras
Home theater systems
LCD digital televisions
|
|
Video projectors
Portable media devices
High-definition DVD recorders/players
|
Computer Revenues from computer
customers now comprise only a small percentage of our total
revenue given the limited opportunity for high performance
signal processing technology in this market.
Research
and Development
Our markets are characterized by rapid technological changes and
advances. Accordingly, we make substantial investments in the
design and development of new products and manufacturing
processes, and the improvement of existing products and
manufacturing processes. We spent approximately
$447 million during fiscal 2009 on the design, development
and improvement of new and existing products and manufacturing
processes, compared to approximately $533 million during
fiscal 2008 and approximately $510 million during fiscal
2007.
Our research and development strategy focuses on building
technical leadership in core technologies of converters, linear,
including amplifiers, and Radio Frequency (RF) technology, power
management, sensors, and digital signal processing. In support
of our research and development activities, we employ thousands
of engineers involved in product and manufacturing process
development at 34 design centers and manufacturing sites located
throughout the world.
Patents
and Other Intellectual Property Rights
We seek to establish and maintain our proprietary rights in our
technology and products through the use of patents, copyrights,
trademarks and trade secret laws. We have a program to file
applications for and obtain patents, copyrights and trademarks
in the United States and in selected foreign countries where we
believe filing for such protection is appropriate. We also seek
to maintain our trade secrets and confidential information by
nondisclosure policies and through the use of appropriate
confidentiality agreements. We have obtained a substantial
number of patents and trademarks in the United States and in
other countries. As of October 31, 2009, we held
approximately 1,499 U.S. patents and approximately 604
non-provisional pending U.S. patent applications. There can
be no assurance, however, that the rights obtained can be
successfully enforced against infringing products in every
5
jurisdiction. While our patents, copyrights, trademarks and
trade secrets provide some advantage and protection, we believe
our competitive position and future success is largely
determined by such factors as the system and application
knowledge, innovative skills, technological expertise and
management ability and experience of our personnel; the range
and success of new products being developed by us; our market
brand recognition and ongoing marketing efforts; and customer
service and technical support. It is generally our policy to
seek patent protection for significant inventions that may be
patented, though we may elect, in certain cases, not to seek
patent protection even for significant inventions, if we
determine other protection, such as maintaining the invention as
a trade secret, to be more advantageous. We also have trademarks
that are used in the conduct of our business to distinguish
genuine Analog Devices products and we maintain cooperative
advertising programs to promote our brands and identify products
containing genuine Analog Devices components. In addition, we
have registered certain of our mask sets, which are akin to the
blueprint for building an IC, under the Semiconductor Chip
Protection Act of 1984.
Sales
Channels
We sell our products globally through a direct sales force,
third-party distributors, independent sales representatives and
via our website.
We derived approximately 54% of our fiscal 2009 product revenue
from sales made through distributors. These distributors
typically maintain an inventory of our products. Some of them
also sell products which compete with our products, including
those for which we are an alternate source. In all regions of
the world, we defer revenue and the related cost of sales on
shipments to distributors until the distributors resell the
products to their customers. We make sales to distributors under
agreements that allow distributors to receive price adjustment
credits and to return qualifying products for credit, as
determined by us, in order to reduce the amounts of slow-moving,
discontinued or obsolete product from their inventory. These
agreements limit such returns to a certain percentage of our
shipments to that distributor during the prior quarter. In
addition, distributors are allowed to return unsold products if
we terminate the relationship with the distributor. Additional
information relating to our sales to distributors is set forth
in Note 2n. in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The categorization of sales into geographic regions set forth
below is based upon the location of the customer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Area
|
|
% of 2009 Revenue
|
|
Direct Sales Offices
|
|
United States
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
|
Rest of North/South America
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
|
China
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
Rest of Asia
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
|
We also have sales representatives
and/or
distributors in over 40 countries outside North America,
including countries where we also have direct sales offices. For
further detail regarding revenue and financial information about
our industry, segment and geographic areas, see our Consolidated
Financial Statements and Note 4 in the related Notes
contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We support our worldwide technical direct field sales efforts by
an extensive promotional program that includes editorial
coverage and paid advertising in trade publications, direct mail
programs, promotional brochures, technical seminars and
participation in trade shows. We publish and distribute product
catalogs, applications guides, technical handbooks and detailed
data sheets for individual products. We also provide this
information and sell products via our website. We maintain a
staff of field application engineers who aid customers in
incorporating our products into their products.
We have tens of thousands of customers worldwide. Our largest
single customer, excluding distributors, represented
approximately 5% of our fiscal 2009 revenue. Our 20 largest
customers, excluding distributors, accounted for approximately
37% of our fiscal 2009 revenue. These customers used hundreds of
different types of our products in a wide range of applications
spanning the industrial, communication, consumer and computer
markets.
6
Seasonality
Sales to customers during our first fiscal quarter may be lower
than other quarters due to plant shutdowns at some of our
customers during the holiday season. In general, the seasonality
for any specific period of time has not had a material impact on
our results of operations. In addition, as explained in our risk
factors included elsewhere in this report, our revenue is more
likely to be influenced on a quarter to quarter basis by
cyclicality in the semiconductor industry.
Foreign
Operations
Through subsidiaries and affiliates, we conduct business in
numerous countries outside the United States. During fiscal
2009, we derived approximately 80% of our revenue from customers
in international markets. Our international business is subject
to risks customarily encountered in foreign operations,
including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and
controls, import and export controls, and other laws, policies
and regulations of foreign governments. Although we engage in
hedging transactions to reduce our exposure to currency exchange
rate fluctuations, our competitive position may be adversely
affected by changes in the exchange rate of the United States
dollar against other currencies.
Production
and Raw Materials
Monolithic integrated circuit components are manufactured in a
sequence of semiconductor production steps that include wafer
fabrication, wafer testing, cutting the wafer into individual
chips, or dice, assembly of the dice into packages
and electrical testing of the devices in final packaged form.
The raw materials used to manufacture these devices include
silicon wafers, processing chemicals (including liquefied
gases), precious metals and ceramic and plastic used for
packaging.
We develop and employ a wide variety of proprietary
manufacturing processes that are specifically tailored for use
in fabricating high-performance analog, DSP, mixed-signal and
MEMS ICs. We also use bipolar and complementary metal-oxide
semiconductor, or CMOS, wafer fabrication processes.
Our IC products are fabricated both at our production facilities
and by third-party wafer fabricators. Our products are
manufactured in our own wafer fabrication facilities using
proprietary processes and at third-party wafer-fabrication
foundries using
sub-micron
digital CMOS processes. Approximately 49%, 44% and 43% of our
revenue in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was from
products fabricated at third-party wafer-fabrication facilities,
primarily Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). We
operate wafer fabrication facilities in Wilmington,
Massachusetts and Limerick, Ireland. We closed our wafer
fabrication facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts at the end of
fiscal 2009. We also operate test facilities located in the
Philippines and use third-party subcontractors for the assembly
and testing of our products.
Capital spending was $56.1 million in fiscal 2009, compared
with $157.4 million in fiscal 2008. We currently plan to
make capital expenditures in the range of $60 million to
$70 million in fiscal 2010.
Our products require a wide variety of components, raw materials
and external foundry services, most of which we purchase from
third-party suppliers. We have multiple sources for many of the
components and materials that we purchase and incorporate into
our products. However, a large portion of our external wafer
purchases and foundry services are from a limited number of
suppliers, primarily TSMC. If TSMC or any of our other key
suppliers are unable or unwilling to manufacture and deliver
sufficient quantities of components to us, on the time schedule
and of the quality that we require, we may be forced to seek to
engage additional or replacement suppliers, which could result
in significant expenses and disruptions or delays in
manufacturing, product development and shipment of product to
our customers. Although we have experienced shortages of
components, materials and external foundry services from time to
time, these items have generally been available to us as needed.
Backlog
Backlog at the end of fiscal 2009 was approximately
$411 million, up from approximately $333 million at
the end of fiscal 2008. We define backlog as of a particular
date to mean firm orders from a customer or distributor with a
requested delivery date within thirteen weeks. Backlog is
impacted by the tendency of customers to rely on shorter
7
lead times available from suppliers, including us, in periods of
depressed demand. In periods of increased demand, there is a
tendency towards longer lead times that has the effect of
increasing backlog and, in some instances, we may not have
manufacturing capacity sufficient to fulfill all orders. As is
customary in the semiconductor industry, we allow most orders to
be cancelled or deliveries to be delayed by customers without
significant penalty. Accordingly, we believe that our backlog at
any time should not be used as an indication of our future
revenue.
We typically do not have long-term sales contracts with our
customers. In some of our markets where end-user demand may be
particularly volatile and difficult to predict, some customers
place orders that require us to manufacture product and have it
available for shipment, even though the customer is unwilling to
make a binding commitment to purchase all, or even any, of the
product. In other instances, we manufacture product based on
forecasts of customer demand. As a result, we may incur
inventory and manufacturing costs in advance of anticipated
sales and are subject to the risk of cancellation of orders
leading to a sharp reduction of sales and backlog. Further,
those orders or forecasts may be for products that meet the
customers unique requirements so that those cancelled
orders would, in addition, result in an inventory of unsaleable
products, resulting in potential inventory write-offs. As a
result of lengthy manufacturing cycles for some of our products
that are subject to these uncertainties, the amount of
unsaleable product could be substantial.
Government
Contracts
We estimate that approximately 5% of our fiscal 2009 product
revenue was attributable to sales to the U.S. government
and U.S. government contractors and subcontractors. Our
government contract business is predominantly in the form of
negotiated, firm fixed-price subcontracts. All such contracts
and subcontracts contain standard provisions relating to
termination at the election of the U.S. government.
Acquisitions,
Divestitures and Investments
An element of our business strategy involves expansion through
the acquisition of businesses, assets, products or technologies
that allow us to complement our existing product offerings,
expand our market coverage, increase our engineering workforce
or enhance our technological capabilities. From time to time, we
consider acquisitions and divestitures that may strengthen our
business.
Additional information relating to our acquisition and
divestiture activities during fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2007 is set forth in Note 2u. and Note 6 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Competition
We compete with a number of semiconductor companies in markets
that are highly competitive. Our competitors include:
|
|
|
Broadcom Corporation
|
|
Microchip Technology, Inc.
|
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
|
|
National Semiconductor Corporation
|
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
|
|
NXP Semiconductors
|
Infineon Technologies
|
|
ST Microelectronics
|
Intersil Corporation
|
|
Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
|
Linear Technology Corporation
|
|
Texas Instruments, Inc.
|
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
|
|
|
We believe that competitive performance in the marketplace for
real-world signal processing components depends upon several
factors, including design and quality of products, product
performance, features and functionality, and product pricing,
availability and capacity, with the relative importance of these
factors varying among products, markets and customers. We
believe our technical innovation emphasizing product performance
and reliability, supported by our commitment to strong customer
service and technical support, enables us to compete in our
chosen markets against both foreign and domestic semiconductor
manufacturers.
8
Many other companies offer products that compete with our
products, and some have greater financial, manufacturing,
technical and marketing resources than we have. Some of our
competitors may have better established supply or development
relationships with our current and potential customers.
Additionally, some formerly independent competitors have been
purchased by larger companies. Our competitors also include
emerging companies selling specialized products into markets we
serve. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete
successfully in the future against existing or new competitors,
or that our operating results will not be adversely affected by
increased price competition.
Environment
We are committed to protecting the environment and the health
and safety of our employees, customers and the public. We
endeavor to adhere to stringent regulatory and industry
standards across all of our facilities, to encourage pollution
prevention, to reduce our energy consumption and to strive
towards continual improvement. We strive to achieve a standard
of excellence in environmental, health and safety management
practices as an integral part of our total quality management
system.
Our management systems are certified to ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001,
ISO 9000 and TS16949. We are an applicant member of the
Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC). In fiscal
2009, we published our first Sustainability Report, which
detailed our commitment to reduced consumption of energy and
fair labor standards, among other things. We are not including
the information contained in our Sustainability Report, or
incorporating it by reference into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our manufacturing facilities are subject to numerous and
increasingly strict environmental laws and regulations,
particularly with respect to the transportation, storage,
handling, use, emission, discharge and disposal of certain
chemicals, gases and other substances used or produced in the
semiconductor manufacturing process. In addition, our products
are subject to increasingly stringent regulations regarding
chemical content under European Union regulatory programs, such
as RoHS and REACH enacted by individual countries. Contracts
with many of our customers reflect these and additional
environmental compliance obligations. Compliance with these laws
and regulations has not had a material impact on our capital
expenditures, earnings, financial condition or competitive
position. There can be no assurance, however, that current or
future environmental laws and regulations will not impose costly
requirements upon us. Any failure by us to comply with
applicable environmental laws, regulations and contractual
obligations could result in fines, suspension of production,
alteration of fabrication processes and legal liability.
Employees
As of October 31, 2009, we employed approximately 8,300
individuals worldwide. Our future success depends in large part
on the continued service of our key technical and senior
management personnel, and on our ability to continue to attract,
retain and motivate qualified employees, particularly those
highly-skilled design, process, test and applications engineers
involved in the design, support and manufacture of new and
existing products and processes. We believe that relations with
our employees are good; however, the competition for such
personnel is intense, and the loss of key personnel could have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations and
financial condition.
9
Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other
documents we file with the SEC are descriptions of the risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking
statements contained in this report.
The
current crisis in global credit and financial markets could
further materially and adversely affect our business and results
of operations.
As widely reported, global credit and financial markets continue
to experience disruptions, including diminished liquidity and
credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines
in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, and
uncertainty about economic stability. Our business has been
significantly affected by these conditions. While there are
signs that conditions may be improving, there is no certainty
that this trend will continue or that credit and financial
markets and confidence in economic conditions will not
deteriorate again. These economic uncertainties affect
businesses such as ours in a number of ways, making it difficult
to accurately forecast and plan our future business activities.
Accelerating layoffs, falling housing markets and the tightening
of credit by financial institutions may lead consumers and
businesses to continue to postpone spending, which may cause our
customers to cancel, decrease or delay their existing and future
orders with us. In addition, the inability of customers to
obtain credit could impair their ability to make timely payments
to us. Customer insolvencies in key industries, such as the
automotive industry, could also negatively impact our revenues
and our ability to collect receivables. In addition, financial
difficulties experienced by our suppliers or distributors could
result in product delays, increased accounts receivable defaults
and inventory challenges. The financial turmoil could cause
financial institutions to consolidate or go out of business,
which increases the risk that the actual amounts realized in the
future on our financial instruments could differ significantly
from the fair value assigned to them. We are unable to predict
the likely duration and severity of the current disruptions in
the credit and financial markets and adverse global economic
conditions, and if the current uncertain economic conditions
continue or further deteriorate, we may record additional
charges relating to restructuring costs or the impairment of
assets and our business and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Our
future revenue, gross margins, operating results and net income
are difficult to predict and may materially fluctuate.
Our future revenue, gross margins, operating results and net
income are difficult to predict and may be materially affected
by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the effects of adverse economic conditions in the United States
and international markets;
|
|
|
|
changes in customer demand for our products and for end products
that incorporate our products;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our efforts to refocus our operations,
including our ability to reduce our cost structure in both the
short term and over a longer duration;
|
|
|
|
the timing of new product announcements or introductions by us,
our customers or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
competitive pricing pressures;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields, adequate availability of
wafers and other raw materials, and manufacturing, assembly and
test capacity;
|
|
|
|
any significant decline in our backlog;
|
|
|
|
the timing, delay or cancellation of significant customer orders
and our ability to manage inventory;
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire, retain and motivate adequate numbers of
engineers and other qualified employees to meet the demands of
our customers;
|
|
|
|
changes in geographic, product or customer mix;
|
|
|
|
our ability to utilize our manufacturing facilities at efficient
levels;
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
potential significant litigation-related costs;
|
|
|
|
the difficulties inherent in forecasting future operating
expense levels, including with respect to costs associated with
labor, utilities, transportation and raw materials;
|
|
|
|
the costs related to compliance with increasing worldwide
environmental regulations;
|
|
|
|
changes in our effective tax rates in the United States, Ireland
or worldwide; and
|
|
|
|
the effects of public health emergencies, natural disasters,
security risks, terrorist activities, international conflicts
and other events beyond our control.
|
In addition, the semiconductor market has historically been
cyclical and subject to significant economic upturns and
downturns. Our business is subject to rapid technological
changes and there can be no assurance, depending on the mix of
future business, that products stocked in our inventory will not
be rendered obsolete before we ship them. As a result of these
and other factors, there can be no assurance that we will not
experience material fluctuations in future revenue, gross
margins, operating results and net income on a quarterly or
annual basis. In addition, if our revenue, gross margins,
operating results and net income do not meet the expectations of
securities analysts or investors, the market price of our common
stock may decline.
Changes
in our effective tax rate may impact our results of
operations.
A number of factors may increase our future effective tax rate,
including: the jurisdictions in which profits are earned and
taxed; the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with
various tax authorities; changes in the valuation of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities; adjustments to income taxes
upon finalization of various tax returns; increases in expenses
not deductible for tax purposes, including write-offs of
acquired in-process research and development and impairments of
goodwill in connection with acquisitions; changes in available
tax credits; and changes in tax laws or the interpretation of
such tax laws. Any significant increase in our future effective
tax rates could adversely impact our net income for future
periods.
Long-term
contracts are not typical for us and reductions, cancellations
or delays in orders for our products could adversely affect our
operating results.
We typically do not have long-term sales contracts with our
customers. In certain markets where end-user demand may be
particularly volatile and difficult to predict, some customers
place orders that require us to manufacture product and have it
available for shipment, even though the customer is unwilling to
make a binding commitment to purchase all, or even any, of the
product. In other instances, we manufacture product based on
forecasts of customer demands. As a result, we may incur
inventory and manufacturing costs in advance of anticipated
sales and are subject to the risk of cancellations of orders,
leading to a sharp reduction of sales and backlog. Further,
orders or forecasts may be for products that meet the
customers unique requirements so that those cancelled or
unrealized orders would, in addition, result in an inventory of
unsaleable products, causing potential inventory write-offs. As
a result of lengthy manufacturing cycles for certain of the
products that are subject to these uncertainties, the amount of
unsaleable product could be substantial. Incorrect forecasts, or
reductions, cancellations or delays in orders for our products
could adversely affect our operating results.
Our
future success depends upon our ability to continue to innovate,
improve our products, develop and market new products, and
identify and enter new markets.
Our success significantly depends on our continued ability to
improve our products and develop and market innovative new
products. Product development, innovation and enhancement is
often a complex, time-consuming and costly process involving
significant investment in research and development, with no
assurance of return on investment. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to develop and introduce new and improved
products in a timely or efficient manner or that new and
improved products, if developed, will achieve market acceptance.
Our products generally must conform to various evolving and
sometimes competing industry standards, which may adversely
affect our ability to compete in certain markets or require us
to incur significant costs. In addition, our customers generally
impose very high quality and reliability standards on our
products, which often change and may be difficult or costly to
satisfy. Any inability to satisfy customer quality standards or
comply with industry
11
standards and technical requirements may adversely affect demand
for our products and our results of operations. In addition, our
growth is dependent on our continued ability to identify and
penetrate new markets where we have limited experience and
competition is intense. Also, some of our customers in these
markets are less established, which could subject us to
increased credit risk. There can be no assurance that the
markets we serve will grow in the future, that our existing and
new products will meet the requirements of these markets, that
our products will achieve customer acceptance in these markets,
that competitors will not force price reductions or take market
share from us, or that we can achieve or maintain adequate gross
margins or profits in these markets. Furthermore, a decline in
demand in one or several of our end-user markets could have a
material adverse effect on the demand for our products and our
results of operations.
We may
not be able to compete successfully in markets within the
semiconductor industry in the future.
We face intense technological and pricing competition in the
semiconductor industry, and we expect this competition to
increase in the future. Many other companies offer products that
compete with our products. Some have greater financial,
manufacturing, technical and marketing resources than we have.
Some of our competitors may have more advantageous supply or
development relationships with our current and potential
customers or suppliers. Our competitors also include emerging
companies selling specialized products in markets we serve.
Competition is generally based on design and quality of
products, product performance, features and functionality, and
product pricing, availability and capacity, with the relative
importance of these factors varying among products, markets and
customers. Existing or new competitors may develop products or
technologies that more effectively address the demands of our
customers and markets with enhanced performance, features and
functionality, lower power requirements, greater levels of
integration or lower cost. Increased competition in certain
markets has resulted in and may continue to result in declining
average selling prices, reduced gross margins and loss of market
share in those markets. There can be no assurance that we will
be able to compete successfully in the future against existing
or new competitors, or that our operating results will not be
adversely affected by increased competition.
We rely
on third-party subcontractors and manufacturers for some
industry-standard wafers and assembly and test services, and
generally cannot control their availability or conditions of
supply.
We rely, and plan to continue to rely, on assembly and test
subcontractors and on third-party wafer fabricators to supply
most of our wafers that can be manufactured using
industry-standard submicron processes. This reliance involves
several risks, including reduced control over availability,
capacity utilization, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields,
quality assurance and costs. Additionally, we utilize a limited
number of third-party wafer fabricators, primarily Taiwan
Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC. These suppliers
manufacture components in accordance with our proprietary
designs and specifications. In addition, these suppliers often
provide manufacturing services to our competitors and therefore
periods of increased industry demand may result in capacity
constraints. If these suppliers are unable or unwilling to
manufacture and deliver sufficient quantities of components to
us on the time schedule and of the quality that we require, we
may be forced to seek to engage additional or replacement
suppliers, which could result in additional expenses and delays
in product development or shipment of product to our customers.
Approximately 49% of our fiscal year 2009 revenue was from
products fabricated at third-party wafer-fabrication facilities,
primarily TSMC.
The
markets for semiconductor products are cyclical, and increased
production may lead to overcapacity and lower prices, and
conversely, we may not be able to satisfy unexpected demand for
our products.
The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry has resulted
in periods when demand for our products has increased or
decreased rapidly. If we expand our operations and workforce too
rapidly or procure excessive resources in anticipation of
increased demand for our products, and that demand does not
materialize at the pace at which we expect or declines, or if we
overbuild inventory in a period of decreased demand, our
operating results may be adversely affected as a result of
increased operating expenses, reduced margins, underutilization
of capacity or asset impairment charges. These capacity
expansions by us and other semiconductor manufacturers could
also lead to overcapacity in our target markets which could lead
to price erosion that would adversely impact our operating
results. Conversely, during periods of rapid increases in
demand, our available capacity may not be sufficient to satisfy
the demand. In addition, we may not be able to expand our
workforce and operations in a
12
sufficiently timely manner, procure adequate resources, or
locate suitable third-party suppliers, to respond effectively to
changes in demand for our existing products or to the demand for
new products requested by our customers, and our current or
future business could be materially and adversely affected.
Our
semiconductor products are complex and we may be subject to
product warranty and indemnity claims, which could result in
significant costs and damage to our reputation and adversely
affect the market acceptance of our products.
Semiconductor products are highly complex and may contain
defects when they are first introduced or as new versions are
developed. We generally warrant our products to our customers
for one year from the date title passes from us. We invest
significant resources in the testing of our products; however,
if any of our products contain defects, we may be required to
incur additional development and remediation costs, pursuant to
warranty and indemnification provisions in our customer
contracts and purchase orders. These problems may divert our
technical and other resources from other product development
efforts and could result in claims against us by our customers
or others, including liability for costs associated with product
recalls, which may adversely impact our operating results. We
may also be subject to customer indemnity claims. Our customers
have on occasion been sued, and may in the future be sued by
third parties with respect to infringement or other product
matters, and those customers may seek indemnification from us
under the terms and conditions of our sales contracts with them.
In certain cases, our potential indemnification liability may be
significant. There can be no assurance that we are adequately
insured to protect against all claims and potential liabilities.
If any of our products contains defects, or has reliability,
quality or compatibility problems, our reputation may be
damaged, which could make it more difficult for us to sell our
products to existing and prospective customers and could
adversely affect our operating results.
We have manufacturing processes that utilize a substantial
amount of technology as the fabrication of integrated circuits
is a highly complex and precise process. Minute impurities,
contaminants in the manufacturing environment, difficulties in
the fabrication process, defects in the masks used in the wafer
manufacturing process, manufacturing equipment failures, wafer
breakage or other factors can cause a substantial percentage of
wafers to be rejected or numerous dice on each wafer to be
nonfunctional. While we have significant expertise in
semiconductor manufacturing, it is possible that some processes
could become unstable. This instability could result in
manufacturing delays and product shortages, which could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results.
We are
involved in frequent litigation, including regarding
intellectual property rights, which could be costly to bring or
defend and could require us to redesign products or pay
significant royalties.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims
and litigation involving patent and other intellectual property
rights, including claims arising under our contractual
obligations to indemnify our customers. Other companies or
individuals have obtained patents covering a variety of
semiconductor designs and processes, and we might be required to
obtain licenses under some of these patents or be precluded from
making and selling infringing products, if those patents are
found to be valid. From time to time, we receive claims from
third parties asserting that our products or processes infringe
their patents or other intellectual property rights. In the
event a third party makes a valid intellectual property claim
against us and a license is not available to us on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all, we could be forced either to
redesign or to stop production of products incorporating that
intellectual property, and our operating results could be
materially and adversely affected. Litigation may be necessary
to enforce our patents or other of our intellectual property
rights or to defend us against claims of infringement, and this
litigation could be costly and divert the attention of our key
personnel. We could be subject to warranty or product liability
claims that could lead to significant costs and expenses as we
defend those claims or pay damage awards. There can be no
assurance that we are adequately insured to protect against all
claims and potential liabilities. We may incur costs and
expenses relating to a recall of our customers products
due to an alleged failure of components we supply. An adverse
outcome in litigation could have a material adverse effect on
our financial position or on our operating results or cash flows
in the period in which the litigation is resolved.
13
We may be
unable to adequately protect our proprietary rights, which may
limit our ability to compete effectively.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our
intellectual property. We primarily rely on patent, mask work,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
nondisclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our
proprietary technologies and processes. Despite our efforts to
protect our proprietary technologies and processes, it is
possible that competitors or other unauthorized third parties
may obtain, copy, use or disclose our technologies, products and
processes. Moreover, the laws of foreign countries in which we
design, manufacture, market and sell our products may afford
little or no effective protection of our proprietary technology.
There can be no assurance that the claims allowed in our issued
patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. In
addition, any of our existing or future patents may be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented. As such, any rights
granted under these patents may not provide us with meaningful
protection. We may not have foreign patents or pending
applications corresponding to our U.S. patents and
applications. Even if foreign patents are granted, effective
enforcement in foreign countries may not be available. If our
patents do not adequately protect our technology, our
competitors may be able to offer products similar to ours. Our
competitors may also be able to develop similar technology
independently or design around our patents.
We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our
employees, consultants and strategic partners. We also try to
control access to and distribution of our technologies,
documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these
efforts, internal or external parties may attempt to copy,
disclose, obtain or use our products or technology without our
authorization. Also, former employees may seek employment with
our business partners, customers or competitors, and there can
be no assurance that the confidential nature of our proprietary
information will be maintained in the course of such future
employment.
If we do
not retain our key personnel, our ability to execute our
business strategy will be adversely affected.
Our continued success depends to a significant extent upon the
recruitment, retention and effective succession of our executive
officers and key management and technical personnel,
particularly our experienced engineers. The competition for
these employees is intense. The loss of the services of one or
more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect
on our operating results. In addition, there could be a material
adverse effect on our business should the turnover rates for
engineers and other key personnel increase significantly or if
we are unable to continue to attract qualified personnel. We do
not maintain any key person life insurance policy on any of our
officers or employees.
To remain
competitive, we may need to acquire other companies, purchase or
license technology from third parties, or enter into other
strategic transactions in order to introduce new products or
enhance our existing products.
An element of our business strategy involves expansion through
the acquisitions of businesses, assets, products or technologies
that allow us to complement our existing product offerings,
expand our market coverage, increase our engineering workforce
or enhance our technological capabilities. We may not be able to
find businesses that have the technology or resources we need
and, if we find such businesses, we may not be able to purchase
or license the technology or resources on commercially favorable
terms or at all. Acquisitions and technology licenses are
difficult to identify and complete for a number of reasons,
including the cost of potential transactions, competition among
prospective buyers and licensees, the need for regulatory
approvals, and difficulties related to integration efforts. In
order to finance a potential transaction, we may need to raise
additional funds by issuing securities or borrowing money. We
may not be able to find financing on favorable terms, and the
sale of our stock may result in the dilution of our existing
shareholders or the issuance of securities with rights that are
superior to the rights of our common shareholders.
Acquisitions also involve a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty integrating acquired technologies, operations and
personnel with our existing businesses;
|
|
|
|
diversion of management attention in connection with both
negotiating the acquisitions and integrating the assets;
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
strain on managerial and operational resources as management
tries to oversee larger operations;
|
|
|
|
the future funding requirements for acquired companies, which
may be significant;
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees;
|
|
|
|
exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired
companies; and
|
|
|
|
increased risk of costly and time-consuming litigation.
|
If we are unable to successfully address these risks, we may not
realize some or all of the expected benefits of the acquisition,
which may have an adverse effect on our business plans and
operating results.
We rely
on manufacturing capacity located in geologically unstable
areas, which could affect the availability of supplies and
services.
We, like many companies in the semiconductor industry, rely on
internal manufacturing capacity, wafer fabrication foundries and
other
sub-contractors
in geologically unstable locations around the world. This
reliance involves risks associated with the impact of
earthquakes on us and the semiconductor industry, including
temporary loss of capacity, availability and cost of key raw
materials, utilities and equipment and availability of key
services, including transport of our products worldwide. Any
prolonged inability to utilize one of our manufacturing
facilities, or those of our subcontractors or third-party wafer
fabrication foundries, as a result of fire, natural disaster,
unavailability of utilities or otherwise, would have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
We are
exposed to business, economic, political, legal and other risks
through our significant worldwide operations.
We have significant operations and manufacturing facilities
outside the United States, including in Ireland and the
Philippines. During fiscal 2009, approximately 80% of our
revenue was derived from customers in international markets.
Although we engage in hedging transactions to reduce our
exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations, there can be no
assurance that our competitive position will not be adversely
affected by changes in the exchange rate of the United States
dollar against other currencies. Potential interest rate
increases, as well as high energy costs, could have an adverse
impact on industrial and consumer spending patterns and could
adversely impact demand for our products. While a majority of
our cash is generated outside the United States, we require a
substantial amount of cash in the United Sates for operating
requirements, stock repurchases, cash dividends and
acquisitions. If we are unable to address our U.S. cash
requirements through operations, by efficient and timely
repatriations of overseas cash, through borrowings under our
current credit facility or from other sources of cash obtained
at an acceptable cost, our business strategies and operating
results could be adversely affected.
In addition to being exposed to the ongoing economic cycles in
the semiconductor industry, we are also subject to the economic,
political and legal risks inherent in international operations,
including the risks associated with the current crisis in global
credit and financial markets, ongoing uncertainties and
political and economic instability in many countries around the
world, as well as economic disruption from acts of terrorism and
the response to them by the United States and its allies. Other
business risks associated with international operations include
increased managerial complexities, air transportation
disruptions, expropriation, currency controls, currency exchange
rate movement, additional costs related to foreign taxes,
tariffs and freight rate increases, exposure to different
business practices and legal standards, particularly with
respect to price protection, intellectual property and
environmental compliance, trade and travel restrictions,
pandemics, import and export license requirements and
restrictions, difficulties in staffing and managing worldwide
operations, and accounts receivable collections.
We expect to continue to expand our business and operations in
China. Our success in the Chinese markets may be adversely
affected by Chinas continuously evolving laws and
regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and
export tariffs, currency controls, environmental regulations,
and intellectual property rights and enforcement of those
rights. Enforcement of existing laws or agreements may be
inconsistent, as there exists a high degree of fragmentation
among regulatory authorities resulting in uncertainties as to
which authorities have jurisdiction over particular parties or
transactions. In addition, changes in the political environment,
governmental
15
policies or
U.S.-China
relations could result in revisions to laws or regulations or
their interpretation and enforcement, increased taxation,
restrictions on imports, import duties or currency revaluations,
which could have an adverse effect on our business plans and
operating results.
Our
operating results are dependent on the performance of
independent distributors.
A significant portion of our sales are through independent
distributors that are not under our control. These independent
distributors generally represent product lines offered by
several companies and thus could reduce their sales efforts
applied to our products or terminate their representation of us.
We generally do not require letters of credit from our
distributors and are not protected against accounts receivable
default or bankruptcy by these distributors. Our inability to
collect open accounts receivable could adversely affect our
operating results. Termination of a significant distributor,
whether at our initiative or the distributors initiative,
could disrupt our current business, and if we are unable to find
suitable replacements, our operating results could be adversely
affected.
We are
subject to increasingly strict environmental regulations, which
could increase our expenses and affect our operating
results.
Our industry is subject to increasingly strict environmental
regulations that control and restrict the use, transportation,
emission, discharge, storage and disposal of certain chemicals,
gases and other substances used or produced in the semiconductor
manufacturing process. Public attention on environmental
controls has continued to increase, and our customers routinely
include stringent environmental standards in their contracts
with us. Changes in environmental regulations may require us to
invest in potentially costly pollution control equipment or
alter the way our products are made. In addition, we use
hazardous and other regulated materials that subject us to risks
of strict liability for damages caused by accidental releases,
regardless of fault. Any failure to control such materials
adequately or to comply with regulatory restrictions or
contractual obligations could increase our expenses and
adversely affect our operating results.
New climate change regulations could require us to change our
manufacturing processes or obtain substitute materials that may
cost more or be less available for our manufacturing operations.
In addition, new restrictions on carbon dioxide or other
greenhouse gas emissions could result in significant costs for
us. Greenhouse gas legislation has been introduced in
Massachusetts and the United States legislatures and we expect
increased worldwide regulatory activity in the future. The cost
of complying, or of failing to comply, with these and other
climate change and emissions regulations could have an adverse
effect on our business plans and operating results.
If we are
unable to generate sufficient cash flow, we may not be able to
service our debt obligations, including making payments on our
$375 million senior unsecured notes.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we issued in a public
offering $375 million aggregate principal amount of
5.0% senior unsecured notes due July 1, 2014. Our
ability to make payments of principal and interest on our
indebtedness when due depends upon our future performance, which
will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles
and financial, business and other factors affecting our
consolidated operations, many of which are beyond our control.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from
operations in the future to service our debt, we may be required
to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
|
|
|
|
refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness,
including the notes;
|
|
|
|
sell selected assets;
|
|
|
|
reduce or delay planned capital expenditures; or
|
|
|
|
reduce or delay planned operating expenditures.
|
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service
our debt, including the notes, which could negatively impact our
financial results. In addition, any such financing, refinancing
or sale of assets might not be available on economically
favorable terms.
16
Restrictions
in our credit facility and outstanding debt instruments may
limit our activities.
Our current credit facility and our 5.0% senior unsecured
notes impose, and future debt instruments to which we may become
subject may impose, restrictions that limit our ability to
engage in activities that could otherwise benefit our company,
including to undertake certain transactions, to create certain
liens on our assets and to incur certain subsidiary
indebtedness. Our ability to comply with these financial
restrictions and covenants is dependent on our future
performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions
and other factors, including factors that are beyond our control
such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates, changes in
technology and changes in the level of competition. In addition,
our credit facility requires us to maintain compliance with
specified financial ratios. If we breach any of the covenants
under our credit facility or the indenture governing our
outstanding notes and do not obtain appropriate waivers, then,
subject to applicable cure periods, our outstanding indebtedness
thereunder could be declared immediately due and payable.
Our stock
price may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile in the
past and may be volatile in the future, as it may be
significantly affected by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
crises in global credit and financial markets;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our revenue and operating
results;
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or our
failure to perform in line with those estimates or our published
guidance;
|
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of other semiconductor companies;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant new
products, technical innovations, acquisitions or dispositions,
litigation or capital commitments;
|
|
|
|
departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
actual or perceived noncompliance with corporate responsibility
or ethics standards by us or any of our employees, officers or
directors; and
|
|
|
|
negative media publicity targeting us or our competitors.
|
The stock market has historically experienced volatility,
especially within the semiconductor industry, that often has
been unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These
market fluctuations may cause our stock price to fall regardless
of our operating results.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
17
Our corporate headquarters is located in Norwood, Massachusetts.
Manufacturing and other operations are conducted in several
locations worldwide. The following tables provide certain
information about our principal general offices and
manufacturing facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Properties
|
|
|
|
|
Owned:
|
|
Use
|
|
Floor Space
|
|
Wilmington, MA
|
|
Wafer fabrication, testing, engineering, marketing and
administrative offices
|
|
|
586,200 sq. ft.
|
|
Cavite, Philippines
|
|
Wafer probe and testing, warehouse, engineering and
administrative offices
|
|
|
468,400 sq. ft.
|
|
Limerick, Ireland
|
|
Wafer fabrication, wafer probe and testing, engineering and
administrative offices
|
|
|
446,500 sq. ft.
|
|
Westwood, MA
|
|
Engineering, administrative offices and warehouse
|
|
|
100,500 sq. ft.
|
|
Greensboro, NC
|
|
Product testing, engineering and administrative offices
|
|
|
98,700 sq. ft.
|
|
San Jose, CA
|
|
Engineering, administrative offices
|
|
|
76,700 sq. ft.
|
|
Manila, Philippines
|
|
Components assembly and testing, engineering and administrative
offices
|
|
|
74,000 sq. ft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
Leased:
|
|
Use
|
|
Floor Space
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Renewals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(fiscal year)
|
|
|
|
Norwood, MA
|
|
Corporate headquarters, engineering, components testing, sales
and marketing offices
|
|
|
130,000 sq. ft.
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2, five-yr.
periods
|
Cambridge, MA(a)
|
|
Wafer fabrication, components testing and assembly engineering,
marketing and administrative offices
|
|
|
117,000 sq. ft.
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
None
|
Greensboro, NC
|
|
Engineering and administrative offices
|
|
|
47,600 sq. ft.
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1, two-yr.
period
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We finished production and began
clean-up at
this wafer fabrication facility during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009. For additional information, see Note 5 in the
Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
In addition to the principal leased properties listed in the
above table, we also lease sales offices and other premises at
25 locations in the United States and 36 locations
internationally under operating lease agreements. These leases
expire at various dates through the year 2022. We do not
anticipate experiencing significant difficulty in retaining
occupancy of any of our manufacturing, office or sales
facilities through lease renewals prior to expiration or through
month-to-month
occupancy, or in replacing them with equivalent facilities. For
information concerning our obligations under all operating
leases see Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
18
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business,
various claims, charges and litigation are asserted or commenced
against us arising from, or related to, contractual matters,
patents, trademarks, personal injury, environmental matters,
product liability, insurance coverage and personnel and
employment disputes. As to such claims and litigation, we can
give no assurance that we will prevail. We do not believe that
any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on
our financial position.
19
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders
during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2009.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth (i) the name, age and
position of each of our executive officers and (ii) the
business experience of each person named in the table during at
least the past five years. There is no family relationship among
any of our executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
Ray Stata
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Chairman of the Board since 1973; Chief Executive Officer from
1973 to November 1996; President from 1971 to November 1991.
|
Jerald G. Fishman
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
Chief Executive Officer since November 1996; President and
Director since November 1991; Executive Vice President from 1988
to November 1991; Group Vice President Components
from 1982 to 1988.
|
David A. Zinsner
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer since
January 2009; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Intersil Corporation from 2005 to December 2008; Corporate
Controller and Treasurer Intersil Corporation from 1999 to 2005.
|
Seamus Brennan
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer since December 2008; Corporate Controller from 2002 to
December 2008; Assistant Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2002;
Manager Enterprise System Implementation from 1994 to 1997;
Plant Controller, Analog Devices, B.V. Limerick,
Ireland from 1989 to 1994.
|
Samuel H. Fuller
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Vice President, Research and Development and Chief Technology
Officer
|
|
Vice President, Research and Development since March 1998; Chief
Technology Officer since March 2006; Vice President of Research
and Chief Scientist of Digital Equipment Corp. from 1983 to 1998.
|
Robert R. Marshall
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide Manufacturing
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide Manufacturing since February 1994;
Vice President, Manufacturing, Limerick Site, Analog Devices,
B.V. Limerick, Ireland from November 1991 to
February 1994; Plant Manager, Analog Devices, B.V.
Limerick, Ireland from January 1991 to November 1991.
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Business Experience
|
|
William Matson
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources since November 2006; Chief Human
Resource Officer of Lenovo, an international computer
manufacturer, from January 2005 to June 2006; General Manager of
IBM Business Transformation Outsourcing from September 2003 to
April 2005; Vice President, Human Resources of IBM Asia Pacific
Region from December 1999 to September 2003.
|
Robert McAdam
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President, Core Products and Technologies Group
|
|
Vice President, Core Products and Technologies Group since
October 2009; Vice President and General Manager, Analog
Semiconductor Components from February 1994 to September 2009;
Vice President and General Manager, Analog Devices,
B.V. Limerick, Ireland from January 1991 to February
1994; Product Line Manager, Analog Devices, B.V.
Limerick, Ireland from October 1988 to January 1991.
|
Vincent Roche
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President, Strategic Market Segments Group
|
|
Vice President, Strategic Market Segments Group since October
2009; Vice President, Worldwide Sales from March 2001 to October
2009; Vice President and General Manager, Silicon Valley
Business Units and Computer & Networking from 1999 to March
2001; Product Line Director from 1995 to 1999; Product Marketing
Manager from 1988 to 1995.
|
Margaret K. Seif
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January
2006; Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of
RSA Security Inc. from January 2000 to November 2005; Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary of RSA Security Inc.
from June 1998 to January 2000.
|
21
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol ADI. The tables below set forth the high and low
sales prices per share of our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange and the dividends declared for each quarterly period
within our two most recent fiscal years.
High and
Low Sales Prices of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
Period
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.40
|
|
|
$
|
15.29
|
|
|
$
|
33.83
|
|
|
$
|
26.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
22.53
|
|
|
$
|
17.82
|
|
|
$
|
33.93
|
|
|
$
|
26.54
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
28.21
|
|
|
$
|
19.14
|
|
|
$
|
36.35
|
|
|
$
|
29.35
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
29.71
|
|
|
$
|
25.54
|
|
|
$
|
33.53
|
|
|
$
|
18.02
|
|
Dividends
Declared Per Outstanding Share of Common Stock
In fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, we paid a cash dividend in each
quarter as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, on November 19,
2009, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20
per outstanding share of common stock. The dividend will be paid
on December 23, 2009 to all shareholders of record at the
close of business on December 4, 2009. The payment of
future dividends, if any, will be based on several factors
including our financial performance, outlook and liquidity.
Information regarding our equity compensation plans and the
securities authorized for issuance thereunder is set forth in
Item 12 below.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased(a)
|
|
|
|
Per Share(b)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs(c)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
August 2, 2009 through August 29, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,614,067
|
|
August 30, 2009 through September 26, 2009
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,614,067
|
|
September 27, 2009 through October 31, 2009
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,614,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,614,067
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 1,684 shares paid to us by employees to satisfy
employee tax obligations upon vesting of restricted stock
granted to our employees under our equity compensation plans. |
|
(b) |
|
The average price paid per share of stock repurchased under the
stock repurchase program includes the commissions paid to the
brokers. |
22
|
|
|
(c) |
|
We publicly announced a stock repurchase program on
August 12, 2004. On June 6, 2007, our Board of
Directors authorized the repurchase by us of an additional
$1 billion of our common stock, increasing the total amount
of our common stock we are authorized to repurchase under the
program to $4 billion. Under the repurchase program, we may
repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock from time to
time in the open market and through privately negotiated
transactions. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of our
Board of Directors, the repurchase program will expire when we
have repurchased all shares authorized for repurchase under the
repurchase program. |
The number of holders of record of our common stock at
November 20, 2009 was 3,067. This number does not include
shareholders for whom shares are held in a nominee
or street name. On October 30, 2009, the last
reported sales price of our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $25.63 per share.
Comparative
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares cumulative total shareholder return
on our common stock since October 30, 2004 with the
cumulative total return of the Standard & Poors
500 Index and the Standard & Poors
Semiconductors Index. This graph assumes the investment of $100
on October 30, 2004 in our common stock, the S&P 500
Index and the S&P Semiconductors Index and assumes all
dividends are reinvested. Measurement points are the last
trading day for each respective fiscal year.
23
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table includes selected financial data for each of
our last five fiscal years and includes adjustments to reflect
the classification of our Baseband Chipset Business and our CPU
voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring business as
discontinued operations. See Note 2u. in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for information on discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Statement of Operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,464,721
|
|
|
$
|
2,250,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,037,154
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax*
|
|
|
247,408
|
|
|
|
525,177
|
|
|
|
502,123
|
|
|
|
519,175
|
|
|
|
365,328
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax*
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
261,107
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
30,307
|
|
|
|
49,459
|
|
Net income*
|
|
|
247,772
|
|
|
|
786,284
|
|
|
|
496,907
|
|
|
|
549,482
|
|
|
|
414,787
|
|
Income per share from continuing operations, net of tax*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
Net income per share*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
Balance Sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,404,294
|
|
|
$
|
3,090,992
|
|
|
$
|
2,970,942
|
|
|
$
|
3,986,851
|
|
|
$
|
4,583,211
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
$
|
379,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Company includes the expense associated with stock options
in the statement of income effective in fiscal 2006. |
24
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (all tabular amounts in thousands except per share
amounts)
|
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, including in particular the
section entitled Outlook, contains forward-looking
statements regarding future events and our future results that
are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act
of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). These
statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we
operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words
such as expects, anticipates,
targets, goals, projects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, estimates, continues,
may, variations of such words and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. In addition, any statements that refer to
projections regarding our future financial performance,
particularly in light of the ongoing global credit and financial
market crisis; our anticipated growth and trends in our
businesses, our capital needs and capital expenditures; our
market position and competitive changes in the marketplace for
our products; our ability to innovate new products and
technologies; the timing or the effectiveness of our efforts to
refocus our operations and reduce our cost structure and the
expected amounts of any cost savings related to those efforts;
our ability to access credit or capital markets; our ability to
pay dividends or repurchase stock; our ability to service our
outstanding debt; our expected tax rate; our third-party
suppliers; intellectual property and litigation matters;
potential acquisitions or divestitures; key personnel; the
effect of new accounting pronouncements and other
characterizations of future events or circumstances are
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these
forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject
to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to
predict, including those identified in Part I,
Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely
from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We
undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements except to the extent required by law.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we sold our baseband
chipset business and related support operations, or Baseband
Chipset Business, to MediaTek Inc. and sold our CPU voltage
regulation and PC thermal monitoring business to certain
subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation. The financial
results of these businesses are presented as discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of income for all
periods presented. The assets and liabilities related to these
businesses are reflected as assets and liabilities of
discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheets as of
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008. Unless
otherwise noted, this Managements Discussion and Analysis
relates only to financial results from continuing operations.
Results
of Operations
Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,464,721
|
|
Gross Margin %
|
|
|
55.5
|
%
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
Net income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
247,408
|
|
|
$
|
525,177
|
|
|
$
|
502,123
|
|
Net income from Continuing Operations as a % of Total Revenue
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
The
year-to-year
revenue changes by end market and product category are more
fully outlined below under Revenue Trends by End Market
and Revenue Trends by Product.
In fiscal year 2009, our revenue decreased 22% from fiscal 2008
and our diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
decreased by 52%. Our fiscal 2009 cash flow from operations was
$432.1 million, or 21% of revenue. We received net proceeds
of $370.4 million during fiscal 2009 from the issuance of
long-term debt and had $1,816 million of cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments as of October 31,
2009.
The global credit crisis and current economic conditions could
continue to result in cautious customer spending behavior. We
cannot predict the severity, duration or precise impact of the
economic downturn on our
25
future financial results. Consequently, our reported results for
the fiscal 2009 may not be indicative of our future results.
Revenue
Trends by End Market
The following table summarizes revenue by end market. The
categorization of revenue by end market is determined using a
variety of data points including the technical characteristics
of the product, the sold to customer information,
the ship to customer information and the end
customer product or application into which our product will be
incorporated. As data systems for capturing and tracking this
data evolve and improve, the categorization of products by end
market can vary over time. When this occurs, we reclassify
revenue by end market for prior periods. Such reclassifications
typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the
underlying trends of results within, each end market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Y/Y%
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue **
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
$
|
1,049,158
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,386,874
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,323,252
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
512,941
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
590,267
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
477,645
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
400,290
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
512,339
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
523,793
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Computer
|
|
|
52,519
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(44
|
)%
|
|
|
93,451
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
105,031
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Product Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,429,721
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from one-time IP license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,464,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The year ended November 3, 2007 was a 53-week year. We
follow a 52-week, or
364-day
fiscal calendar that results in a 53-week year approximately
every seventh year, as occurred in fiscal 2007. |
|
** |
|
The sum of the individual percentages do not equal the total due
to rounding. |
Industrial The
year-to-year
decrease from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 in industrial end
market revenue was primarily the result of a broad-based decline
in demand in this end market, which was most significant for
products sold into the instrumentation, automotive and process
controls sectors of this end market. The
year-to-year
increase from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 in industrial end
market revenue was primarily the result of revenue growth in
products sold into the instrumentation and automotive sectors
and, to a lesser extent, the defense sector. The revenue growth
in these sectors was partially offset by a decline in revenue
from products used in automatic test equipment.
Communications The
year-to-year
decrease from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 in communications end
market revenue was primarily the result of a decrease in sales
of analog products used in basestations, wireless handsets and
networking applications. The
year-to-year
increase from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 in communications end
market revenue was primarily the result of revenue growth in
sales of analog products used in basestations and wireless
handsets.
Consumer The
year-to-year
decrease from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 in consumer end market
revenue was primarily the result of a decrease in demand for
products used in home entertainment, digital cameras and video
game applications, consistent with the global slowdown in
consumer spending. The
year-to-year
decrease from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 in consumer end market
revenue was primarily the result of an increase in revenue from
advanced television and digital camera applications that was
offset by a decline in revenue from other consumer applications,
consistent with the global slowdown in consumer spending.
Computer The
year-to-year
decrease from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 in computer end market
revenue was primarily the result of a general slowdown in the PC
market. The
year-to-year
decrease from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 was primarily the
result of broad-based declines in sales of our products into
this end market.
26
Revenue from One-Time IP License During the
first quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded revenue of
$35 million received in exchange for licensing of certain
intellectual property rights to a third party.
Revenue
Trends by Product
The following table summarizes revenue by product categories.
The categorization of our products into broad categories is
based on the characteristics of the individual products, the
specification of the products and in some cases the specific
uses that certain products have within applications. The
categorization of products into categories is therefore subject
to judgment in some cases and can vary over time. In instances
where products move between product categories we reclassify the
amounts in the product categories for all prior periods. Such
reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing
of, or the underlying trends of results within, each product
category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue**
|
|
|
Y/Y%
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue**
|
|
|
Converters
|
|
$
|
960,502
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,190,866
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,104,932
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Amplifiers
|
|
|
501,759
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
|
|
665,585
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
618,267
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Other analog
|
|
|
261,059
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
318,648
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
334,652
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing
|
|
|
1,723,320
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
2,175,099
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
2,057,851
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power management & reference
|
|
|
118,247
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
143,698
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
124,101
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products
|
|
$
|
1,841,567
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,318,797
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,181,952
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General purpose DSP
|
|
|
167,133
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
234,946
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
214,339
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other DSP
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(79
|
)%
|
|
|
29,188
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
33,430
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DSP products
|
|
$
|
173,341
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
$
|
264,134
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
247,769
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Product Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,429,721
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from one-time IP license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,464,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The year ended November 3, 2007 was a 53-week year. We
follow a 52-week, or
364-day
fiscal calendar that results in a 53-week year approximately
every seventh year, as occurred in fiscal 2007. |
|
** |
|
The sum of the individual percentages may not equal the total
due to rounding. |
The decrease in revenue from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009 was due
to declining demand across our product categories in every
market that we serve, particularly the industrial and consumer
end markets, as a result of an overall decline in the worldwide
economy.
The increase in revenue from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 was the
result of a broad-based increase in sales across many of our
product categories. The increase in sales of converters and
amplifiers was primarily attributable to an increase in demand
for our products used in the industrial and communications end
markets.
27
Revenue
Trends by Geographic Region
The percentage of product sales from continuing operations by
geographic region, based upon point of sale, for the last three
fiscal years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Region
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Rest of North and South America
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
China
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Rest of Asia
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
In fiscal year 2009 the predominant countries comprising
Rest of North and South America are Canada and
Mexico; the predominant countries comprising Europe
are Germany, Sweden and France; and the predominant countries
comprising Rest of Asia are Korea, Taiwan and
Singapore.
In fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2007 the predominant
countries comprising Rest of North and South America
are Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising
Europe are Germany, France and the United Kingdom;
and the predominant countries comprising Rest of
Asia are Taiwan and Korea.
Sales declined in all geographic regions in the fiscal 2009, as
compared to fiscal 2008, with sales in Europe and Japan
experiencing the largest decline. This decline in sales in
Europe was partially attributable to a decline in the automotive
end market. The decline in sales in Japan was principally
attributable to the general decline in consumer spending as a
result of the global economic crisis. The decline in China was
smaller than the decline in the other regions primarily due to
the strong demand for our products used in Chinas recent
infrastructure build-out of the countrys next generation
of communication technology.
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Gross Margin
|
|
$
|
1,118,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,577,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,508,276
|
|
Gross Margin %
|
|
|
55.5
|
%
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
Gross margin percentage was lower in fiscal 2009 by
560 basis points as compared to fiscal 2008, primarily as a
result of a decrease in sales of $568.0 million and reduced
operating levels in our manufacturing facilities that created
adverse utilization variances.
Gross margin percentage in fiscal 2008 was lower by
10 basis points from the gross margin recorded in fiscal
2007 primarily as a result of recording revenue in fiscal 2007
of $35 million we received in exchange for the licensing of
certain intellectual property rights to a third party with no
associated cost of sales.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense
As of October 31, 2009, the total compensation cost related
to unvested equity awards not yet recognized in our statement of
income was approximately $103.4 million (before tax
consideration), which we will recognize over a weighted average
period of 1.6 years.
During fiscal 2009, our shareholders approved and we completed
an employee stock option exchange program (Option Exchange). The
Option Exchange provided our eligible employees, except our
named executive officers and directors, the opportunity to
exchange eligible stock option grants for a smaller number of
new stock options, with a lower exercise price, or in some
instances, cash, that had approximately the same fair value as
the options surrendered.
28
See Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for further information.
Research
and Development (R&D)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
R&D Expenses
|
|
$
|
446,980
|
|
|
$
|
533,480
|
|
|
$
|
509,553
|
|
R&D Expenses as a % of Product Revenue
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
Research and development, or R&D, expenses in fiscal 2009
decreased $86.5 million, or 16%, from fiscal 2008. This
decrease was primarily the result of the actions we took to
constrain or permanently reduce operating expenses as well as a
decrease in variable compensation expenses.
R&D expenses in fiscal 2008 increased by
$23.9 million, or 5%, from the amount recorded in fiscal
2007. This increase was primarily the result of higher employee
salary, benefit and variable compensation expenses, which were
partially offset by one fewer week of operations in fiscal 2008
than in fiscal 2007 and lower employee stock option expenses.
R&D expenses as a percentage of revenue will fluctuate from
year-to-year
depending on the amount of revenue and the success of new
product development efforts, which we view as critical to our
future growth. At any point in time we have hundreds of R&D
projects underway, and we believe that none of these projects is
material on an individual basis. We expect to continue the
development of innovative technologies and processes for new
products, and we believe that a continued commitment to R&D
is essential in order to maintain product leadership with our
existing products and to provide innovative new product
offerings, and therefore, we expect to continue to make
significant R&D investments in the future.
Selling,
Marketing, General and Administrative (SMG&A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
SMG&A Expenses
|
|
$
|
333,184
|
|
|
$
|
415,682
|
|
|
$
|
389,505
|
|
SMG&A Expenses as a % of Product Revenue
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative, or SMG&A,
expenses in fiscal 2009 decreased $82.5 million, or 20%,
from fiscal 2008. This decrease was primarily the result of our
actions taken to constrain or permanently reduce operating
expenses as well as a decrease in variable compensation expenses.
SMG&A expenses increased by $26.2 million, or 7%, in
fiscal 2008 as compared to the amount recorded in fiscal 2007.
This increase was primarily the result of higher employee
salary, benefit and variable compensation expenses, which were
partially offset by lower employee stock option expenses and one
less week of operations in fiscal 2008 than in fiscal 2007.
Fiscal 2007 also included $8.5 million related to the
reimbursement of legal expenses we received as a result of the
settlement of litigation in fiscal 2007.
Special
Charges
Closure
of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Sunnyvale
We ceased production at our California wafer fabrication
facility in November 2006. We are paying the lease obligation
costs on a monthly basis over the remaining lease term, which
expires in 2010. We completed the
clean-up
activity during fiscal 2007, and we do not expect to incur any
additional charges related to this action.
Reorganization
of Product Development and Support Programs
We recorded special charges in fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007
as a result of our decision to reorganize our product
development and support programs with the goal of providing
greater focus on our analog and digital signal processing
product programs. We terminated the employment of all employees
associated with these programs and
29
have paid all amounts owed to employees for severance. We do not
expect to incur any further charges related to this
reorganization action.
Consolidation
of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Limerick
In fiscal 2007, we recorded a special charge of
$13.7 million as a result of our decision to only use
eight-inch technology at our wafer fabrication facility in
Limerick. Certain manufacturing processes and products produced
on the Limerick facilitys six-inch production line have
transitioned to our existing eight-inch production line in
Limerick while others have transitioned to external foundries.
The charge was for severance and fringe benefit costs recorded
under our ongoing benefit plan for 150 manufacturing employees
associated with this action. As of October 31, 2009, we
still employed 2 of the 150 employees included in this
action. These employees must continue to be employed by us until
their employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive
the severance benefit. During fiscal 2008, we recorded an
additional charge of $1.5 million related to this action,
of which $1.2 million was an adjustment to the original
estimate of the severance costs and $0.3 million was for
clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. During fiscal
2009, we recorded additional charges of $1.2 million for
clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. The production in
the six-inch wafer fabrication facility ceased during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009. We do not expect to incur any further
charges related to this action. We estimate that the closure of
this facility will result in annual cost savings of
approximately $25 million per year, which we expect to
realize starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. We expect
these annual savings will be in cost of sales, of which
approximately $1 million relates to non-cash depreciation
savings.
Reduction
of Overhead Infrastructure Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we recorded a special
charge as a result of our decision to either deemphasize or exit
certain businesses or products and focus investments in products
and end markets where we have better opportunities for
profitable growth. In September 2007, we entered into a
definitive agreement to sell our Baseband Chipset Business. As a
result, we decided to reduce the support infrastructure in
manufacturing, engineering and SMG&A to more appropriately
reflect our required overhead structure. We terminated the
employment of all employees associated with this action and have
paid all amounts owed to employees for severance. We do not
expect to incur any further charges related to this action.
These cost reduction actions, which were substantially completed
in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, resulted in annual savings
of approximately $15 million. We realized these savings as
follows: approximately $7 million in R&D expenses,
approximately $6 million in SMG&A expenses and
approximately $2 million in cost of sales.
Reduction
of Operating Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, in order to further
reduce our operating cost structure, we recorded a special
charge of $1.6 million for severance and fringe benefit
costs recorded under our ongoing benefit plan or statutory
requirements at foreign locations for 19 engineering and
SMG&A employees. We terminated the employment of all
employees associated with this charge and are paying amounts
owed to employees for severance as income continuance.
During fiscal 2009, we recorded an additional charge of
$30.3 million related to this cost reduction action.
Approximately $2.1 million of this charge was for lease
obligation costs for facilities that we ceased using during the
first quarter of fiscal 2009; approximately $0.9 million
was for the write-off of property, plant and equipment; and
approximately $0.8 million was for contract termination
costs and for
clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. The remaining
$26.5 million related to the severance and fringe benefit
costs recorded under our ongoing benefit plan or statutory
requirements at foreign locations, for 245 manufacturing
employees and 302 engineering and SMG&A employees. As of
October 31, 2009, we still employed 16 of the
547 employees included in this cost reduction action. These
employees must continue to be employed by us until their
employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive the
severance benefit.
We believe this cost reduction action, which was substantially
completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2009, will result
in annual savings of approximately $36.4 million once fully
implemented. We expect these annual savings will be realized as
follows: approximately $31.6 million in SMG&A expenses
and approximately
30
$4.8 million in cost of sales. A portion of these savings
is reflected in our results for fiscal year 2009 and the
remainder of the savings will be fully reflected in our results
by the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Closure
of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Cambridge
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded a special
charge of $22.1 million as a result of our decision to
consolidate our Cambridge, Massachusetts wafer fabrication
facility into our existing Wilmington, Massachusetts facility.
In connection with the anticipated closure of this facility, we
evaluated the recoverability of the facilities
manufacturing assets and concluded that there was an impairment
of approximately $12.9 million based on the revised period
of intended use. The remaining $9.2 million was for
severance and fringe benefit costs recorded under our ongoing
benefit plan for 175 manufacturing employees and 9 SMG&A
employees associated with this action.
We finished production in the Cambridge fabrication facility and
began
clean-up
activity during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. During the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we reversed approximately
$1.8 million of the severance accrual. The accrual reversal
was required because 51 employees either voluntarily left
the Company or found alternative employment within the Company.
In addition, we recorded a special charge of approximately
$1.7 million for the impairment of manufacturing assets
that were originally going to be moved to our other wafer
fabrication facilities, but are no longer needed at those
facilities and therefore have no future use. We also recorded a
special charge of $0.1 million for
clean-up
costs as we began our cleanup of the Cambridge fabrication
facility at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. As of
October 31, 2009, we still employed 33 employees
included in this action. The remaining employees will continue
working during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 on the cleanup
and closure of the wafer fabrication facility. These employees
must continue to be employed by us until their employment is
involuntarily terminated in order to receive the severance
benefit. We expect to incur additional expenses, that cannot be
precisely determined at this time, related to this action in the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 for lease termination, cleanup and
closure costs. The lease charge will be taken when we cease
using the building and the cleanup and closure costs will be
expensed as incurred.
We estimate that the closure of this facility will result in
annual cost savings of approximately $41 million per year,
expected to be fully realized starting in the third quarter of
fiscal 2010. We expect these annual savings to be realized as
follows: approximately $40.2 million in cost of sales, of
which approximately $4.0 million relates to non-cash
depreciation savings, and approximately $0.8 million in
SMG&A expenses.
Operating
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating income from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
284,817
|
|
|
$
|
625,025
|
|
|
$
|
568,723
|
|
Operating income from Continuing Operations as a % of Total
Revenue
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
The $340.2 million, or 54%, decrease in operating income
from continuing operations in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal
2008 was primarily the result of a decrease in revenue of
$568.0 million, a 560 basis point decrease in gross
margin percentage and an increase of $50.6 million in
special charges. This decrease in operating income from
continuing operations was partially offset by a decrease in
R&D and SMG&A expenses as more fully described above
under the headings Research and Development and
Selling, Marketing, General and Administrative.
The $56.3 million, or 10%, increase in operating income in
fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007 was primarily the result
of an increase in total revenue of $118.2 million and, to a
lesser extent, a decrease in special charges of
$37.4 million. This increase in operating income from
continuing operations was partially offset by a 10 basis
point decrease in gross margin percentage, an increase in
operating expenses as more fully described above under the
headings Research and Development and Selling,
Marketing, General and Administrative, and the fact that
fiscal 2007 included $35 million in non-product revenue
that we received in exchange for the licensing of certain
intellectual property rights to a third party with no associated
cost of sales.
31
Nonoperating
(Income) Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(15,621
|
)
|
|
|
(41,041
|
)
|
|
|
(77,007
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(15,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonoperating income
|
|
$
|
(12,627
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,077
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income was lower by $28.5 million in fiscal
2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 primarily due to lower interest
income earned on investments as a result of lower interest rates
in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008. In addition, we
incurred interest expense during fiscal 2009 as a result of the
issuance of $375 million aggregate principal
5.0% senior unsecured notes on June 30, 2009. We
entered into an interest rate swap in June 2009 that swaps the
fixed rate of the notes to a variable rate based on the
three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.34% as of October 31, 2009).
Nonoperating income in fiscal 2008 was lower by
$51.7 million as compared to fiscal 2007 primarily as a
result of lower average invested cash balances and, to a lesser
extent, lower interest rates in fiscal 2008 as compared to
fiscal 2007. In addition, other income in fiscal 2007 included
$10.5 million we received as part of a litigation
settlement and a $7.9 million gain from the sale of an
investment.
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
50,036
|
|
|
$
|
140,925
|
|
|
$
|
159,553
|
|
Effective Income Tax Rate
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
Our effective tax rate reflects the applicable tax rate in
effect in the various tax jurisdictions around the world where
our income is earned.
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was lower compared to our
effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 primarily as a result of our
recording special charges of $53.7 million in fiscal 2009,
a majority of which provided a tax benefit at the higher
U.S. tax rate, and as a result of a change in the mix of
our income to jurisdictions where income is taxed at a lower
rate.
Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 was lower by
290 basis points compared to our effective tax rate for
fiscal 2007. The 2007 tax rate included the following
transactions, which were taxed at the higher U.S. tax rate:
the one-time receipt of $35 million associated with the
licensing of intellectual property to a third party,
$19 million we received from a settlement of litigation and
a $7.9 million gain on the sale of an investment. In
addition, the 2007 tax rate included tax expense related to the
finalization of the accounting for a 2006 acquisition. These
items, which had the effect of increasing the 2007 tax rate,
were partially offset by a higher R&D credit in fiscal 2007
than in fiscal 2008. In addition to these isolated transactions
that impacted our tax rate, a larger percentage of our profits
were earned in lower tax jurisdictions during fiscal 2008, as
compared to fiscal 2007, causing a decrease in our tax rate.
Income
from Continuing Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
247,408
|
|
|
$
|
525,177
|
|
|
$
|
502,123
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations, net of tax as a % of Total
Revenue
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
20.4
|
%
|
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
32
Income from continuing operations, net of tax, in fiscal 2009
was lower than in fiscal 2008 by approximately
$277.8 million primarily as a result of the
$340.2 million decrease in operating income that was
partially offset by a lower provision for income taxes in fiscal
2009.
Income from continuing operations, net of tax, in fiscal 2008
was higher than in fiscal 2007 by approximately
$23.1 million primarily as a result of the
$56.3 million increase in operating income from continuing
operations that was partially offset by a $51.7 million
decrease in nonoperating income and a lower provision for income
taxes in fiscal 2008.
The impact of inflation and foreign currency exchange rate
movement on our results of operations during the past three
fiscal years has not been significant.
Discontinued
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
12,779
|
|
|
$
|
(5,216
|
)
|
Gain on sale of Discontinued Operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
261,107
|
|
|
$
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from Discontinued Operations
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
We sold our baseband chipset business to MediaTek Inc. and our
CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring business to
certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation during the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. Accordingly, the results of the
operations of these businesses have been presented as
discontinued operations within the consolidated financial
statements.
Acquisitions
In fiscal 2006, we completed a transaction with TTPCom Limited
(TTPCom), whereby TTPCom transferred to us intellectual
property, engineering resources, and related assets associated
with the support and customization of TTPComs
GSM/GPRS/EDGE modem software for use on our existing and future
generations of
SoftFone®
baseband processors. We also acquired development rights for
AJAR, TTPComs advanced applications platform. As a result
of this transaction, we became the single point of contact for
both hardware and software support for our new and existing
wireless handset customers, thus improving our ability to
service the needs of individual customers. During fiscal 2007,
we paid $6.1 million of contingent consideration related to
this acquisition.
In fiscal 2006, we acquired substantially all the outstanding
stock of privately-held Integrant Technologies, Inc. (Integrant)
of Seoul, Korea. The acquisition enabled us to enter the mobile
TV market and strengthened our presence in the Asia region. We
paid $8.4 million related to the purchase of shares from
the founder of Integrant during the period from July 2007
through July 2009. We recorded these payments as additional
goodwill.
In fiscal 2006, we acquired all the outstanding stock of
privately-held AudioAsics A/S (AudioAsics) of Roskilde, Denmark.
The acquisition of AudioAsics allows us to continue developing
low-power audio solutions, while expanding our presence in the
Nordic and Eastern European regions. We paid additional cash
payments of $3.1 million during fiscal 2009 for the
achievement of revenue-based milestones during the period from
October 2006 through January 2009, which were recorded as
additional goodwill. In addition, in accordance with the terms
of the acquisition documents, we paid $3.2 million during
fiscal 2009 based on the achievement of technological milestones
during the period from October 2006 through January 2009, which
were recorded as compensation expense in fiscal 2008. All
revenue and technological milestones related to this
acquisitions have been met and no additional payments will be
made.
We have not provided pro forma results of operations for TTPCom,
Integrant and AudioAsics in this report as they were not
material to us on either an individual or an aggregate basis. We
included the results of operations of each acquisition in our
consolidated statement of income from the date of such
acquisition.
33
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operations
|
|
$
|
432,148
|
|
|
$
|
669,368
|
|
|
$
|
820,365
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operations as a % of Total Revenue
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
At October 31, 2009, cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments totaled $1,816 million, an increase of
$506.3 million from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. The
primary sources of funds for fiscal 2009 were net cash generated
from operating activities of $432.1 million and net
proceeds of $370.4 million from the issuance of our senior
unsecured notes in June 2009. The principal uses of funds for
fiscal 2009 were dividend payments of $233.0 million and
capital expenditures of $56.1 million.
We sold our baseband chipset business to MediaTek Inc. and our
CPU voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring business to
certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation during the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. The cash flows from these
discontinued operations have been combined with the operating,
investing and financing cash flows from continuing operations
(i.e. no separate classification of cash flows from discontinued
operations) for all periods presented. We believe the absence of
the cash flows from these discontinued operations has not and
will not have a material impact on our future liquidity and
financial position. Additionally, as a result of these
dispositions, we reclassified certain assets and liabilities
related to these businesses to assets or liabilities of
discontinued operations. See Note 2u. in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for further information regarding these discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$
|
301,036
|
|
|
$
|
315,290
|
|
Days Sales Outstanding*
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
253,161
|
|
|
$
|
314,629
|
|
Days Cost of Sales in Inventory*
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We use the annualized fourth quarter revenue in our calculation
of days sales outstanding and we use the annualized fourth
quarter cost of sales in our calculation of days cost of sales
in inventory. |
Accounts receivable at October 31, 2009 decreased
$14.3 million, or 5%, from the end of the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2008. The decrease in receivables was the result of lower
product shipments in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 as
compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Inventory at October 31, 2009 decreased by
$61.5 million, or 20%, from the end of the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2008. The decrease in inventory, despite a lower level
of sales, is primarily a result of significant reductions in
external manufacturing spending and additional factory shutdowns
in fiscal 2009.
Current liabilities decreased to $386.6 million at
October 31, 2009, a decrease of $182.4 million, or
32%, from $569.1 million at the end of fiscal 2008. This
decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in accrued
liabilities as a result of decreases in compensation and benefit
accruals and to a lesser extent a decrease in income taxes
payable as a result of lower profits in fiscal 2009 as compared
to fiscal 2008.
Net additions to property, plant and equipment including
discontinued operations, were $56.1 million in fiscal 2009,
$157.4 million in fiscal 2008 and $141.8 million in
fiscal 2007. We expect fiscal 2010 capital expenditures to be in
the range of $60 million to $70 million.
During fiscal 2009, our Board of Directors declared cash
dividends totaling $0.80 per outstanding share of common stock
resulting in aggregate dividend payments of $233.0 million.
After the end of the fiscal year, on November 19, 2009, our
Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per
outstanding share of our common stock. The dividend is payable
on December 23, 2009 to shareholders of record on
December 4, 2009 and is expected to total approximately
$58.4 million. The payment of future dividends, if any,
will be based on several factors, including our financial
performance, outlook and liquidity.
34
Our common stock repurchase program has been in place since
August 2004. In the aggregate, the Board of Directors has
authorized us to repurchase $4 billion of our common stock
under the program. Under the program, we may repurchase
outstanding shares of our common stock from time to time in the
open market and through privately negotiated transactions.
Unless terminated earlier by resolution of our Board of
Directors, the repurchase program will expire when we have
repurchased all shares authorized under the program. As of
October 31, 2009, we had repurchased a total of
approximately 114.7 million shares of our common stock for
approximately $3,908.4 million under this program and an
additional $91.6 million remains under the current
authorized program. The repurchased shares are held as
authorized but unissued shares of common stock. We also from
time to time repurchase shares in settlement of employee tax
withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock
or restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options. Any
future common stock repurchases will be based on several factors
including our financial performance, outlook, liquidity and the
amount of cash we have available to us in the United States.
On June 30, 2009, we issued $375 million aggregate
principal amount of 5.0% senior unsecured notes due
July 1, 2014 (the Notes) with annual interest payments of
5.0% paid in two installments on January 1 and July 1 of each
year, commencing January 1, 2010. The net proceeds of the
offering were $370.4 million, after issuing at a discount
and deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions,
which will be amortized over the term of the Notes. We swapped
the fixed interest portion of these Notes for a variable
interest rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.34%
as of October 31, 2009). The variable interest payments
based on the variable annual rate are payable quarterly. The
LIBOR based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date
of the interest payment. The indenture governing the Notes
contains covenants that may limit our ability to: incur, create,
assume or guarantee any debt for borrowed money secured by a
lien upon a principal property; enter into sale and lease-back
transactions with respect to a principal property; and
consolidate with or merge into, or transfer or lease all or
substantially all of our assets to, any other party. In
addition, we have a five-year $165 million unsecured
revolving credit facility that expires in May 2013. To date, we
have not borrowed under this credit facility but we may borrow
in the future and use the proceeds for support of commercial
paper issuance, stock repurchases, dividend payments,
acquisitions, capital expenditures, working capital and other
lawful corporate purposes.
At October 31, 2009, our principal source of liquidity was
$1,816 million of cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments. As of October 31, 2009, approximately
$412.7 million of our cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments were held in the United States. The
balance of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments was held outside the United States in various
foreign subsidiaries. As we intend to reinvest certain of our
foreign earnings indefinitely, this cash held outside the United
States is not available to meet certain of our cash requirements
in the United States, including for cash dividends and common
stock repurchases. If we are unable to address our
U.S. cash requirements through operations, by efficient and
timely repatriations of overseas cash, through borrowings under
our current credit facility or from other sources of cash
obtained at an acceptable cost, our business strategies and
operating results could be adversely affected.
The volatility in the credit markets has generally diminished
liquidity and capital availability in worldwide markets. We are
unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the
current disruptions in the credit and financial markets and
adverse global economic conditions. However, we believe that our
existing sources of liquidity and cash expected to be generated
from future operations, together with existing and anticipated
available long-term financing, will be sufficient to fund
operations, capital expenditures, research and development
efforts, dividend payments (if any) and purchases of stock (if
any) under our stock repurchase program in the immediate future
and for at least the next twelve months.
35
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations and the
amounts we owe under these contracts in specified periods as of
October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leasesa
|
|
$
|
80,782
|
|
|
$
|
24,735
|
|
|
$
|
27,905
|
|
|
$
|
9,887
|
|
|
$
|
18,255
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments associated with long-term debt
obligationsb
|
|
|
93,802
|
|
|
|
18,802
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due under interest rate swap
agreementsc
|
|
|
42,447
|
|
|
|
8,935
|
|
|
|
17,894
|
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
pland
|
|
|
7,940
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,577
|
|
Pension
fundinge
|
|
|
30,050
|
|
|
|
30,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
630,021
|
|
|
$
|
83,885
|
|
|
$
|
83,299
|
|
|
$
|
438,005
|
|
|
$
|
24,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Certain of our operating lease obligations include escalation
clauses. These escalating payment requirements are reflected in
the table. |
|
(b) |
|
These interest payments are expected to be offset by the
proceeds from our interest rate swap agreements. |
|
(c) |
|
These interest payments are based on a variable interest rate
based on the three month LIBOR plus 2.05%. The actual payments
will be based on the LIBOR based rate which is set quarterly
three months prior to the date of the interest payments plus
2.05%. |
|
(d) |
|
These payments relate to obligations under our deferred
compensation plan. The deferred compensation plan allows certain
members of management and other highly-compensated employees and
non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of
their compensation. The amount in the More than
5 Years column of the table represents the remaining
total balance under the deferred compensation plan to be paid to
participants who have not terminated employment. Since we cannot
reasonably estimate the timing of withdrawals for participants
who have not yet terminated employment we have included the
future obligation to these participants in the More than
5 Years column of the table. All other columns
represent installment payments to be made to those employees who
have retired or are on long-term disability, or as a result of
elections made by plan participants under the provisions of our
Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
(e) |
|
Our funding policy for our foreign defined benefit plans is
consistent with the local requirements of each country. The
payment obligations in the table are estimates of our expected
contributions to these plans for fiscal year 2010. The actual
future payments may differ from the amounts presented in the
table and reasonable estimates of payments beyond one year are
not practical because of potential future changes in variables
such as plan asset performance, interest rates and the rate of
increase in compensation levels. |
Purchase orders for the purchase of raw materials and other
goods and services are not included in the table above. We are
not able to determine the total amount of these purchase orders
that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may
represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding
agreements. In addition, our purchase orders generally allow for
cancellation without significant penalties. We do not have
significant agreements for the purchase of raw materials or
other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that
exceed our expected short-term requirements.
As of October 31, 2009, our total liabilities associated
with uncertain tax positions was $26.2 million, which are
included in Other non-current liabilities in our
Consolidated Balance Sheet contained in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Due to the complexity associated with our tax uncertainties, we
cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period in
which we expect to settle the non-current liabilities associated
with these uncertain tax positions. Therefore, we have not
included these uncertain tax positions in the above contractual
obligations table.
36
The expected timing of payments and the amounts of the
obligations discussed above are estimated based on current
information.
Off-balance
Sheet Financing
As of October 31, 2009, we had no off-balance sheet
financing arrangements.
Outlook
The following statements are based on current expectations.
These statements are forward-looking, and actual results may
differ materially. Unless specifically mentioned, these
statements do not give effect to the potential impact of any
mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, or business combinations
that may be announced or closed after the date of filing this
report. These statements supersede all prior statements
regarding our business outlook made by us.
We are planning for revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2010
to be approximately flat to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Our plan is for gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal
2010 to increase to approximately 58.0% to 58.5% as a result of
lower infrastructure costs and a richer mix of industrial sales.
We are planning for operating expenses, excluding one-time
restructuring items associated with the closure of our Cambridge
wafer fabrication facility, in the first quarter of fiscal 2010
to remain approximately flat to the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2009, in line with our plan to achieve higher operating
leverage going forward. As a result, our plan is for diluted EPS
from continuing operations to be approximately $0.36 to $0.37 in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010, excluding one-time
restructuring items associated with the closure of our Cambridge
wafer fabrication facility, which cannot be precisely determined
at this time.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-14
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That
Include Software Elements (formerly EITF Issue
No. 09-3).
This standard removes tangible products from the scope of
software revenue recognition guidance and also provides guidance
on determining whether software deliverables in an arrangement
that includes a tangible product are within the scope of the
software revenue guidance. More specifically, if the software
sold with or embedded within the tangible product is essential
to the functionality of the tangible product, then this
software, as well as undelivered software elements that relate
to this software, are excluded from the scope of existing
software revenue guidance. ASU
No. 2009-14
is effective for fiscal years that begin on or after
June 15, 2010, which is our fiscal year 2011. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that ASU
No. 2009-14
may have on our financial condition and results of operations.
Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-13
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements (formerly EITF Issue
No. 08-1).
This standard modifies the revenue recognition guidance for
arrangements that involve the delivery of multiple elements,
such as product, software, services or support, to a customer at
different times as part of a single revenue generating
transaction. This standard provides principles and application
guidance to determine whether multiple deliverables exist, how
the individual deliverables should be separated and how to
allocate the revenue in the arrangement among those separate
deliverables. The standard also expands the disclosure
requirements for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU
No. 2009-13
is effective for fiscal years that begin on or after
June 15, 2010, which is our fiscal year 2011. We are
currently evaluating the impact, if any, that ASU
No. 2009-13
may have on our financial condition and results of operations.
37
Variable
Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to
FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167).
SFAS 167 requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to
determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to
assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to
ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when
determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of
the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. SFAS 167 is effective
for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2009, which
is our fiscal year 2011. We are currently evaluating the impact,
if any, that SFAS 167 may have on our financial condition
and results of operations.
Transfers
of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 changes the way
entities account for securitizations and other transfers of
financial instruments. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal
years that begin after November 15, 2009, which is our
fiscal year 2011. We are currently evaluating the impact, if
any, that SFAS 166 may have on our financial condition and
results of operations.
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC
805-10
(formerly SFAS 141R, Business
Combinations). ASC
805-10
requires an acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair value on
the acquisition date. It further requires that
acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs be recognized
separately from the acquisition. In April 2009, the FASB updated
ASC 805-10
to amend the provisions for the initial recognition and
measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and
disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations. This update also
eliminates the distinction between contractual and
non-contractual contingencies. ASC
805-10 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, which is our fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating
the impact, if any, that this rule may have on our financial
condition and results of operations. The adoption of ASC
805-10 will
change our accounting treatment for business combinations on a
prospective basis beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year
2010.
Noncontrolling
Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC810-10 (formerly
SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements). ASC
810-10
clarifies that a noncontrolling or minority interest in a
subsidiary is considered an ownership interest and, accordingly,
requires all entities to report such interests in subsidiaries
as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This topic
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, which is our fiscal year 2010. We are currently evaluating
the impact, if any, that this rule may have on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of the financial
condition and results of operations is based upon the
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We
base our estimates and judgments on historical experience,
knowledge of current conditions and beliefs of what could occur
in the future based on available information. We consider the
following accounting policies to be both those most important to
the portrayal of our financial condition and those that require
the most subjective judgment. If actual results differ
significantly from managements estimates and projections,
there could be a material effect on our financial statements. We
also have other policies that we consider key accounting
policies, such as our policy for revenue recognition, including
the deferral of revenue on sales to distributors until
38
the products are sold to the end user; however, the application
of these policies does not require us to make significant
estimates or judgments that are difficult or subjective.
Inventory
Valuation
We value inventories at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out method) or market. Because of the cyclical nature of
the semiconductor industry, changes in inventory levels,
obsolescence of technology, and product life cycles, we write
down inventories to net realizable value. We employ a variety of
methodologies to determine the net realizable value of
inventory. While a portion of the calculation is determined via
reference to the age of inventory and lower of cost or market
calculations, an element of the calculation is subject to
significant judgments made by us about future demand for our
inventory. If actual demand for our products is less than our
estimates, additional adjustments to existing inventories may
need to be recorded in future periods. To date, our actual
results have not been materially different than our estimates,
and we do not expect them to be materially different in the
future.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts, when appropriate,
for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our
customers to make required payments. If the financial condition
of our customers were to deteriorate, our actual losses may
exceed our estimates, and additional allowances would be
required. To date, our actual results have not been materially
different than our estimates, and we do not expect them to be
materially different in the future.
Long-Lived
Assets
We review property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by
comparison of their carrying value to future undiscounted cash
flows that the assets are expected to generate over their
remaining economic lives. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the
amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their
fair value determined by either a quoted market price, if any,
or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow
technique. Although we have recognized no material impairment
adjustments related to our property, plant, and equipment and
identified intangible assets during the past three fiscal years,
except those made in conjunction with restructuring actions,
deterioration in our business in the future could lead to such
impairment adjustments in future periods. Evaluation of
impairment of long-lived assets requires estimates of future
operating results that are used in the preparation of the
expected future undiscounted cash flows. Actual future operating
results and the remaining economic lives of our long-lived
assets could differ from the estimates used in assessing the
recoverability of these assets. These differences could result
in impairment charges, which could have a material adverse
impact on our results of operations. In addition, in certain
instances, assets may not be impaired but their estimated useful
lives may have decreased. In these situations, we amortize the
remaining net book values over the revised useful lives.
Goodwill
Goodwill is subject to annual impairment tests, or earlier if
indicators of potential impairment exist and suggest that the
carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable from estimated
discounted future cash flows. We test goodwill for impairment at
the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below
an operating segment) on an annual basis in the fourth quarter
or more frequently if we believe indicators of impairment exist.
The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The
first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair
values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate
carrying values, including goodwill. We generally determine the
fair value of our reporting units using the income approach
methodology of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow
method as well as other generally accepted valuation
methodologies, which requires significant judgment by
management. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds
the reporting units fair value, we perform the second step
of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of
impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test
involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected
reporting units goodwill with the carrying value of that
goodwill. These impairment tests may result in impairment losses
that could have a material adverse impact on our results of
operations.
39
Accounting
for Income Taxes
We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining
income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These
estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits,
benefits, and deductions, and in the calculation of certain tax
assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the
timing of the recognition of revenue and expense for tax and
financial statement purposes, as well as the interest and
penalties relating to these uncertain tax positions. We assessed
the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets and
concluded that a valuation allowance is needed to reserve the
amount of the deferred tax assets that may not be realized due
to the expiration of certain state credit carryovers. In
reaching our conclusion, we evaluated certain relevant criteria
including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be
used to absorb deferred tax assets, the taxable income in prior
carryback years in the impacted state jurisdictions that can be
used to absorb net operating losses and taxable income in future
years. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change
due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or
international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any,
may require material adjustments to these deferred tax assets,
resulting in a reduction in net income or an increase in net
loss in the period when such determinations are made, which in
turn, may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision
in a subsequent period.
On November 4, 2007 (the first day of our 2008 fiscal
year), we adopted new accounting principles on accounting for
uncertain tax positions. These principles requires companies to
determine that it is more likely than not that a tax
position will be sustained by the appropriate taxing authorities
before any benefit can be recorded in the financial statements.
An uncertain income tax position is not recognized if it has
less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. For those tax
positions where it is more likely than not that a tax benefit
will be sustained, we have recorded the largest amount of tax
benefit with a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that
has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income
tax positions where it is not more likely than not that a tax
benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in
the financial statements. We reevaluate these uncertain tax
positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on
factors including, but not limited to, changes in known facts or
circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues
under audit, and new audit activity. A change in these factors
would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision.
In the ordinary course of global business, there are many
transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is
uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of
cost reimbursement and royalty arrangements among related
entities. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, no
assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these
matters will not be different than that which is reflected in
our historical income tax provisions and accruals. In the event
our assumptions are incorrect, the differences could have a
material impact on our income tax provision and operating
results in the period in which such determination is made.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options
and related awards is recognized in the statement of income.
Determining the amount of stock-based compensation to be
recorded requires us to develop estimates to be used in
calculating the grant-date fair value of stock options. We
calculate the grant-date fair values using the Black-Scholes
valuation model. The use of valuation models requires us to make
estimates of the following assumptions:
Expected volatility We are responsible for
estimating volatility and have considered a number of factors,
including third-party estimates, when estimating volatility. We
currently believe that the exclusive use of implied volatility
results in the best estimate of the grant-date fair value of
employee stock options because it reflects the markets
current expectations of future volatility. In evaluating the
appropriateness of exclusively relying on implied volatility, we
concluded that: (1) options in our common stock are
actively traded with sufficient volume on several exchanges;
(2) the market prices of both the traded options and the
underlying shares are measured at a similar point in time to
each other and on a date close to the grant date of the employee
share options; (3) the traded options have exercise prices
that are both
near-the-money
and close to the exercise price of the employee share options;
and (4) the maturities of the traded options used to
estimate volatility are at least one year.
40
Expected term We use historical employee
exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected
term assumption for the Black-Scholes grant-date valuation. We
believe that this historical data is currently the best estimate
of the expected term of a new option, and that generally, all of
our employees exhibit similar exercise behavior. In general, the
longer the expected term used in the Black-Scholes valuation
model, the higher the grant-date fair value of the option.
Risk-free interest rate The yield on
zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is
commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the
risk-free interest rate.
Expected dividend yield Expected dividend
yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by
our Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that
result by the closing stock price on the date of grant of the
option. Until such time as our Board of Directors declares a
cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current
quarters cash dividend, the current dividend will be used
in deriving this assumption. Cash dividends are not paid on
options, restricted stock or restricted stock units.
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during
a period is based on the value of the portion of the awards that
are ultimately expected to vest. Forfeitures are estimated at
the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The
term forfeitures is distinct from
cancellations or expirations and
represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered option.
Based on an analysis of our historical forfeitures, we have
applied an annual forfeiture rate of 4.3% to all unvested
stock-based awards as of October 31, 2009. The rate of 4.3%
represents the portion that is expected to be forfeited each
year over the vesting period. This analysis is re-evaluated
quarterly and the forfeiture rate is adjusted as necessary.
Ultimately, the actual expense recognized over the vesting
period will only be for those awards that vest.
Contingencies
From time to time, we receive notices that our products or
manufacturing processes allegedly infringe the patent or
intellectual property rights of others. We periodically assess
each matter to determine if a contingent liability should be
recorded. In making this determination, we may, depending on the
nature of the matter, consult with internal and external legal
counsel and technical experts. Based on the information we
obtain, combined with our judgment regarding all the facts and
circumstances of each matter, we determine whether it is
probable that a contingent loss may be incurred and whether the
amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. If a loss is
probable and reasonably estimable, we record a contingent loss.
In determining the amount of a contingent loss, we consider
advice received from experts in the specific matter, current
status of legal proceedings, settlement negotiations that may be
ongoing, prior case history and other factors. If the judgments
and estimates made by us are incorrect, we may need to record
additional contingent losses that could materially adversely
impact our results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Interest
Rate Exposure
Based on our marketable securities and short term investments
outstanding as of October 31, 2009 and November 1,
2008, our annual interest income would change by approximately
$20 million and $14 million, respectively, for each
100 basis point increase in interest rates.
To provide a meaningful assessment of the interest rate risk
associated with our investment portfolio, we performed a
sensitivity analysis to determine the impact a change in
interest rates would have on the value of our investment
portfolio assuming a 100 basis point parallel shift in the
yield curve. Based on investment positions as of
October 31, 2009, a hypothetical 100 basis point
increase in interest rates across all maturities would result in
a $3 million incremental decline in the fair market value
of the portfolio. As of November 1, 2008, a similar
100 basis point shift in the yield curve would have
resulted in a $2 million incremental decline in the fair
market value of the portfolio. Such losses would only be
realized if we sold the investments prior to maturity.
In June 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to
hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $375 million
5.0% senior unsecured notes due July 1, 2014. The
effect of the swap was to convert our 5.0% fixed
41
interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the
three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.34% as of October 31,
2009). If LIBOR changes by 100 basis points, our annual
interest expense would change by $3.8 million.
Foreign
Currency Exposure
As more fully described in Note 2i. in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we regularly hedge our
non-U.S. dollar-based
exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange
contracts. The terms of these contracts are for periods matching
the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from
one month to twelve months. Currently, our largest foreign
currency exposure is the Euro, primarily because our European
operations have the highest proportion of our local currency
denominated expenses. Relative to foreign currency exposures
existing at October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008, a
10% unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over
the course of the year would not expose us to significant losses
in earnings or cash flows because we hedge a high proportion of
our year-end exposures against fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates.
The market risk associated with our derivative instruments
results from currency exchange rate or interest rate movements
that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying
transactions, assets and liabilities being hedged. The
counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign
exchange instruments consist of a number of major international
financial institutions with high credit ratings. We do not
believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by
these counterparties because we continually monitor the credit
ratings of such counterparties. While the contract or notional
amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure
of the volume of these transactions, they do not represent the
amount of our exposure to credit risk. The amounts potentially
subject to credit risk (arising from the possible inability of
counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts) are
generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the
counterparties obligations under the contracts exceed our
obligations to the counterparties.
The following table illustrates the effect that a 10%
unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange
rates, relative to the U.S. dollar, would have on the fair
value of our forward exchange contracts as of October 31,
2009 and November 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009
|
|
November 1, 2008
|
|
Fair value of forward exchange contracts asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
6,427
|
|
|
$
|
(23,158
|
)
|
Fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% unfavorable
movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
20,132
|
|
|
$
|
(9,457
|
)
|
Fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% favorable
movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability
|
|
$
|
(6,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,294
|
)
|
The calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in
the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar. In addition
to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates, such changes
typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency
sales price as competitors products become more or less
attractive. Our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a
potential change in sales levels or local currency selling
prices.
42
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,429,721
|
|
Revenue from one-time IP license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
2,464,721
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales(1)
|
|
|
896,271
|
|
|
|
1,005,656
|
|
|
|
956,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
1,118,637
|
|
|
|
1,577,275
|
|
|
|
1,508,276
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
|
446,980
|
|
|
|
533,480
|
|
|
|
509,553
|
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative(1)
|
|
|
333,184
|
|
|
|
415,682
|
|
|
|
389,505
|
|
Special charges
|
|
|
53,656
|
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
40,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833,820
|
|
|
|
952,250
|
|
|
|
939,553
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations
|
|
|
284,817
|
|
|
|
625,025
|
|
|
|
568,723
|
|
Nonoperating (income) expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(15,621
|
)
|
|
|
(41,041
|
)
|
|
|
(77,007
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(15,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,627
|
)
|
|
|
(41,077
|
)
|
|
|
(92,734
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
297,444
|
|
|
|
666,102
|
|
|
|
661,457
|
|
Provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable currently
|
|
|
38,441
|
|
|
|
152,294
|
|
|
|
162,403
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
11,595
|
|
|
|
(11,369
|
)
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,036
|
|
|
|
140,925
|
|
|
|
159,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
247,408
|
|
|
|
525,177
|
|
|
|
502,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
12,779
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
261,107
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
247,772
|
|
|
$
|
786,284
|
|
|
$
|
496,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share Basic
|
|
|
291,385
|
|
|
|
292,688
|
|
|
|
323,255
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share Diluted
|
|
|
292,698
|
|
|
|
297,110
|
|
|
|
332,301
|
|
Earnings per share Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Earnings per share Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
7,469
|
|
|
$
|
7,806
|
|
|
$
|
10,591
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
22,666
|
|
|
|
23,768
|
|
|
|
29,347
|
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
18,478
|
|
|
|
20,970
|
|
|
|
27,329
|
|
See accompanying Notes.
43
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
October 31,
2009 and November 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
639,729
|
|
|
$
|
593,599
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
1,176,244
|
|
|
|
716,087
|
|
Accounts receivable less allowances of $1,681 ($5,501 in 2008)
|
|
|
301,036
|
|
|
|
315,290
|
|
Inventories(1)
|
|
|
253,161
|
|
|
|
314,629
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
78,740
|
|
|
|
102,676
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
40,363
|
|
|
|
40,460
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,490,636
|
|
|
|
2,089,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
395,151
|
|
|
|
378,187
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,511,822
|
|
|
|
1,512,984
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
56,294
|
|
|
|
63,071
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
66,847
|
|
|
|
65,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030,114
|
|
|
|
2,019,489
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,553,598
|
|
|
|
1,452,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
476,516
|
|
|
|
567,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments
|
|
|
6,580
|
|
|
|
31,099
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
250,881
|
|
|
|
235,175
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
73,646
|
|
|
|
65,949
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
35,658
|
|
|
|
26,461
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
62,037
|
|
|
|
62,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
437,142
|
|
|
|
433,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,404,294
|
|
|
$
|
3,090,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
107,334
|
|
|
$
|
130,451
|
|
Deferred income on shipments to distributors
|
|
|
149,278
|
|
|
|
175,358
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
52,546
|
|
Deferred compensation plan liability
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
122,193
|
|
|
|
191,307
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
386,613
|
|
|
|
569,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
379,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
36,232
|
|
|
|
14,310
|
|
Deferred compensation plan liability
|
|
|
6,577
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
66,097
|
|
|
|
55,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
488,532
|
|
|
|
101,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 471,934 shares
authorized, none outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock,
$0.162/3
par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized,
291,861,767 shares issued and outstanding (291,193,451 on
November 1, 2008)
|
|
|
48,645
|
|
|
|
48,533
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,490,752
|
|
|
|
2,419,908
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(10,248
|
)
|
|
|
(48,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,529,149
|
|
|
|
2,420,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,404,294
|
|
|
$
|
3,090,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $2,718 and $2,632 related to stock-based compensation
at October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008, respectively. |
See accompanying Notes.
44
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Years
ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
BALANCE, OCTOBER 28, 2006
|
|
|
342,000
|
|
|
$
|
57,001
|
|
|
$
|
3,378,999
|
|
|
$
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock under stock plans and other, net of repurchases
|
|
|
7,291
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
107,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit-stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounting principle related to defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,361
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,991
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(45,937
|
)
|
|
|
(7,656
|
)
|
|
|
(1,639,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, NOVEMBER 3, 2007
|
|
|
303,354
|
|
|
|
50,560
|
|
|
|
2,253,483
|
|
|
|
33,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock under stock plans and other, net of repurchases
|
|
|
7,256
|
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
|
92,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit-stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,269
|
)
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(19,417
|
)
|
|
|
(3,236
|
)
|
|
|
(566,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, NOVEMBER 1, 2008
|
|
|
291,193
|
|
|
|
48,533
|
|
|
|
2,419,908
|
|
|
|
(48,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in defined benefit plan measurement date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock under stock plans and other, net of repurchases
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
12,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (deficit)-stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,930
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(3,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, OCTOBER 31, 2009
|
|
|
291,862
|
|
|
$
|
48,645
|
|
|
$
|
2,490,752
|
|
|
$
|
(10,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes.
45
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
Years
ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
247,408
|
|
|
$
|
525,177
|
|
|
$
|
502,123
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
14,840
|
|
|
|
(42,370
|
)
|
|
|
10,640
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding (losses) gains (net of taxes of $347 in
2009, $372 in 2008 and $2,746 in 2007) on securities
classified as short-term investments
|
|
|
(2,456
|
)
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) (net of taxes of $197 in
2009, $217 in 2008 and $100 in 2007) on securities
classified as other investments
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on securities
|
|
|
(2,090
|
)
|
|
|
2,908
|
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of derivatives (net of taxes of $5,496 in
2009, $1,622 in 2008 and $846 in 2007)
|
|
|
35,529
|
|
|
|
(10,663
|
)
|
|
|
5,282
|
|
Realized (gain) loss reclassification (net of taxes of $1,609 in
2009, $2,420 in 2008 and $107 in 2007)
|
|
|
(9,657
|
)
|
|
|
(15,912
|
)
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges
|
|
|
25,872
|
|
|
|
(26,575
|
)
|
|
|
5,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of taxes of $0 in
2009, $0 in 2008 and $640 in 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation (net of taxes of $1 in 2009 and $4 in 2008)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss (net of taxes of $287 in 2009 and $1,971 in
2008)
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
|
|
(15,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service income (net of taxes of $1 in 2009 and $4 in
2008)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive loss
pension plans (net of taxes of $286 in 2009 and
$1,963 in 2008)
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
(15,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
37,930
|
|
|
|
(81,269
|
)
|
|
|
22,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income from continuing operations
|
|
|
285,338
|
|
|
|
443,908
|
|
|
|
525,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
261,107
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
285,702
|
|
|
$
|
705,015
|
|
|
$
|
519,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 3, 2007 as a result of a change in accounting
principle related to defined benefit plans the Company recorded
a $10.4 million adjustment, net of tax of
$1.4 million, to accumulated other comprehensive income.
This adjustment has been excluded from the above presentation of
comprehensive income for fiscal year 2007.
See accompanying Notes.
46
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years
ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
247,772
|
|
|
$
|
786,284
|
|
|
$
|
496,907
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
132,493
|
|
|
|
144,222
|
|
|
|
142,173
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
7,377
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
12,610
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
48,613
|
|
|
|
50,247
|
|
|
|
72,652
|
|
Gain on sale of business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,919
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
Non-cash portion of special charges
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
Other non-cash activity
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
Excess tax benefit stock options
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(18,586
|
)
|
|
|
(40,871
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11,595
|
|
|
|
(11,369
|
)
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
|
|
|
16,561
|
|
|
|
48,903
|
|
|
|
(27,011
|
)
|
Decrease in inventories
|
|
|
67,347
|
|
|
|
16,784
|
|
|
|
16,549
|
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
6,557
|
|
|
|
34,890
|
|
Decrease (increase) in deferred compensation plan investments
|
|
|
24,097
|
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
|
|
(4,755
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, deferred income and
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(100,064
|
)
|
|
|
(60,736
|
)
|
|
|
53,693
|
|
(Decrease) increase in deferred compensation plan liability
|
|
|
(24,801
|
)
|
|
|
(3,811
|
)
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
Income tax payments related to gain on sale of businesses
|
|
|
(4,105
|
)
|
|
|
(110,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in income taxes payable
|
|
|
(24,909
|
)
|
|
|
41,443
|
|
|
|
53,119
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
12,330
|
|
|
|
14,198
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
184,376
|
|
|
|
(116,916
|
)
|
|
|
323,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
432,148
|
|
|
|
669,368
|
|
|
|
820,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
(2,787,141
|
)
|
|
|
(1,831,363
|
)
|
|
|
(1,807,476
|
)
|
Maturities of short-term
available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
2,324,181
|
|
|
|
1,774,391
|
|
|
|
2,943,468
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
(56,095
|
)
|
|
|
(157,408
|
)
|
|
|
(141,810
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,003
|
|
Net (expenditures) proceeds from sale of businesses
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
403,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions
|
|
|
(8,360
|
)
|
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
|
|
(9,160
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(5,661
|
)
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
(8,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(534,729
|
)
|
|
|
188,363
|
|
|
|
984,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
370,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments to shareholders
|
|
|
(232,988
|
)
|
|
|
(222,530
|
)
|
|
|
(228,281
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(3,762
|
)
|
|
|
(569,853
|
)
|
|
|
(1,647,212
|
)
|
Net proceeds from employee stock plans
|
|
|
12,377
|
|
|
|
94,155
|
|
|
|
109,149
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit stock options
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18,586
|
|
|
|
40,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
|
|
145,997
|
|
|
|
(680,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,725,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
|
|
(9,096
|
)
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
46,130
|
|
|
|
168,627
|
|
|
|
81,025
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
593,599
|
|
|
|
424,972
|
|
|
|
343,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
639,729
|
|
|
$
|
593,599
|
|
|
$
|
424,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes.
47
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
(all tabular amounts in thousands except per share
amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Analog Devices, Inc. (Analog Devices or the
Company) is a world leader in the design,
manufacture and technical support of high-performance analog,
mixed-signal and digital signal processing integrated circuits
used in industrial, communication, computer and consumer
applications. Since the Companys inception in 1965, it has
focused on solving the engineering challenges associated with
signal processing in electronic equipment. The Companys
signal processing products convert real-world phenomena such as
light, sound, temperature, motion and pressure into electrical
signals to be used in a wide array of electronic equipment. Used
by over 60,000 customers worldwide, the Companys products
are embedded inside many types of electronic equipment including
industrial process controls, factory automation systems, defense
electronics, portable wireless communications devices, cellular
basestations, central office networking equipment, computers,
automobiles, medical equipment, digital cameras and digital
televisions. Signal processing technology is a critical element
of high-speed communications, digital entertainment, and other
consumer, computer and industrial applications. As new
generations of digital applications evolve, they generate new
needs for high-performance analog signal processing, digital
signal processing, or DSP, and power management technology. The
Company produces a wide range of products to address the
sensing, conditioning, conversion, processing, and power needs
of a broad base of customers.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
|
|
a.
|
Principles
of Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and all of its subsidiaries. Upon consolidation, all
intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Amounts
pertaining to the non-controlling ownership interest held by a
third party in the operating results and financial position of
the Companys majority-owned subsidiaries are reported as
minority interest. The Companys fiscal year is
the 52-week or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to
the last day in October. Fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008
were 52-week periods and fiscal year 2007 was a 53-week period.
Certain amounts reported in previous years have been
reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2009 presentation. Such
reclassifications were immaterial.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company sold its
baseband chipset business and related support operations
(Baseband Chipset Business) to MediaTek Inc. and sold its CPU
voltage regulation and PC thermal monitoring business to certain
subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation. The Company has
reflected the financial results of these businesses as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income
for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of these
businesses are reflected as assets and liabilities of
discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheets as of
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008. The historical
results of operations of these businesses have been segregated
from the Companys consolidated financial statements and
are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
of tax, in the consolidated statements of income.
|
|
b.
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments
|
Cash and cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with
insignificant interest rate risk and maturities of three months
or less at the time of acquisition. Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments consist primarily of corporate
obligations such as commercial paper and corporate bonds and
institutional money market funds. They also include bank time
deposits.
The Company classifies its investments in readily marketable
debt and equity securities as
held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale
or trading at the time of purchase. There were no
transfers between investment classifications in any of the
fiscal years presented.
Held-to-maturity
securities, which are carried at amortized cost, include only
those securities the Company has the positive intent and ability
to hold to maturity. Securities, such as bank time deposits,
which by their nature are typically held to maturity, are
classified as such. The Companys other readily
48
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
marketable cash equivalents and short-term investments are
classified as
available-for-sale.
Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and
losses, net of related tax, reported in accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income. The Companys deferred
compensation plan investments are classified as trading.
See Note 7 for additional information on the Companys
deferred compensation plan investments. No realized gains or
losses were recorded during any of the fiscal years presented.
The Company periodically evaluates these investments for
impairment. There were no
other-than-temporary
impairments of short-term investments in any of the fiscal years
presented.
There were no unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
securities classified as short-term investments at
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008.
Unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
securities classified as short-term investments at
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities classified as short term
investments
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains in 2009 and 2008 relate to corporate
obligations.
There were no cash equivalents or short-term investments
classified as trading at October 31, 2009 and
November 1, 2008. All of the Companys short-term
investments were classified as
available-for-sale.
All short-term securities at October 31, 2009 have
maturities less than one year. The components of the
Companys cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
as of October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
30,744
|
|
|
$
|
27,910
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional money market funds
|
|
|
553,295
|
|
|
|
197,735
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
50,981
|
|
|
|
321,200
|
|
Held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro time deposits
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
46,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
639,729
|
|
|
$
|
593,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with one year or less to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
$
|
1,176,244
|
|
|
$
|
716,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,176,244
|
|
|
$
|
716,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost of the Companys investments classified
as corporate obligations as of October 31, 2009 and
November 1, 2008 was $1,137.9 million and
$991.3 million, respectively.
|
|
c.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Statement Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash paid during the fiscal year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
60,609
|
|
|
$
|
201,974
|
|
|
$
|
102,349
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
2,502
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
49
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out method) or market. The valuation of inventory requires
the Company to estimate obsolete or excess inventory as well as
inventory that is not of saleable quality. The Company employs a
variety of methodologies to determine the net realizable value
of its inventory. While a portion of the calculation to record
inventory at its net realizable value is based on the age of the
inventory and lower of cost or market calculations, a key factor
in estimating obsolete or excess inventory requires the Company
to estimate the future demand for its products. If actual demand
is less than the Companys estimates, impairment charges,
which are recorded to cost of sales, may need to be recorded in
future periods. Inventory in excess of saleable amounts is not
valued, and the remaining inventory is valued at the lower of
cost or market.
Inventories at October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
13,373
|
|
|
$
|
15,350
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
173,696
|
|
|
|
200,436
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
66,092
|
|
|
|
98,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
253,161
|
|
|
$
|
314,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost less
allowances for depreciation. The straight-line method of
depreciation is used for all classes of assets for financial
statement purposes; both straight-line and accelerated methods
are used for income tax purposes. Leasehold improvements are
amortized based upon the lesser of the term of the lease or the
useful life of the asset. Repairs and maintenance charges are
expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are based on
the following useful lives:
|
|
|
Buildings & building equipment
|
|
Up to 25 years
|
Machinery & equipment
|
|
3-8 years
|
Office equipment
|
|
3-8 years
|
Depreciation expense from continuing operations of property,
plant and equipment was $132 million, $144 million and
$139 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company reviews property, plant, and equipment for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of
their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the
assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic
lives. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by
which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value
determined by either a quoted market price, if any, or a value
determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique. If
such assets are not impaired, but their useful lives have
decreased, the remaining net book value is amortized over the
revised useful life.
|
|
f.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
The Company annually evaluates goodwill for impairment as well
as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the
carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company
tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level
(operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on
an annual basis in the fourth quarter or more frequently if
indicators of impairment exist. The performance of the test
involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment
test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable
50
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
reporting units with their aggregate carrying values, including
goodwill. The Company generally determines the fair value of its
reporting units using the income approach methodology of
valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method as well
as other generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting
units fair value, the Company performs the second step of
the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of
impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test
involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected
reporting units goodwill with the carrying value of that
goodwill. No impairment of goodwill resulted from the
Companys most recent evaluation of goodwill for
impairment, which occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
No impairment of goodwill resulted in any of the fiscal years
presented. The Companys next annual impairment assessment
will be made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 unless
indicators arise that would require the Company to reevaluate at
an earlier date. The following table presents the changes in
goodwill during fiscal 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
235,175
|
|
|
$
|
279,469
|
|
Acquisition of AudioAsics(1)
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Integrant Technologies(2)
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
Goodwill allocated to sale of businesses(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,649
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
10,537
|
|
|
|
(34,633
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
250,881
|
|
|
$
|
235,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company made its final milestone payment related to this
2006 acquisition in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company purchased the remaining outstanding minority shares
related to this 2006 acquisition during fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2009, which resulted in an additional $3.0 million and
$2.1 million, respectively, of goodwill. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company allocated $12.6 million of goodwill in
connection with the sale of its Baseband Chipset Business to
MediaTek Inc. and the sale of its CPU voltage regulation and PC
thermal monitoring business to ON Semiconductor Corporation in
fiscal 2008. |
Intangible
Assets
The Company reviews identified intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying
value to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected
to generate over their remaining economic lives. If such assets
are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized
in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the
assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted
market price, if any, or a value determined by utilizing a
discounted cash flow technique.
Intangible assets, which will continue to be amortized,
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009
|
|
|
November 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Technology-based
|
|
$
|
39,924
|
|
|
$
|
34,213
|
|
|
$
|
36,516
|
|
|
$
|
25,731
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
3,022
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
6,534
|
|
|
|
6,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
53,165
|
|
|
$
|
46,310
|
|
|
$
|
49,017
|
|
|
$
|
36,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over
their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of
amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern
of economic use. The remaining amortization expense will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
0.9 years.
Amortization expense from continuing operations, related to
intangibles was $7.4 million, $9.3 million and
$9.2 million in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company expects annual amortization expense for these
intangible assets to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years
|
|
Amortization Expense
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
5,425
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,430
|
|
Certain of the Companys foreign subsidiaries have received
various grants from governmental agencies. These grants include
capital, employment and research and development grants. Capital
grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted
against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a
credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the
related asset. Employment grants, which relate to employee
hiring and training, and research and development grants are
recognized in earnings in the period in which the related
expenditures are incurred by the Company.
|
|
h.
|
Translation
of Foreign Currencies
|
The functional currency for the Companys foreign sales and
research and development operations is the applicable local
currency. Gains and losses resulting from translation of these
foreign currencies into U.S. dollars are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Transaction gains
and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated
assets and liabilities are included in income currently,
including those at the Companys principal foreign
manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the
U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses
included in other expenses, net, were not material in fiscal
2009, 2008 or 2007.
|
|
i.
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Agreements
|
Foreign Exchange Exposure Management The
Company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts
to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from
the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such
exposures result from the portion of the Companys
operations, assets and liabilities that are denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro;
other exposures include the Philippine Peso and the British
Pound. These foreign currency exchange contracts are entered
into to support transactions made in the normal course of
business, and accordingly, are not speculative in nature. The
contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the
underlying transactions, generally one year or less. Hedges
related to anticipated transactions are designated and
documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash
flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly.
Derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize
certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently
identified and quantified. As the terms of the contract and the
underlying transaction are matched at inception, forward
contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in
fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of
the anticipated transaction, with the effective portion of the
gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (OCI)
in shareholders equity and reclassified into earnings in
the same period during which the hedged transaction affects
earnings. Any residual change in fair value of the instruments,
or ineffectiveness, is recognized immediately in other
income/expense. Additionally, the Company enters into forward
foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and
losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets
and liabilities in a non-functional currency. Changes in the
fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other
income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the
fair value of the asset or liability being hedged.
52
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of October 31, 2009, the total notional amount of these
undesignated hedges was $38 million. The fair value of
these hedging instruments in the Companys condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2009 was
immaterial.
Interest Rate Exposure Management On
June 30, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate swap
transactions related to its outstanding notes where the Company
swapped the notional amount of its $375 million of fixed
rate debt at 5.0% into floating interest rate debt through
July 1, 2014. Under the terms of the swaps, the Company
will (i) receive on the $375 million notional amount a
5.0% annual interest payment that is paid in two installments on
the 1st of every January and July, commencing January 1,
2010 through and ending on the maturity date; and (ii) pay
on the $375 million notional amount an annual three-month
LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.34% as of October 31,
2009) interest payment, payable in four installments on the
1st of every January, April, July and October, commencing on
October 1, 2009 and ending on the maturity date. The LIBOR
based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of
the interest payment. The Company designated these swaps as fair
value hedges. The fair value of the swaps at inception were zero
and subsequent changes in the fair value of the interest rate
swaps were reflected in the carrying value of the interest rate
swaps on the balance sheet. The carrying value of the debt on
the balance sheet was adjusted by an equal and offsetting
amount. The gain or loss on the hedged item (that is fixed-rate
borrowings) attributable to the hedged benchmark interest rate
risk and the offsetting gain or loss on the related interest
rate swaps as of October 31, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) on
|
|
Gain/(Loss)
|
|
Net Income
|
Income Statement Classification
|
|
Swaps
|
|
on Note
|
|
Effect
|
|
Other income
|
|
$
|
6,109
|
|
|
$
|
(6,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
The amounts earned and owed under the swap agreements are
accrued each period and are reported in interest expense. There
was no ineffectiveness recognized in any of the periods
presented.
The market risk associated with the Companys derivative
instruments results from currency exchange rate or interest rate
movements that are expected to offset the market risk of the
underlying transactions, assets and liabilities being hedged.
The counterparties to the agreements relating to the
Companys derivative instruments consist of a number of
major international financial institutions with high credit
ratings. The Company does not believe that there is significant
risk of nonperformance by these counterparties because the
Company continually monitors the credit ratings of such
counterparties. Furthermore, none of the Companys
derivative transactions are subject to collateral or other
security arrangements and none contain provisions that are
dependent on the Companys credit ratings from any credit
rating agency. While the contract or notional amounts of
derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the
volume of these transactions, they do not represent the amount
of the Companys exposure to credit risk. The amounts
potentially subject to credit risk (arising from the possible
inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their
contracts) are generally limited to the amounts, if any, by
which the counterparties obligations under the contracts
exceed the obligations of the Company to the counterparties. As
a result of the above considerations, the Company does not
consider the risk of counterparty default to be significant.
The Company records the fair value of its derivative financial
instruments in the consolidated financial statements in other
current assets, other assets or accrued liabilities, depending
on their net position, regardless of the purpose or intent for
holding the derivative contract. Changes in the fair value of
the derivative financial instruments are either recognized
periodically in earnings or in shareholders equity as a
component of OCI. Changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges
are recorded in OCI and reclassified into earnings when the
underlying contract matures. Changes in the fair values of
derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting are reported in
earnings as they occur.
The total notional amount of derivative instruments designated
as hedging instruments as of October 31, 2009 is as
follows: $375 million of interest rate swap agreements
accounted as fair value hedges, and $128.0 million of
53
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
cash flow hedges denominated in Euros, British Pounds and
Philippine Pesos. The fair value of these hedging instruments in
our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of October 31,
2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
6,109
|
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
6,460
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow
hedges on our condensed consolidated statement of income for
fiscal 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Gain recognized in OCI on derivatives, net of tax of $5,496
|
|
$
|
35,529
|
|
Loss reclassified from OCI into income, net of tax of $1,609
|
|
$
|
(9,657
|
)
|
The amounts reclassified into earnings before tax are recognized
in cost of sales and operating expenses as follows:
$4.9 million in cost of sales, $3.6 million in
research and development and $2.8 million in selling,
marketing, general and administrative. All derivative gains and
losses included in OCI will be reclassified into earnings within
the next 12 months. There was no ineffectiveness during the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2009.
Accumulated
Derivative Gains or Losses
The following table summarizes activity in accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income related to derivatives classified as
cash flow hedges held by the Company during the period from
November 4, 2007 through October 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,312
|
|
Changes in fair value of derivatives gain (loss),
net of tax
|
|
|
35,529
|
|
|
|
(10,663
|
)
|
Reclassifications into earnings from other comprehensive loss ,
net of tax
|
|
|
(9,657
|
)
|
|
|
(15,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
5,609
|
|
|
$
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the accumulated gain will be reclassified into earnings
over the next twelve months.
|
|
j.
|
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
|
The Company defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. The Company applies the following fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair
value into three levels and bases the categorization within the
hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and
significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy gives
the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs
(Level 3 measurements).
Level 1 Level 1 inputs are quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date.
Level 2 Level 2 inputs are inputs
other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified
(contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which there is
little, if any market activity for the asset or liability at the
measurement date. As of October 31, 2009, the Company held
no assets or liabilities valued using Level 3 inputs during
the period.
54
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below sets forth by level the Companys financial
assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as
of October 31, 2009. The table does not include cash on
hand and also does not include assets and liabilities that are
measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value measurement at
|
|
|
|
Portion of
|
|
|
Reporting Date using:
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Measured at
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional money market funds
|
|
$
|
553,295
|
|
|
$
|
553,295
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
50,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,981
|
|
Euro time deposits
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
Short term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
|
1,176,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176,244
|
|
Other Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
6,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,109
|
|
Deferred compensation investments
|
|
|
7,943
|
|
|
|
7,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
|
6,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,427
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
1,807,193
|
|
|
$
|
562,723
|
|
|
$
|
1,244,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
379,626
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
379,626
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company
in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial
instruments:
Cash equivalents and short-term
investments These investments are adjusted
to fair value based on quoted market prices or are determined
using a yield curve model based on current market rates.
Deferred compensation plan investments and other
investments The fair value of these
investments is based on quoted market prices.
Long-term debt The fair value of
long-term debt is based on quoted market values.
Interest rate swap agreements The fair
value of interest rate swap agreements is based on quotes
received from third party banks. These values represent the
estimated amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate
the agreements taking into consideration current interest rates
as well as the creditworthiness of the counterparty.
Forward foreign currency exchange
contracts The estimated fair value of
forward foreign currency exchange contracts, which includes
derivatives that are accounted for as cash flow hedges and those
that are not designated as cash flow hedges, is based on the
estimated amount the Company would receive to sell these
agreements at the reporting date taking into consideration
current interest rates as well as the creditworthiness of the
counterparty for assets and our creditworthiness for liabilities.
55
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses
during the reporting period. Such estimates relate to the useful
lives of fixed assets and identified intangible assets,
allowances for doubtful accounts and customer returns, the net
realizable value of inventory, potential reserves relating to
litigation matters, accrued liabilities, accrued taxes, deferred
tax valuation allowances, assumptions pertaining to share-based
payments and other reserves. Actual results could differ from
those estimates, and such differences may be material to the
financial statements.
|
|
l.
|
Concentrations
of Risk
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of investments
and trade accounts receivable.
The Company maintains cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments and long-term investments with high credit quality
financial institutions and monitors the amount of credit
exposure to any one issuer.
The Company sells its products to distributors and original
equipment manufacturers involved in a variety of industries
including industrial process automation, instrumentation,
defense/aerospace, automotive, communications, computers and
computer peripherals and consumer electronics. The Company has
adopted credit policies and standards to accommodate growth in
these markets. The Company performs continuing credit
evaluations of its customers financial condition and
although the Company generally does not require collateral, the
Company may require letters of credit from customers in certain
circumstances. The Company provides reserves for estimated
amounts of accounts receivable that may not be collected.
|
|
m.
|
Concentration
of Other Risks
|
The semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid
technological change, competitive pricing pressures and cyclical
market patterns. The Companys financial results are
affected by a wide variety of factors, including general
economic conditions worldwide, economic conditions specific to
the semiconductor industry, the timely implementation of new
manufacturing technologies, the ability to safeguard patents and
intellectual property in a rapidly evolving market and reliance
on assembly and test subcontractors, third-party wafer
fabricators and independent distributors. In addition, the
semiconductor market has historically been cyclical and subject
to significant economic downturns at various times. The Company
is exposed to the risk of obsolescence of its inventory
depending on the mix of future business. Additionally, a large
portion of the Companys purchases of external wafer and
foundry services are from a limited number of suppliers,
primarily Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). If
TSMC or any of the Companys other key suppliers are unable
or unwilling to manufacture and deliver sufficient quantities of
components, on the time schedule and of the quality that the
Company requires, the Company may be forced to engage additional
or replacement suppliers, which could result in significant
expenses and disruptions or delays in manufacturing, product
development and shipment of product to the Companys
customers. Although the Company has experienced shortages of
components, materials and external foundry services from time to
time, these items have generally been available to the Company
as needed.
Revenue from product sales to customers is generally recognized
when title passes, which for shipments to certain foreign
countries is subsequent to product shipment. Title for these
shipments ordinarily passes within a week of shipment. A reserve
for sales returns and allowances for customers is recorded based
on historical experience or specific identification of an event
necessitating a reserve.
56
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In all regions of the world, the Company defers revenue and the
related cost of sales on shipments to distributors until the
distributors resell the products to their customers. Therefore,
the Companys product revenue fully reflects end customer
purchases and is not impacted by distributor inventory levels.
Sales to distributors are made under agreements that allow
distributors to receive price adjustment credits, as discussed
below, and to return qualifying products for credit, as
determined by the Company, in order to reduce the amounts of
slow-moving, discontinued or obsolete product from their
inventory. These agreements limit such returns to a certain
percentage of the value of the Companys shipments to that
distributor during the prior quarter. In addition, distributors
are allowed to return unsold products if the Company terminates
the relationship with the distributor.
Distributors are granted price-adjustment credits related to
many of their sales to their customers. Price adjustment credits
are granted when the distributors standard cost (i.e., the
Companys sales price to the distributor) does not provide
the distributor with an appropriate margin on its sales to its
customers. As distributors negotiate selling prices with their
customers, the final sales price agreed to with the customer
will be influenced by many factors, including the particular
product being sold, the quantity ordered, the particular
customer, the geographic location of the distributor, and the
competitive landscape. As a result, the distributor may request
and receive a price adjustment credit from the Company to allow
the distributor to earn an appropriate margin on the transaction.
Distributors are also granted price adjustment credits in the
event of a price decrease subsequent to the date the product was
shipped and billed to the distributor. Generally, the Company
will provide a credit equal to the difference between the price
paid by the distributor (less any prior credits on such
products) and the new price for the product multiplied by the
quantity of such product in the distributors inventory at
the time of the price decrease.
Given the uncertainties associated with the levels of price
adjustment credits to be granted to distributors, the sales
price to the distributor is not fixed or determinable until the
distributor resells the products to their customers. Therefore,
the Company defers revenue recognition from sales to
distributors until the distributors have sold the products to
their customers.
Title to the inventory transfers to the distributor at the time
of shipment or delivery to the distributor, and payment from the
distributor is due in accordance with the Companys
standard payment terms. These payment terms are not contingent
upon the distributors sale of the products to their
customers. Upon title transfer to distributors, inventory is
reduced for the cost of goods shipped, the margin (sales less
cost of sales) is recorded as deferred income on shipments
to distributors, net and an account receivable is recorded.
The deferred costs of sales to distributors have historically
had very little risk of impairment due to the margins the
Company earns on sales of its products and the relatively long
life-cycle of the Companys products. Product returns from
distributors that are ultimately scrapped have historically been
immaterial. In addition, price protection and price adjustment
credits granted to distributors historically have not exceeded
the margins the Company earns on sales of its products. The
Company continuously monitors the level and nature of product
returns and is in continuous contact with the distributors to
ensure reserves are established for all known material issues.
As of October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008, the
Company had gross deferred revenue of $230.8 million and
$279.3 million, respectively, and gross deferred cost of
sales of $81.5 million and $103.9 million,
respectively. Deferred income on shipments to distributors
decreased by $26.1 million in fiscal 2009 as a result of
the distributors sales to their customers in fiscal 2009
exceeding the Companys shipments to its distributors
during this same time period.
Shipping costs are charged to cost of sales as incurred.
The Company generally offers a
12-month
warranty for its products. The Companys warranty policy
provides for replacement of the defective product. Specific
accruals are recorded for known product warranty issues. Product
warranty expenses during fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007 were not
material.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded
revenue of $35 million received in exchange for licensing
of certain intellectual property rights to a third party.
57
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
o.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income includes certain transactions
that have generally been reported in the consolidated statement
of shareholders equity. The components of accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income at October 31, 2009 and
November 1, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
(8,688
|
)
|
|
|
(8,025
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(7,476
|
)
|
|
|
(22,316
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
|
(20,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(10,248
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense
was $5.2 million in fiscal 2009, $10.0 million in
fiscal 2008 and $10.2 million in fiscal 2007.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets
and liabilities and are measured using the enacted income tax
rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the
temporary differences are expected to reverse. Additionally,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are separated into current
and noncurrent amounts based on the classification of the
related assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes.
|
|
r.
|
Earnings
Per Share of Common Stock
|
Basic earnings per share is computed based only on the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period,
plus the dilutive effect of potential future issuances of common
stock relating to stock option programs and other potentially
dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. In
calculating diluted earnings per share, the dilutive effect of
stock options is computed using the average market price for the
respective period. In addition, the assumed proceeds under the
treasury stock method include the average unrecognized
compensation expense of stock options that are
in-the-money.
This results in the assumed buyback of additional
shares, thereby reducing the dilutive impact of stock options.
Potential shares related to certain of the Companys
outstanding stock options were excluded because they were
anti-dilutive. Those potential shares, determined based on the
weighted average exercise prices during the respective years,
related to the Companys outstanding stock options could be
dilutive in the future.
58
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
247,408
|
|
|
$
|
525,177
|
|
|
$
|
502,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
261,107
|
|
|
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
247,772
|
|
|
$
|
786,284
|
|
|
$
|
496,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
291,385
|
|
|
|
292,688
|
|
|
|
323,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.79
|
|
|
$
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
291,385
|
|
|
|
292,688
|
|
|
|
323,255
|
|
Assumed exercise of common stock equivalents
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
4,422
|
|
|
|
9,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares
|
|
|
292,698
|
|
|
|
297,110
|
|
|
|
332,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average anti-dilutive shares related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding stock options
|
|
|
55,827
|
|
|
|
57,364
|
|
|
|
49,915
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the individual per share amounts may not equal due to
rounding. |
|
|
s.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on
the grant-date fair value of the awards ultimately expected to
vest and is recognized as an expense, on a straight-line basis,
over the vesting period, which is generally five years.
Determining the amount of stock-based compensation to be
recorded requires the Company to develop estimates used in
calculating the grant-date fair value of stock options. The
Company calculates the grant-date fair value using the
Black-Scholes valuation model. The use of valuation models
requires the Company to make estimates of assumptions such as
expected volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate,
expected dividend yield and forfeiture rates.
See Note 3 for additional information relating to
stock-based compensation.
|
|
t.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-14
Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That
Include Software Elements (formerly EITF Issue
No. 09-3).
This standard removes tangible products from the scope of
software revenue recognition guidance and also provides guidance
on determining whether software deliverables in an arrangement
that includes a tangible product are within the scope of the
software revenue
59
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
guidance. More specifically, if the software sold with or
embedded within the tangible product is essential to the
functionality of the tangible product, then this software, as
well as undelivered software elements that relate to this
software, are excluded from the scope of existing software
revenue guidance. ASU
No. 2009-14
is effective for fiscal years that begin on or after
June 15, 2010, which is the Companys fiscal year
2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
that ASU
No. 2009-14
may have on the Companys financial condition and results
of operations.
Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2009-13
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements (formerly EITF Issue
No. 08-1).
This standard modifies the revenue recognition guidance for
arrangements that involve the delivery of multiple elements,
such as product, software, services or support, to a customer at
different times as part of a single revenue generating
transaction. This standard provides principles and application
guidance to determine whether multiple deliverables exist, how
the individual deliverables should be separated and how to
allocate the revenue in the arrangement among those separate
deliverables. The standard also expands the disclosure
requirements for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU
No. 2009-13
is effective for fiscal years that begin on or after
June 15, 2010, which is the Companys fiscal year
2011. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
that ASU
No. 2009-13
may have on the Companys financial condition and results
of operations.
Variable
Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to
FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167).
SFAS 167 requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to
determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to
assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to
ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when
determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of
the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. SFAS 167 is effective
for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2009, which
is the Companys fiscal year 2011. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 167 may have on
the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Transfers
of Financial Assets
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 changes the way
entities account for securitizations and other transfers of
financial instruments. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal
years that begin after November 15, 2009, which is the
Companys fiscal year 2011. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 166 may have on
the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC
805-10
(formerly SFAS 141R, Business
Combinations). ASC
805-10
requires an acquiring entity in a business combination to
recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their fair value on
the acquisition date. It further requires that
acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs be recognized
separately from the acquisition. In April 2009 the FASB updated
ASC 805-10
to amend the provisions for the initial recognition and
measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and
disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations. This update also
eliminates the distinction between contractual and
non-contractual contingencies. ASC
805-10 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, which is the Companys fiscal year 2010. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this rule may
have on the Companys financial
60
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
condition and results of operations. The adoption of ASC
805-10 will
change the Companys accounting treatment for business
combinations on a prospective basis beginning in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Noncontrolling
Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC
810-10
(formerly SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements). ASC
810-10
clarifies that a noncontrolling or minority interest in a
subsidiary is considered an ownership interest and, accordingly,
requires all entities to report such interests in subsidiaries
as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This topic
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, which is the Companys fiscal year 2010. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that this rule may
have on the Companys financial condition and results of
operations.
|
|
u.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
In November 2007, the Company entered into a purchase and sale
agreement with certain subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor
Corporation to sell the Companys CPU voltage regulation
and PC thermal monitoring business which consists of core
voltage regulator products for the central processing unit in
computing and gaming applications and temperature sensors and
fan-speed controllers for managing the temperature of the
central processing unit. During the first quarter of fiscal
2008, the Company completed the sale of this business for net
cash proceeds of $138 million, which was net of other cash
payments of approximately $1.4 million. The Company made
final additional cash payments of approximately
$2.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. In
connection with the purchase and sale agreement,
$7.5 million was placed into escrow and was excluded from
the gain calculations. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008 of $78 million, or
$43 million net of tax, which was recorded as a gain on
sale of discontinued operations. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2008, additional proceeds were released from escrow and
an additional pre-tax gain of $6.6 million, or
$3.8 million net of tax, was recorded as a gain on sale of
discontinued operations. Additionally, at the time of the sale,
the Company entered into a one-year manufacturing supply
agreement with a subsidiary of ON Semiconductor Corporation for
an additional $37 million. The Company has allocated the
proceeds from this arrangement based on the fair value of the
two elements of this transaction: 1) the sale of a business
and 2) the obligation to manufacture product for a one-year
period. As a result, $85 million was recorded as a
liability related to the manufacturing supply agreement, all of
which has been utilized. The liability was included in current
liabilities of discontinued operations on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. The Company recorded the revenue
associated with this manufacturing supply agreement in
discontinued operations. As a result, the Company classified
inventory for this arrangement as a current asset of
discontinued operations. The Company may receive additional
proceeds of up to $1 million, currently held in escrow,
upon the resolution of certain contingent items, which would be
recorded as additional gain from the sale of discontinued
operations.
In September 2007, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to sell its Baseband Chipset Business to MediaTek Inc.
The decision to sell the Baseband Chipset Business was due to
the Companys decision to focus its resources in areas
where its signal processing expertise can provide unique
capabilities and earn superior returns. On January 11,
2008, the Company completed the sale of its Baseband Chipset
Business for net cash proceeds of $269 million. The cash
proceeds received were net of a refundable withholding tax of
$62 million and other cash payments of approximately
$9 million. The Company made additional cash payments of
$7.8 million during fiscal 2008, primarily related to
transaction fees and retention payments to employees that
transferred to MediaTek Inc. The Company made additional cash
payments of $1.7 million during fiscal 2009 related to
retention payments for employees who transferred to MediaTek Inc
and for the reimbursement of intellectual property license fees
incurred by MediaTek Inc. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain in
fiscal 2008 of $278 million, or $202 million net of
tax, which is recorded as a gain on sale of discontinued
operations. The Company may receive additional proceeds of up to
$10 million, currently held in escrow, upon the resolution
of certain contingent items, which would be recorded as
additional gain from the sale of discontinued operations.
61
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company received additional amounts under various transition
service agreements entered into in connection with these
dispositions. The transition service agreements included
manufacturing, engineering support and certain human resource
services and information technology systems support. At the time
of the disposition, the Company evaluated the nature of the
transition services and concluded the services would be
primarily completed within the one-year assessment period, and
the Company did not have the ability to exert significant
influence over the disposed businesses operating and
financial policies. Accordingly, the Company concluded that it
did not have a significant continuing involvement with the
disposed businesses and has presented the disposition of these
businesses as discontinued operations.
The following amounts related to the CPU voltage regulation and
PC thermal monitoring and baseband chipset businesses have been
segregated from continuing operations and reported as
discontinued operations. These amounts also include the revenue
and costs of sales provided under a manufacturing supply
agreement between the Company and a subsidiary of ON
Semiconductor Corporation, which terminated during the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
10,332
|
|
|
$
|
115,600
|
|
|
$
|
275,106
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
10,847
|
|
|
|
95,070
|
|
|
|
197,965
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
80,977
|
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
10,639
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
368,173
|
|
|
|
(14,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(895
|
)
|
|
|
107,066
|
|
|
|
(9,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
261,107
|
|
|
$
|
(5,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2009
|
|
|
November 1, 2008
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reclassified to current assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refundable foreign withholding tax
|
|
$
|
62,037
|
|
|
$
|
62,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets reclassified to non-current assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
$
|
62,037
|
|
|
$
|
62,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,540
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities reclassified to current liabilities of
discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation and Shareholders Equity
|
Equity
Compensation Plans
The Company grants, or has granted, stock options and other
stock and stock-based awards under The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan
(2006 Plan). The 2006 Plan was approved by the Companys
Board of Directors on January 23, 2006 and was approved by
shareholders on March 14, 2006 and subsequently amended in
March 2006, June 2009 and September 2009. The 2006 Plan provides
for the grant of up to 15 million shares of the
Companys common stock, plus such number of additional
shares that were subject to outstanding options under the
Companys previous plans that are not issued because the
applicable option award subsequently terminates or expires
without being
62
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
exercised. The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of incentive
stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, non-statutory stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
stock units and other stock-based awards. Employees, officers,
directors, consultants and advisors of the Company and its
subsidiaries are eligible to be granted awards under the 2006
Plan. No award may be made under the 2006 Plan after
March 13, 2016, but awards previously granted may extend
beyond that date. The Company will not grant further options
under any previous plans.
While the Company may grant to employees options that become
exercisable at different times or within different periods, the
Company has generally granted to employees options that vest
over five years and become exercisable in annual installments of
20% on each of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth
anniversaries of the date of grant;
331/3%
on each of the third, fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the
date of grant; or in annual installments of 25% on each of the
second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of
grant. The maximum contractual term of all options is ten years.
Grant-Date
Fair Value
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
calculate the grant-date fair value of an award. Information
pertaining to the Companys stock option awards and the
related estimated weighted-average assumptions to calculate the
fair value of stock options granted are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program
|
|
|
2009*
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Options granted (in thousands)
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
20,873
|
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
|
Weighted-average exercise prices-stock options
|
|
$
|
19.63
|
|
|
$
|
25.74
|
|
|
$
|
29.79
|
|
|
$
|
33.52
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value-stock options
|
|
$
|
7.42
|
|
|
$
|
5.97
|
|
|
$
|
7.90
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected volatility
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
|
|
41.3
|
%
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
Weighted-average expected term (in years)
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes options granted under the stock option exchange program
which is described below. |
Expected volatility The Company is responsible for
estimating volatility and has considered a number of factors,
including third-party estimates, when estimating volatility. The
Company currently believes that the exclusive use of implied
volatility results in the best estimate of the grant-date fair
value of employee stock options because it reflects the
markets current expectations of future volatility. In
evaluating the appropriateness of exclusively relying on implied
volatility, the Company concluded that: (1) options in the
Companys common stock are actively traded with sufficient
volume on several exchanges; (2) the market prices of both
the traded options and the underlying shares are measured at a
similar point in time to each other and on a date close to the
grant date of the employee share options; (3) the traded
options have exercise prices that are both
near-the-money
and close to the exercise price of the employee share options;
and (4) the maturities of the traded options used to
estimate volatility are at least one year.
Expected term The Company uses historical employee
exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected
term assumption for the Black-Scholes grant-date valuation. The
Company believes that this historical data is currently the best
estimate of the expected term of a new option, and that
generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior.
Risk-free interest rate The yield on zero-coupon
U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate
with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free
interest rate.
63
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expected dividend yield Expected dividend yield is
calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the
Companys Board of Directors for the current quarter and
dividing that result by the closing stock price on the date of
grant. Until such time as the Companys Board of Directors
declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from
the current quarters cash dividend, the current dividend
will be used in deriving this assumption. Cash dividends are not
paid on options, restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during
a period is based on the value of the awards that are ultimately
expected to vest. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term
forfeitures is distinct from
cancellations or expirations and
represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered
stock-based award. Based on an analysis of its historical
forfeitures, the Company has applied an annual forfeiture rate
of 4.3% to all unvested stock-based awards as of
October 31, 2009. The rate of 4.3% represents the portion
that is expected to be forfeited each year over the vesting
period. This analysis will be re-evaluated quarterly and the
forfeiture rate will be adjusted as necessary. Ultimately, the
actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be
for those options that vest.
Stock-option
Exchange
During fiscal 2009, shareholders approved and the Company
completed an employee stock option exchange program (Option
Exchange). The Option Exchange provided eligible employees of
the Company, except named executive officers and directors, the
opportunity to exchange eligible stock option grants for a
smaller number of new stock options, with a lower exercise
price, or in some instances, cash, that had approximately the
same fair value as the options surrendered.
On September 28, 2009 the Company granted stock options for
approximately 15.2 million shares in the aggregate to
approximately 3,100 employees who elected to participate in
the Option Exchange. The new stock options issued were subject
to a new vesting period and a new contractual term based on the
grant date of the original options. In addition, the Company
made cash payments of approximately $2.6 million to
approximately 5,100 employees whose exchanged options would
each have resulted in a new stock option for fewer than
100 shares. As a result of the exchange, employees elected
to surrender options for approximately 33.6 million
options, which were cancelled upon the grant of the new options
on September 28, 2009.
The exchange of options in this Option Exchange is treated as a
modification of the existing stock options for accounting
purposes. Accordingly, any unrecognized compensation expense
from the surrendered stock options will be recognized over the
original service period of the surrendered option. Because the
exchange ratios were calculated to result in the fair value of
surrendered eligible stock options that was approximately equal
to the fair value of the new stock options replacing them, the
amount of incremental expense was immaterial.
64
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-Based
Compensation Activity
A summary of the activity under the Companys stock option
plans as of October 31, 2009 and changes during the fiscal
year then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Term in Years
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding at November 1, 2008
|
|
|
70,340
|
|
|
$
|
36.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
$
|
19.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
$
|
19.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(992
|
)
|
|
$
|
33.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(3,313
|
)
|
|
$
|
39.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted under Option Exchange
|
|
|
15,198
|
|
|
$
|
28.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled under Option Exchange
|
|
|
(33,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
40.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding October 31, 2009
|
|
|
52,463
|
|
|
$
|
29.71
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
66,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at October 31, 2009
|
|
|
24,484
|
|
|
$
|
32.39
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
33,129
|
|
Options vested or expected to vest
October 31, 2009(1)
|
|
|
50,481
|
|
|
$
|
29.84
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
$
|
63,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to the vested options, the Company expects a portion
of the unvested options to vest at some point in the future.
Options expected to vest is calculated by applying an estimated
forfeiture rate to the unvested options. |
The total intrinsic value of options exercised (i.e. the
difference between the market price at exercise and the price
paid by the employee to exercise the options) during fiscal
2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 was $4.7 million,
$121.7 million and $152.6 million, respectively. The
total amount of proceeds received by the Company from exercise
of these options during fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007
was $15.1 million, $100.6 million and
$109.1 million, respectively. The total grant-date fair
value of stock options that vested during fiscal 2009, fiscal
2008 and fiscal 2007 was approximately $73.6 million,
$77.6 million and $72.8 million, respectively.
The total cash received from stock option exercises pursuant to
employee stock plans in the Companys statement of cash
flows is net of the value of shares surrendered by employees to
satisfy employee tax obligations upon vesting of restricted
stock or restricted stock units and in connection with the
exercise of stock options granted to the Companys
employees under the Companys equity compensation plans.
The withholding amount is based on the Companys minimum
statutory withholding requirement.
A summary of the Companys restricted stock and restricted
stock unit award activity as of October 31, 2009 and
changes during the year then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Restricted shares and units outstanding at November 1,
2008
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
30.41
|
|
Awards granted
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
17.14
|
|
Restrictions lapsed
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
33.30
|
|
Awards forfeited
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
33.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares and units outstanding at October 31,
2009
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
22.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of October 31, 2009, there was $103.4 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
share-based awards comprised of stock options and restricted
shares. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
Information with respect to activity under the Companys
stock option plans is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair-Value Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Stock Award Activity
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price Per Share
|
|
|
Balance, October 28, 2006
|
|
|
17,970
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
35.35
|
|
|
|
84,461
|
|
|
$
|
34.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares cancelled upon termination of stock plans
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted awards granted(1)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
34.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions lapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
36.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(7,691
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
|
|
|
33.52
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,252
|
)
|
|
|
15.06
|
|
Options forfeited or expired
|
|
|
4,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,742
|
)
|
|
|
40.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 3, 2007
|
|
|
14,898
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
34.97
|
|
|
|
80,158
|
|
|
$
|
35.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares cancelled upon termination of stock plans
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted awards granted(1)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
27.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions lapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
35.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted awards forfeited
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
31.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(5,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,827
|
|
|
|
29.79
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,418
|
)
|
|
|
13.56
|
|
Options forfeited or expired
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,227
|
)
|
|
|
40.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 1, 2008
|
|
|
17,162
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
30.41
|
|
|
|
70,340
|
|
|
$
|
36.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares cancelled upon termination of stock plans
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted awards granted(1)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
17.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions lapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
33.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted awards forfeited
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
33.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(5,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
19.63
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
19.28
|
|
Options forfeited or expired
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,305
|
)
|
|
|
38.22
|
|
Options granted under Option Exchange
|
|
|
(15,198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,198
|
|
|
|
28.02
|
|
Options cancelled under Option Exchange(2)
|
|
|
15,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,660
|
)
|
|
|
40.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2009
|
|
|
15,585
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
22.19
|
|
|
|
52,463
|
|
|
$
|
29.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2006 Plan provides that for purposes of determining the
number of shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan, any
restricted stock award, restricted stock unit or other
stock-based award with a per share or per unit price lower than
the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant
(a Full-Value Award) will be counted as three shares
for each share subject to the Full-Value Award. |
|
(2) |
|
Per the terms of the option exchange program, shares underlying
options surrendered that were not exchanged for new options are
no longer available for future grants. |
66
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of October 31, 2009, a total of 68,183,182 common shares
were reserved for issuance under the Companys stock option
plans.
Common
Stock Repurchase Program
The Companys common stock repurchase program has been in
place since August 2004. In the aggregate, the Board of
Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase
$4 billion of the Companys common stock under the
program. Under the program, the Company may repurchase
outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the
open market and through privately negotiated transactions.
Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Companys
Board of Directors, the repurchase program will expire when the
Company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program.
As of October 31, 2009, the Company had repurchased a total
of approximately 114.7 million shares of its common stock
for approximately $3,908.4 million under this program. An
additional $91.6 million of shares remains available for
repurchase under the current authorized program. The repurchased
shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common
stock. The Company also from time to time repurchases shares in
settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the
vesting of restricted stock or restricted stock units, or the
exercise of stock options. Any future common stock repurchases
will be dependent upon several factors including the amount of
cash available to the Company in the United States, and the
Companys financial performance, outlook and liquidity.
Preferred
Stock
The Company has 471,934 authorized shares of $1.00 par
value preferred stock, none of which is issued or outstanding.
The Board of Directors is authorized to fix designations,
relative rights, preferences and limitations on the preferred
stock at the time of issuance.
|
|
4.
|
Industry,
Segment and Geographic Information
|
The Company operates and tracks its results in one reportable
segment based on the aggregation of three operating segments.
The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad
range of integrated circuits. The Chief Executive Officer has
been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker.
Revenue
Trends by End Market
The categorization of revenue by end market is determined using
a variety of data points including the technical characteristics
of the product, the sold to customer information,
the ship to customer information and the end
customer product or application into which the Companys
product will be incorporated. As data systems for capturing and
tracking this data evolve and improve, the categorization of
products by end market can vary over time. When this occurs, the
Company reclassifies revenue by end market for prior periods.
Such reclassifications typically do not materially change the
sizing of, or the underlying trends of results within, each end
market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Y/Y%
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue**
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
$
|
1,049,158
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,386,874
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,323,252
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Communications
|
|
|
512,941
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
590,267
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
477,645
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
400,290
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
512,339
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
523,793
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Computer
|
|
|
52,519
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(44
|
)%
|
|
|
93,451
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
105,031
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Product Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,429,721
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from one-time IP license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,464,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
* |
|
The year ended November 3, 2007 was a 53-week year. The
Company follows a 52-week, or
364-day
fiscal calendar that results in a 53-week year approximately
every seventh year, as occurred in fiscal 2007. |
|
** |
|
The sum of the individual percentages do not equal the total due
to rounding. |
Revenue
Trends by Product
The following table summarizes revenue by product categories.
The categorization of the Companys products into broad
categories is based on the characteristics of the individual
products, the specification of the products and in some cases
the specific uses that certain products have within
applications. The categorization of products into categories is
therefore subject to judgment in some cases and can vary over
time. In instances where products move between product
categories the Company reclassifies the amounts in the product
categories for all prior periods. Such reclassifications
typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the
underlying trends of results within, each product category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue**
|
|
|
Y/Y%
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue**
|
|
|
Converters
|
|
$
|
960,502
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
$
|
1,190,866
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,104,932
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Amplifiers
|
|
|
501,759
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
|
|
665,585
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
618,267
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Other analog
|
|
|
261,059
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
318,648
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
334,652
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal analog signal processing
|
|
|
1,723,320
|
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
2,175,099
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
2,057,851
|
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power management & reference
|
|
|
118,247
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
143,698
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
124,101
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total analog products
|
|
$
|
1,841,567
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,318,797
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,181,952
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General purpose DSP
|
|
|
167,133
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
234,946
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
214,339
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other DSP
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(79
|
)%
|
|
|
29,188
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
33,430
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DSP products
|
|
$
|
173,341
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
$
|
264,134
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
247,769
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Product Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,429,721
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from one-time IP license
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,464,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The year ended November 3, 2007 was a 53-week year. The
Company follows a 52-week, or
364-day
fiscal calendar that results in a 53-week year approximately
every seventh year, as occurred in fiscal 2007. |
|
** |
|
The sum of the individual percentages may not equal the total
due to rounding. |
68
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic
Information
The Company operates in the following major geographic areas.
Product revenue data is based upon customer location and
property, plant and equipment data is based upon physical
location. In fiscal year 2009 the predominant countries
comprising Rest of North and South America are
Canada and Mexico; the predominant countries comprising
Europe are Germany, Sweden and France; and the
predominant countries comprising Rest of Asia are
Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. In fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year
2007 the predominant countries comprising Rest of North
and South America are Canada and Mexico; the predominant
countries comprising Europe are Germany, France and
the United Kingdom; and the predominant countries comprising
Rest of Asia are Taiwan and Korea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Product Revenue from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
401,608
|
|
|
$
|
524,197
|
|
|
$
|
551,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of North and South America
|
|
|
92,954
|
|
|
|
97,449
|
|
|
|
82,761
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
502,602
|
|
|
|
679,778
|
|
|
|
598,334
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
349,907
|
|
|
|
503,059
|
|
|
|
506,514
|
|
China
|
|
|
376,080
|
|
|
|
401,060
|
|
|
|
310,211
|
|
Rest of Asia
|
|
|
291,757
|
|
|
|
377,388
|
|
|
|
380,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal all foreign countries
|
|
|
1,613,300
|
|
|
|
2,058,734
|
|
|
|
1,878,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenue
|
|
$
|
2,014,908
|
|
|
$
|
2,582,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,429,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
204,758
|
|
|
$
|
251,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
155,428
|
|
|
|
186,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
103,209
|
|
|
|
116,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other countries
|
|
|
13,121
|
|
|
|
12,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal all foreign countries
|
|
|
271,758
|
|
|
|
315,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
476,516
|
|
|
$
|
567,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the Companys special charges is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Product
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
of a Wafer
|
|
|
Reduction of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Reduction of
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
Facility in
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Special
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
in Sunnyvale
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Limerick
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
in Cambridge
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions
|
|
$
|
20,315
|
|
|
$
|
11,165
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2005 Charges
|
|
$
|
20,315
|
|
|
$
|
11,165
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Abandonment of equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Change in estimate
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
Workforce reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2006 Charges
|
|
$
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,819
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007 Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility closure costs
|
|
|
10,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,288
|
|
Workforce reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
|
13,748
|
|
|
|
10,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,624
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
Change in estimate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2007 Charges
|
|
$
|
10,288
|
|
|
$
|
4,111
|
|
|
$
|
13,748
|
|
|
$
|
12,348
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
Change in estimate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2008 Charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,627
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 Charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,583
|
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
|
34,029
|
|
Facility closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
Non-cash impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
14,629
|
|
|
|
15,468
|
|
Other items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fiscal 2009 Charges
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,333
|
|
|
$
|
22,132
|
|
|
$
|
53,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Product
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
of a Wafer
|
|
|
Reduction of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure of Wafer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Reduction of
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Support
|
|
|
Facility in
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
Special
|
|
Accrued Restructuring
|
|
in Sunnyvale
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Limerick
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
in Cambridge
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Balance at October 28, 2006
|
|
$
|
5,903
|
|
|
$
|
4,976
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007 special charges
|
|
|
10,288
|
|
|
|
4,111
|
|
|
|
13,748
|
|
|
|
12,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,495
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
(5,573
|
)
|
|
|
(4,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,057
|
)
|
Facility closure costs
|
|
|
(6,616
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,639
|
)
|
Non-cash impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
Other payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency on accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 3, 2007
|
|
$
|
4,002
|
|
|
$
|
3,769
|
|
|
$
|
13,748
|
|
|
$
|
11,146
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008 special charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(2,178
|
)
|
|
|
(1,727
|
)
|
|
|
(8,085
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,369
|
)
|
Facility closure costs
|
|
|
(2,002
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,326
|
)
|
Other payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,355
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency on accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(1,449
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,522
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at November 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,747
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
11,754
|
|
|
$
|
1,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,501
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 special charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,333
|
|
|
|
22,132
|
|
|
|
53,656
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
(11,802
|
)
|
|
|
(1,816
|
)
|
|
|
(21,156
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
(36,971
|
)
|
Facility closure costs
|
|
|
(1,578
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(1,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(4,019
|
)
|
Non-cash impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
(14,629
|
)
|
|
|
(15,468
|
)
|
Other payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency on accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,161
|
|
|
$
|
6,690
|
|
|
$
|
15,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special
Charges
Closure
of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Sunnyvale
The Company ceased production at its California wafer
fabrication facility in November 2006. The Company is paying the
lease obligation costs on a monthly basis over the remaining
lease term, which expires in 2010. The Company completed the
clean-up
activity during fiscal 2007, and does not expect to incur any
additional charges related to this action.
Reorganization
of Product Development and Support Programs
The Company recorded special charges in fiscal years 2005, 2006
and 2007 as a result of its decision to reorganize its product
development and support programs with the goal of providing
greater focus on its analog and
71
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
digital signal processing product programs. The Company
terminated the employment of all employees associated with these
programs and has paid out all amounts owed to employees for
severance. The Company does not expect to incur any further
charges related to this reorganization action.
Consolidation
of a Wafer Fabrication Facility in Limerick
In fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a special charge of
$13.7 million as a result of its decision to only use
eight-inch technology at its wafer fabrication facility in
Limerick. Certain manufacturing processes and products produced
on the Limerick facilitys six-inch production line have
transitioned to the Companys existing eight-inch
production line in Limerick while others have transitioned to
external foundries. The charge was for severance and fringe
benefit costs recorded under the Companys ongoing benefit
plan for 150 manufacturing employees associated with this
action. As of October 31, 2009, the Company still employed
2 of the 150 employees included in this action. These
employees must continue to be employed by the Company until
their employment is involuntarily terminated in order to receive
the severance benefit. During fiscal 2008, the Company recorded
an additional charge of $1.5 million related to this
action, of which $1.2 million was an adjustment to the
original estimate of the severance costs and $0.3 million
was for
clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. During fiscal
2009, the Company recorded additional charges of
$1.2 million for
clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. The production in
the six-inch wafer fabrication facility ceased during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company does not expect to incur any
further charges related to this action.
Reduction
of Overhead Infrastructure Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a
special charge as a result of its decision to either deemphasize
or exit certain businesses or products and focus investments in
products and end markets where it has better opportunities for
profitable growth. In September 2007, the Company entered into a
definitive agreement to sell its Baseband Chipset Business. As a
result, the Company decided to reduce the support infrastructure
in manufacturing, engineering and SMG&A to more
appropriately reflect its required overhead structure. The
Company terminated the employment of all employees associated
with this action and has paid all amounts owed to employees for
severance as income continuance. The Company does not expect to
incur any further charges related to this action.
Reduction
of Operating Costs
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, in order to further
reduce its operating cost structure, the Company recorded a
special charge of $1.6 million for severance and fringe
benefit costs recorded under its ongoing benefit plan or
statutory requirements at foreign locations for 19 engineering
and SMG&A employees. The Company terminated the employment
of all employees associated with this charge and is paying
amounts owed to employees for severance as income continuance.
During fiscal 2009, the Company recorded an additional charge of
$30.3 million related to this cost reduction action.
Approximately $2.1 million of this charge was for lease
obligation costs for facilities that the Company ceased using
during the first quarter of fiscal 2009; approximately
$0.9 million was for the write-off of property, plant and
equipment; and approximately $0.8 million was for contract
termination costs and for
clean-up and
closure costs that were expensed as incurred. The remaining
$26.5 million related to the severance and fringe benefit
costs recorded under the Companys ongoing benefit plan or
statutory requirements at foreign locations, for 245
manufacturing employees and 302 engineering and SMG&A
employees. As of October 31, 2009, the Company still
employed 16 of the 547 employees included in this cost
reduction action. These employees must continue to be employed
by the Company until their employment is involuntarily
terminated in order to receive the severance benefit.
72
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Closure
of Wafer Fabrication Facility in Cambridge
During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded a
special charge of $22.1 million as a result of its decision
to consolidate its Cambridge, Massachusetts wafer fabrication
facility into its existing Wilmington, Massachusetts facility.
In connection with the anticipated closure of this facility, the
Company evaluated the recoverability of the facilitys
manufacturing assets and concluded that there was an impairment
of approximately $12.9 million based on the revised period
of intended use. The remaining $9.2 million was for
severance and fringe benefit costs recorded under the
Companys ongoing benefit plan for 175 manufacturing
employees and 9 SMG&A employees associated with this action.
We finished production in the Cambridge fabrication facility and
began
clean-up
activities during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. During the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company reversed
approximately $1.8 million of its severance accrual. The
accrual reversal was required because 51 employees either
voluntarily left the Company or found alternative employment
within the Company. In addition, the Company recorded a special
charge of approximately $1.7 million for the impairment of
manufacturing assets that were originally going to be moved to
our other wafer fabrication facilities but are no longer needed
at those facilities and therefore have no future use. The
Company also recorded a special charge of $0.1 million for
clean-up
costs as the Company began its cleanup of the Cambridge
fabrication facility at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009. As of October 31, 2009, the Company still employed 33
of the employees included in this action. The remaining
employees will continue working during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 on the cleanup and closure of the wafer fabrication
facility. These employees must continue to be employed by the
Company until their employment is involuntarily terminated in
order to receive the severance benefit. The Company expects to
incur additional expenses, that cannot be precisely determined
at this time, related to this action in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 for lease termination, cleanup and closure costs.
The lease charge will be taken when the Company ceases using the
building and the cleanup and closure costs will be expensed as
incurred.
In fiscal 2006, the Company completed a transaction with TTPCom
Limited (TTPCom), whereby TTPCom transferred to the Company
intellectual property, engineering resources, and related assets
associated with the support and customization of TTPComs
GSM/GPRS/EDGE modem software for use on the Companys
existing and future generations of
SoftFone®
baseband processors. The Company also acquired development
rights for AJAR, TTPComs advanced applications platform.
As a result of this transaction, the Company became the single
point of contact for both hardware and software support for its
new and existing wireless handset customers, thus improving the
Companys abilities to service the needs of individual
customers. During fiscal 2007, the Company paid
$6.1 million of contingent consideration related to this
acquisition.
In fiscal 2006, the Company acquired substantially all the
outstanding stock of privately-held Integrant Technologies, Inc.
(Integrant) of Seoul, Korea. The acquisition enabled the Company
to enter the mobile TV market and strengthened its presence in
the Asian region. The Company paid $8.4 million related to
the purchase of shares from the founder of Integrant during the
period from July 2007 through July 2009. The Company recorded
these payments as additional goodwill.
In fiscal 2006, the Company acquired all the outstanding stock
of privately-held AudioAsics A/S (AudioAsics) of Roskilde,
Denmark. The acquisition of AudioAsics allows the Company to
continue developing low-power audio solutions, while expanding
its presence in the Nordic and Eastern European regions. The
Company paid additional cash payments of $3.1 million
during fiscal 2009 for the achievement of revenue-based
milestones during the period from October 2006 through January
2009, which were recorded as additional goodwill. In addition
the Company paid $3.2 million during fiscal 2009 based on
the achievement of technological milestones during the period
from October 2006 through January 2009, which were recorded as
compensation expense in fiscal 2008. All revenue and
technological milestones related to this acquisitions have been
met and no additional payments will be made.
73
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has not provided pro forma results of operations for
TTPCom, Integrant and AudioAsics herein as they were not
material to the Company on either an individual or an aggregate
basis. The Company included the results of operations of each
acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the
date of such acquisition.
|
|
7.
|
Deferred
Compensation Plan Investments
|
Investments in The Analog Devices, Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan (the Deferred Compensation Plan) are classified as trading.
The components of the investments as of October 31, 2009
and November 1, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Corporate obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,785
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
2,841
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
6,213
|
|
|
|
6,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred compensation plan investments short
and long term
|
|
$
|
7,943
|
|
|
$
|
32,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair values of these investments are based on published
market quotes on October 31, 2009 and November 1,
2008, respectively. Adjustments to fair value of, and income
pertaining to, Deferred Compensation Plan investments are
recorded in operating expenses. Gross realized and unrealized
gains and losses from trading securities were not material in
fiscal 2009, 2008 or 2007.
The Company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts
owed to the Deferred Compensation Plan participants (see
Note 10). These investments are specifically designated as
available to the Company solely for the purpose of paying
benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan. However, in the
event the Company became insolvent, the investments would be
available to all unsecured general creditors.
Other investments consist of equity securities and other
long-term investments. Investments are stated at fair value,
which is based on market quotes, or on a cost-basis, dependent
on the nature of the investment, as appropriate. Adjustments to
the fair value of investments classified as
available-for-sale
are recorded as an increase or decrease in accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income, unless the adjustment is considered
an
other-than-temporary
impairment, in which case the adjustment is recorded as a charge
in the statement of income.
There were no realized gains or losses recorded in fiscal 2009
or 2008. Realized gains of $7.9 million were recorded in
fiscal 2007 related to the sale of a cost-basis investment.
Unrealized gains and losses on securities classified as other
investments at of October 31, 2009 and November 1,
2008 were as follows :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
|
|
$
|
1,258
|
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
Unrealized losses
|
|
|
(718
|
)
|
|
|
(828
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities classified as other
investments
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities at October 31, 2009 and
November 1, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
58,272
|
|
|
$
|
91,997
|
|
Special charges
|
|
|
15,332
|
|
|
|
18,181
|
|
Other
|
|
|
48,589
|
|
|
|
81,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
122,193
|
|
|
$
|
191,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Deferred
Compensation Plan Liability
|
The deferred compensation plan liability relates to obligations
due under the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred
Compensation Plan allows certain members of management and other
highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer
receipt of all or any portion of their compensation. The balance
represents Deferred Compensation Plan participant accumulated
deferrals, and earnings thereon, since the inception of the
Deferred Compensation Plan, net of withdrawals. The
Companys liability under the Deferred Compensation Plan is
an unsecured general obligation of the Company.
The Company leases certain of its facilities, equipment and
software under various operating leases that expire at various
dates through 2025. The lease agreements frequently include
renewal and escalation clauses and require the Company to pay
taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Total rental expense
under operating leases was approximately $40 million in
fiscal 2009, $43 million in fiscal 2008 and
$43 million in fiscal 2007.
The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments
required under long-term operating leases at October 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Fiscal Years
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
24,735
|
|
2011
|
|
|
19,086
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8,819
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
Later Years
|
|
|
18,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
80,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
From time to time in the ordinary course of our business,
various claims, charges and litigation are asserted or commenced
against the Company arising from, or related to, contractual
matters, patents, trademarks, personal injury, environmental
matters, product liability, insurance coverage and personnel and
employment disputes. As to such claims and litigation, the
Company can give no assurance that it will prevail. The Company
does not believe that any current legal matters will have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
|
|
13.
|
Maxim
Litigation Settlement
|
The Company executed a legal settlement with Maxim Integrated
Products, Inc. (Maxim) during the second quarter of fiscal 2007,
which resulted in the Company receiving $19 million. The
Company recorded $8.5 million as
75
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
a credit to legal expense in selling, marketing, general and
administrative expense because this amount represents the fair
value of external legal costs incurred by the Company in this
matter. The remaining $10.5 million has been recorded in
other income because the amount was not related to the
reimbursement of external legal costs and management deems it to
be an isolated event. This amount is earned in full because the
Company has no future obligation to Maxim with respect to this
payment.
The Company and its subsidiaries have various savings and
retirement plans covering substantially all employees. The
Company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of
its eligible U.S. employees. This plan provides for Company
contributions of up to 5% of each participants total
eligible compensation. In addition, the Company contributes an
amount equal to each participants pre-tax contribution, if
any, up to a maximum of 3% of each participants total
eligible compensation. The total expense related to the defined
contribution plan for U.S. employees was $21.5 million
in fiscal 2009, $22.6 million in fiscal 2008 and
$20.8 million in fiscal 2007. The Company also has various
defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain
non-U.S. employees
that are consistent with local statutory requirements and
practices. The total expense related to the various defined
benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain
non-U.S. employees
was $10.9 million in fiscal 2009, $13.9 million in
fiscal 2008 and $17.3 million in fiscal 2007.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company began to
recognize the funded status of defined-benefit post retirement
plans on the Companys consolidated balance sheets and
changes in the funded status in comprehensive (loss) income.
During fiscal 2009 the measurement date of the plans
funded status was changed from September 30 to October 31,
2009, the same as the Companys fiscal year end.
Non-U.S.
Plan Disclosures
The Companys funding policy for its foreign defined
benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements
of each country. The plans assets consist primarily of
U.S. and
non-U.S. equity
securities, bonds, property and cash. The benefit obligations
and related assets under these plans have been measured at
October 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008.
Net annual periodic pension cost of
non-U.S. plans
is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6,368
|
|
|
$
|
9,580
|
|
|
$
|
10,890
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
9,525
|
|
|
|
10,234
|
|
|
|
8,862
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(10,703
|
)
|
|
|
(12,312
|
)
|
|
|
(9,584
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Amortization of transitional asset
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
4,636
|
|
|
$
|
7,655
|
|
|
$
|
10,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment impact
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Settlement impact
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
The special termination benefits presented relate to certain
early retirement benefits provided in certain jurisdictions.
76
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Obligation and asset data of the Companys
non-U.S. plans
at each fiscal year end is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
149,428
|
|
|
$
|
180,771
|
|
Adjustments due to change in defined benefit plans measurement
date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. Service cost and interest cost during gap period
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Additional experience during gap period
|
|
|
(10,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
c. Gap period benefit payments from plan, employee
contributions, expenses, taxes and premiums paid
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
6,368
|
|
|
|
9,580
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
9,525
|
|
|
|
10,234
|
|
Curtailment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
Settlement
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
(3,244
|
)
|
|
|
(28,117
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3,925
|
)
|
|
|
(3,642
|
)
|
Exchange rate adjustment
|
|
|
18,550
|
|
|
|
(21,844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
165,047
|
|
|
$
|
149,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
120,914
|
|
|
$
|
167,805
|
|
Adjustments due to change in defined benefit plans measurement
date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Additional experience during gap period
|
|
|
(9,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
c. Gap period benefit payments from plan, employee
contributions, expenses, taxes and premiums paid
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
8,839
|
|
|
|
(36,452
|
)
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
7,639
|
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions/divestitures
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums paid
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3,925
|
)
|
|
|
(3,642
|
)
|
Exchange rate adjustment
|
|
|
15,024
|
|
|
|
(17,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
135,643
|
|
|
$
|
120,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Funded Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$
|
(29,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28,514
|
)
|
Contribution between September 30 and fiscal year end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(29,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For years after the change in accounting principle related
to defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(832
|
)
|
|
$
|
(758
|
)
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(28,572
|
)
|
|
|
(27,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(29,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Amounts Recognized in the Statement of
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial net obligation
|
|
$
|
(93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(10,720
|
)
|
|
|
(10,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(10,814
|
)
|
|
|
(10,409
|
)
|
Accumulated contributions below net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
(18,590
|
)
|
|
|
(17,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$
|
(29,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income Changes Recognized in Other
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss arising during the year (includes curtailment gains not
recognized as a component of net periodic cost)
|
|
$
|
(1,380
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,313
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on amounts included in accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
(2,964
|
)
|
Amounts recognized as a component of net periodic benefit
cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, settlement or curtailment recognition of net
transition asset
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service cost
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Amortization or settlement recognition of net gain (loss)
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit and other comprehensive
loss (income)
|
|
$
|
4,934
|
|
|
$
|
24,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes recognized in balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet recognition of change in defined benefit plans
measurement date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization amounts during gap period
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Experience gain during gap period
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income over the next fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial net asset
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Net gain
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for
non-U.S. pension
plans was $127.3 million and $107.4 million at
October 31, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively.
The projected benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets
for
non-U.S. pension
plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets were $165.0 million and $135.6 million,
respectively, at October 31, 2009 and $149.4 million
and $120.9 million, respectively, at September 30,
2008.
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit
obligation, and fair value of plan assets for
non-U.S. pension
plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan
assets were $42.5 million, $38.7 million and
$19.4 million, respectively, at October 31, 2009, and
$37.1 million, $32.8 million and $16.6 million,
respectively, at September 30, 2008.
78
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The range of assumptions used for the
non-U.S. defined
benefit plans reflects the different economic environments
within the various countries. The projected benefit obligation
was determined using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.32
|
%
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
Net annual periodic pension cost was determined using the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
|
|
5.64
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.16
|
%
|
|
|
7.14
|
%
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
3.83
|
%
|
The expected long-term rate of return on assets is a weighted
average of the long-term rates of return selected for the
various countries where the Company has funded pension plans.
The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption is
selected based on the facts and circumstances that exist as of
the measurement date, and the specific portfolio mix of plan
assets. Management, in conjunction with its actuaries, reviewed
anticipated future long-term performance of individual asset
categories and considered the asset allocation strategy adopted
by the Company and or the trustees of the plans. While the
review considered recent fund performance and historical
returns, the assumption is primarily a long-term, prospective
rate.
Expected fiscal 2010 Company contributions and estimated future
benefit payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Company Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
30,050
|
|
Expected Benefit Payments
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
3,454
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,450
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
4,600
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
6,031
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
6,587
|
|
2015-2018
|
|
$
|
32,533
|
|
The Companys year-end pension plan weighted average asset
allocations by category were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Strategic Target
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
Bonds
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Cash
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Property
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Determination for adjustment due to change in defined benefit
plans measurement date
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
a. Service (cost)
|
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
b. Interest (cost)
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
c. Expected return on asset
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service (cost), interest (cost), and expected return on assets
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
d. Amortization of transition asset
|
|
|
2
|
|
e. Amortization of past service credit (cost)
|
|
|
|
|
f. Amortization of gain
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizations
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g. Total adjustment to retained earnings
|
|
$
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
a. Total amortizations
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
b. Additional experience gain (loss) during gap period
|
|
|
|
|
Liability gain during gap period
|
|
|
10,099
|
|
Asset loss during gap period
|
|
|
(10,673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total experience loss during gap period
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
c. Total adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fundamental goal underlying the pension plans
investment policy is to achieve a total rate of return that
exceeds inflation over the long-term by using a certain mix of
assets depending on the profile of the specific plan. Investment
practices must comply with applicable laws and regulations.
The Companys investment strategy is based on an
expectation that equity securities will outperform debt
securities over the long term. Accordingly, in order to maximize
the return on assets, a majority of assets are invested in
equities. Investments within each asset class are diversified to
reduce the impact of losses in single investments. The use of
derivative instruments is permitted where appropriate and
necessary to achieve overall investment policy objectives and
asset class targets.
The Company establishes strategic asset allocation percentage
targets and appropriate benchmarks for each significant asset
class to obtain a prudent balance between return and risk. The
interaction between plan assets and benefit obligations is
periodically studied by the Company and its actuaries to assist
in the establishment of strategic asset allocation targets.
80
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The reconciliation of income tax computed at the
U.S. federal statutory rates to income tax expense is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
U.S. federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Income tax provision reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax at statutory rate:
|
|
$
|
104,105
|
|
|
$
|
233,136
|
|
|
$
|
231,510
|
|
Irish income subject to lower tax rate
|
|
|
(50,972
|
)
|
|
|
(92,732
|
)
|
|
|
(65,673
|
)
|
Domestic and international tax examination charges including
penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
1,744
|
|
Research and development tax credits
|
|
|
(5,153
|
)
|
|
|
(3,401
|
)
|
|
|
(14,667
|
)
|
Net foreign tax in excess of U.S. federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision
|
|
$
|
50,036
|
|
|
$
|
140,925
|
|
|
$
|
159,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For financial reporting purposes, income before income taxes
includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Pretax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
1,133
|
|
|
$
|
186,130
|
|
|
$
|
282,410
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
296,311
|
|
|
|
479,972
|
|
|
|
379,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before income taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
297,444
|
|
|
$
|
666,102
|
|
|
$
|
661,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal (benefit) tax
|
|
$
|
(5,191
|
)
|
|
$
|
79,642
|
|
|
$
|
101,183
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
43,007
|
|
|
|
70,882
|
|
|
|
58,785
|
|
State
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
1,770
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
$
|
38,441
|
|
|
$
|
152,294
|
|
|
$
|
162,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred (prepaid):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
17,033
|
|
|
$
|
(7,268
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,336
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(5,438
|
)
|
|
|
(4,101
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
$
|
11,595
|
|
|
$
|
(11,369
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company continues to intend to reinvest certain of its
foreign earnings indefinitely. Accordingly, no U.S. income
taxes have been provided for approximately $1,851 million
of unremitted earnings of international subsidiaries. As of
October 31, 2009, the amount of unrecognized deferred tax
liability on these earnings was $480 million.
81
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The significant components of the Companys deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the fiscal years ended
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory reserves
|
|
$
|
30,365
|
|
|
$
|
33,058
|
|
Deferred income on shipments to distributors
|
|
|
25,775
|
|
|
|
24,913
|
|
Reserves for compensation and benefits
|
|
|
25,182
|
|
|
|
29,287
|
|
Tax credit carryovers
|
|
|
52,443
|
|
|
|
48,073
|
|
Mark-to-market
adjustment
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
4,657
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
62,496
|
|
|
|
73,619
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
4,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,702
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
204,002
|
|
|
|
216,698
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(51,616
|
)
|
|
|
(48,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
152,386
|
|
|
|
168,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(13,498
|
)
|
|
|
673
|
|
Acquisition Accounting
|
|
|
(2,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,318
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
(18,853
|
)
|
|
|
(9,484
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,655
|
)
|
|
|
(1,181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(36,232
|
)
|
|
|
(14,310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
116,154
|
|
|
$
|
154,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowances of $51.6 million and
$48.1 million at October 31, 2009 and November 1,
2008, respectively, are a full valuation allowance for the
Companys state credit carryovers that began expiring in
2008.
The Company has provided for potential liabilities due in the
various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Judgment is
required in determining the worldwide income tax expense
provision. In the ordinary course of global business, there are
many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
outcome is uncertain. Some of these uncertainties arise as a
consequence of cost reimbursement arrangements among related
entities. Although the Company believes its estimates are
reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome
of these matters will not be different than that which is
reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals.
Such differences could have a material impact on the
Companys income tax provision and operating results in the
period in which such determination is made.
On November 4, 2007 (the first day of its 2008 fiscal
year), the Company adopted new accounting principles on
accounting for uncertain tax positions. These principles require
companies to determine whether it is more likely than
not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination
by the appropriate taxing authorities before any benefit can be
recorded in the financial statements. An uncertain income tax
position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50%
likelihood of being sustained. There were no changes to the
Companys liabilities for uncertain tax positions as a
result of the adoption these provisions. As of October 31,
2009 and November 1, 2008, the Company had a liability of
$18.2 million and $13.8 million, respectively, for
gross unrealized tax benefits, all of which, if settled in the
Companys favor, would lower the Companys effective
tax rate in the period recorded. In addition, as of
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008, the Company had
a liability of approximately $8.0 million and
$6.4 million respectively, for interest and penalties. The
total liability as of October 31, 2009 and November 1,
2008 of $26.2 million and $20.2 million, respectively,
for uncertain tax positions is classified as non-current, and
82
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
included in other non-current liabilities, because the Company
believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these
liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months. Prior
to the adoption of these provisions, these amounts were included
in current income tax payable. The Company includes interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the
provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of
income, and as a result, no change in classification was made
upon adopting these provisions. The condensed consolidated
statements of income for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008
include $1.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively,
of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax
positions. Due to the complexity associated with its tax
uncertainties, the Company cannot make a reasonably reliable
estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the
liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions.
The following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts
of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 3, 2007
|
|
$
|
9,889
|
|
Additions for tax positions of current year
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 1, 2008
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
Additions for tax positions of current year
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
18,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year 2004 and 2005 IRS Examination
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the IRS completed its
field examination of the Companys fiscal years 2004 and
2005. On January 2, 2008, the IRS issued its report for
fiscal 2004 and 2005, which included proposed adjustments
related to these two fiscal years. The Company has recorded
taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed
adjustments. There are four items with an additional potential
total tax liability of $46 million. The Company has
concluded, based on discussions with its tax advisors, that
these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax
liability. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any
additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these
proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the
resolution of differences between the IRS and taxpayers. The
Companys initial meetings with the appellate division of
the IRS were held during fiscal year 2009. Two of the unresolved
matters are one-time issues and pertain to Section 965 of
the Internal Revenue Code related to the beneficial tax
treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under The
American Jobs Creation Act. The other matters pertain to the
computation of research and development (R&D) tax credits
and the profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on
outside the United States. These latter two matters could impact
taxes payable for fiscal 2004 and 2005 as well as for subsequent
years.
Fiscal
Year 2006 and 2007 IRS Examination
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the IRS completed its
field examination of the Companys fiscal years 2006 and
2007. The IRS and the Company have agreed on the treatment of a
number of issues that have been included in an Issue Resolutions
Agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns. However, no
agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of
issues, including the same R&D credit and foreign
manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and
2005, the pricing of intercompany sales (transfer pricing), and
the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the IRS issued its
report for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, which included proposed
adjustments related to these two fiscal years. The Company has
recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these
proposed adjustments. There are four items with an additional
potential total tax liability of $195 million. The Company
concluded, based on discussions with its tax advisors, that
these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax
liability. Therefore, the Company has not recorded any
additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these
proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the
resolution of differences between the IRS and taxpayers. With
the exception of the
83
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
proposed adjustment related to the deductibility of certain
stock option expenses, the other three matters could impact
taxes payable for fiscal 2006 and 2007 as well as for subsequent
years.
Fiscal
Year 2008 and 2009 IRS Examination
The IRS has not started their examination of fiscal year 2008 or
fiscal year 2009.
Although the Company believes its estimates of income tax
payable are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the
Company will prevail in the matters raised and that the outcome
of one or all of these matters will not be different than that
which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and
accruals. The Company believes such differences would not have a
material impact on the Companys financial condition but
could have a material impact on the Companys income tax
provision, operating results and operating cash flows in the
period in which such matters are resolved.
|
|
16.
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
As of October 31, 2009, the Company had $1,816 million
of cash and cash equivalents and short term investments, of
which $412.7 million was held in the United States. The
balance of the Companys cash and cash equivalents and
short term investments was held outside the United States in
various foreign subsidiaries. As the Company intends to reinvest
certain of its foreign earnings indefinitely, this cash is not
available to meet certain of the Companys cash
requirements in the United States, including for cash dividends
and common stock repurchases. If the Company is unable to
address its U.S. cash requirements through operations, by
efficient and timely repatriations of overseas cash, through
borrowings under its current credit facility or from other
sources of cash obtained at an acceptable cost, its business
strategies and operating results could be adversely affected.
The Company entered into a five-year, $165 million
unsecured revolving credit facility with certain institutional
lenders in May 2008. To date, the Company has not borrowed under
this credit facility but the Company may borrow in the future
and use the proceeds for support of commercial paper issuance,
stock repurchases, dividend payments, acquisitions, capital
expenditures, working capital and other lawful corporate
purposes. Any advances under this credit agreement will accrue
interest at rates that are equal to LIBOR plus a margin that is
based on the Companys leverage ratio. The terms of this
facility also include financial covenants that require the
Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and not
exceed a maximum leverage ratio. The Company is currently
compliant with these covenants. The terms of the facility also
impose restrictions on the Companys ability to undertake
certain transactions, to create certain liens on assets and to
incur certain subsidiary indebtedness.
On June 30, 2009, the Company issued $375 million
aggregate principal amount of 5.0% senior unsecured notes
due July 1, 2014 (the Notes) with semi-annual fixed
interest payments on January 1 and July 1 of each year,
commencing January 1, 2010. The sale of the Notes was made
pursuant to the terms of an underwriting agreement dated
June 25, 2009 between the Company and Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, as representative of the several
underwriters named therein. The net proceeds of the offering
were $370.4 million, after issuing at a discount and
deducting expenses, underwriting discounts and commissions,
which will be amortized over the term of the Notes. The
indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that may limit
the Companys ability to: incur, create, assume or
guarantee any debt for borrowed money secured by a lien upon a
principal property; enter into sale and lease-back transactions
with respect to a principal property; and consolidate with or
merge into, or transfer or lease all or substantially all of its
assets to, any other party.
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate
swap transactions where the Company swapped the notional amount
of its $375 million of fixed rate debt at 5.0% into
floating interest rate debt through July 1, 2014. Under the
terms of the swaps, the Company will (i) receive on the
$375 million notional amount a 5.0% annual interest payment
that is paid in two installments on the 1st of every January and
July, commencing January 1, 2010 through and ending on the
maturity date; and (ii) pay on the $375 million
notional amount an annual three-month
84
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
LIBOR plus 2.05% (2.34% as of October 31,
2009) interest payment, payable in four installments on the
1st of every January, April, July and October, commencing on
October 1, 2009 and ending on the maturity date. The LIBOR
based rate is set quarterly three months prior to the date of
the interest payment. The Company designated these swaps as fair
value hedges. The changes in the fair value of the interest rate
swaps were reflected in the carrying value of the interest rate
swaps in other assets on the balance sheet. The carrying value
of the debt on the balance sheet was adjusted by an equal and
offsetting amount.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the issuance
of these financial statements which occurred on
November 24, 2009. On November 19, 2009, the Board of
Directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.20 per
outstanding share of common stock. The dividend will be paid on
December 23, 2009 to all shareholders of record at the
close of business on December 4, 2009.
85
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Analog Devices, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Analog Devices, Inc. as of October 31, 2009 and
November 1, 2008, and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders equity, comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
October 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(c). These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Analog Devices, Inc. at October 31,
2009 and November 1, 2008, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended October 31, 2009, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective November 3, 2007, the Company adopted
the guidance originally issued in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(codified primarily in FASB ASC Topic
715-20,
Defined Benefit Plans-General). Additionally, as
discussed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective November 4, 2007, the Company adopted
the guidance originally issued in Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (codified primarily in FASB ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Analog Devices, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of October 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated November 24, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Boston, Massachusetts
November 24, 2009
86
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
SUPPLEMENTARY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
Quarterly financial information for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008
(thousands, except per share amounts and as noted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4Q09
|
|
|
3Q09
|
|
|
2Q09
|
|
|
1Q09
|
|
|
4Q08
|
|
|
3Q08
|
|
|
2Q08
|
|
|
1Q08
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
571,600
|
|
|
|
491,991
|
|
|
|
474,748
|
|
|
|
476,569
|
|
|
|
660,696
|
|
|
|
658,986
|
|
|
|
649,340
|
|
|
|
613,909
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
249,746
|
|
|
|
225,762
|
|
|
|
213,196
|
|
|
|
207,567
|
|
|
|
257,039
|
|
|
|
257,192
|
|
|
|
253,319
|
|
|
|
238,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
321,854
|
|
|
|
266,229
|
|
|
|
261,552
|
|
|
|
269,002
|
|
|
|
403,657
|
|
|
|
401,794
|
|
|
|
396,021
|
|
|
|
375,803
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
56.3
|
%
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
|
|
55.1
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
61.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
110,126
|
|
|
|
107,578
|
|
|
|
109,448
|
|
|
|
119,828
|
|
|
|
133,451
|
|
|
|
135,837
|
|
|
|
134,653
|
|
|
|
129,539
|
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
83,356
|
|
|
|
79,706
|
|
|
|
82,276
|
|
|
|
87,846
|
|
|
|
106,381
|
|
|
|
104,767
|
|
|
|
104,183
|
|
|
|
100,351
|
|
Special charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,919
|
|
|
|
41,737
|
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
193,482
|
|
|
|
187,284
|
|
|
|
203,643
|
|
|
|
249,411
|
|
|
|
242,920
|
|
|
|
240,604
|
|
|
|
238,836
|
|
|
|
229,890
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations
|
|
|
128,372
|
|
|
|
78,945
|
|
|
|
57,909
|
|
|
|
19,591
|
|
|
|
160,737
|
|
|
|
161,190
|
|
|
|
157,185
|
|
|
|
145,913
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Nonoperating (income) expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(1,740
|
)
|
|
|
(2,558
|
)
|
|
|
(3,527
|
)
|
|
|
(7,796
|
)
|
|
|
(9,641
|
)
|
|
|
(8,205
|
)
|
|
|
(10,669
|
)
|
|
|
(12,526
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonoperating (income) expense
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
|
|
(4,324
|
)
|
|
|
(8,367
|
)
|
|
|
(10,628
|
)
|
|
|
(7,541
|
)
|
|
|
(10,555
|
)
|
|
|
(12,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
|
|
127,226
|
|
|
|
80,027
|
|
|
|
62,233
|
|
|
|
27,958
|
|
|
|
171,365
|
|
|
|
168,731
|
|
|
|
167,740
|
|
|
|
158,266
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
21,617
|
|
|
|
14,567
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
|
|
3,373
|
|
|
|
27,123
|
|
|
|
39,536
|
|
|
|
37,848
|
|
|
|
36,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
105,609
|
|
|
|
65,460
|
|
|
|
51,754
|
|
|
|
24,585
|
|
|
|
144,242
|
|
|
|
129,195
|
|
|
|
129,892
|
|
|
|
121,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
(Loss) gain on Sale of Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,457
|
)
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
105,609
|
|
|
|
65,460
|
|
|
|
51,754
|
|
|
|
24,949
|
|
|
|
143,871
|
|
|
|
138,608
|
|
|
|
133,086
|
|
|
|
370,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
Shares used to compute earnings per share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
291,739
|
|
|
|
291,387
|
|
|
|
291,227
|
|
|
|
291,187
|
|
|
|
290,847
|
|
|
|
290,376
|
|
|
|
290,389
|
|
|
|
299,141
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
294,016
|
|
|
|
293,084
|
|
|
|
292,446
|
|
|
|
291,248
|
|
|
|
293,820
|
|
|
|
295,001
|
|
|
|
295,360
|
|
|
|
304,260
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our management, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Analogs disclosure
controls and procedures as of October 31, 2009. The term
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures
of a company that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving
their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment
in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of October 31, 2009, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as
of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers and effected by the companys board of directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2009. In
making this assessment, the companys management used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework.
Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of
October 31, 2009, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an
attestation report on our internal control over financial
reporting. This report appears below.
(c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public
Accounting Firm
88
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Analog Devices, Inc.
We have audited Analog Devices, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of October 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Analog Devices,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
managements report on internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Analog Devices, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of October 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Analog Devices, Inc. as of
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity,
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended October 31, 2009 of Analog Devices,
Inc. and our report dated November 24, 2009 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Boston, Massachusetts
November 24, 2009
89
(d) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. No change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal
quarter ended October 31, 2009 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Not applicable.
90
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information required by this item relating to our directors and
nominees is contained in our 2010 proxy statement under the
caption Proposal 1 Election of
Directors and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this item relating to our executive
officers is contained under the caption EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
OF THE COMPANY in Part I of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and is incorporated herein by reference. Information required by
this item relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is contained in our 2010 proxy
statement under the caption Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance and is incorporated herein
by reference.
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics
that applies to our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,
or persons performing similar functions and have posted it in
the Corporate Governance section of our website which is located
at www.analog.com. We intend to satisfy any disclosure
requirement under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding any amendments to, or waivers from, our code of
business conduct and ethics by posting such information on our
website which is located at www.analog.com.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we made no material
change to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend
nominees to our Board of Directors, as described in our 2009
proxy statement.
Information required by this item relating to the audit
committee of our Board of Directors is contained in our 2010
proxy statement under the caption Corporate
Governance Board of Directors Meetings and
Committees Audit Committee and is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information required by this item is contained in our 2010 proxy
statement under the captions Corporate
Governance Director Compensation and
Information About Executive Compensation and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information required by this item relating to security ownership
of certain beneficial owners and management is contained in our
2010 proxy statement under the caption Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and is
incorporated herein by reference. Information required by this
item relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity
compensation plans is contained in our 2010 proxy statement
under the caption Information About Executive
Compensation Securities Authorized for Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans and is incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information required by this item relating to transactions with
related persons is contained in our 2010 proxy statement under
the caption Corporate Governance Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and is incorporated
herein by reference. Information required by this item relating
to director independence is contained in our 2010 proxy
statement under the caption Corporate
Governance Determination of Independence and
is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information required by this item is contained in our 2010 proxy
statement under the caption Corporate
Governance Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm Fees and Other Matters and is incorporated herein by
reference.
91
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) The following are filed as part of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K:
The following consolidated financial statements are included in
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2009 and
November 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
years ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years
ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
|
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately
preceding the exhibits are filed with or incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
(c)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
The following consolidated financial statement schedule is
included in Item 15(c) of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted since the required
information is not present, or not present in amounts sufficient
to require submission of the schedule or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the Notes thereto.
92
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009
ITEM 15(c)
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
93
Schedule Of Valuation And Qualifying Accounts Disclosure
ANALOG
DEVICES, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years
ended October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008 and
November 3, 2007
(Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Income Statement
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable Reserves and Allowances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended November 3, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
$
|
4,753
|
|
|
$
|
3,675
|
|
|
$
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended November 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,611
|
|
|
$
|
8,427
|
|
|
$
|
6,537
|
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended October 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
|
$
|
3,628
|
|
|
$
|
7,448
|
|
|
$
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ JERALD
G. FISHMAN
|
Jerald G. Fishman
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 24, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ray
Stata
Ray
Stata
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerald
G. Fishman
Jerald
G. Fishman
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
A. Zinsner
David
A. Zinsner
|
|
Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Seamus
Brennan
Seamus
Brennan
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
A. Champy
James
A. Champy
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
L. Doyle
John
L. Doyle
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
C. Hodgson
John
C. Hodgson
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Yves-Andre
Istel
Yves-Andre
Istel
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Neil
Novich
Neil
Novich
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ F.
Grant Saviers
F.
Grant Saviers
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul
J. Severino
Paul
J. Severino
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenton
J. Sicchitano
Kenton
J. Sicchitano
|
|
Director
|
|
November 24, 2009
|
96
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated June 25, 2009, between Analog
Devices, Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as
representative of the several underwriters named therein, filed
as exhibit 1.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
(File No. 1-7819), filed with the Commission on June 30, 2009
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2007,
among Analog Devices, Inc., various subsidiaries, and MediaTek
Inc., filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 3, 2007 (File No.
1-7819) as filed with the Commission on November 30, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated January
11, 2008, among Analog Devices, Inc., various subsidiaries, and
MediaTek Inc. filed as an exhibit to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819), as filed with the
Commission on January 16, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
2
|
.3
|
|
License Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2008, among Analog
Devices, Inc., Analog Devices B.V., MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek
Singapore Pte. Ltd., filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819), as filed with the
Commission on January 16, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Organization of Analog Devices, Inc., as
amended, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 3, 2008
(File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on May 20, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amendment to Restated Articles of Organization of Analog
Devices, Inc., filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December
8, 2008 (File
No. 1-7819)
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Analog Devices, Inc., filed as
exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on December 3, 2008 (File No. 1-7819)
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Indenture, by and between Analog Devices, Inc. and The Bank of
New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as Trustee) dated as of
June 30, 2009, filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
August 1, 2009 (File No. 1-7819) and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated June 30, 2009, between Analog
Devices, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A., as trustee, filed as exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819), filed with the
Commission on June 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of 5.00% Global Note due July 1, 2014, filed as exhibit 4.2
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
1-7819), filed with the Commission on June 30, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference
|
|
*10
|
.1
|
|
Analog Devices, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation
Plan, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended January 28, 2006 (File No.
1-7819) as filed with the Commission on February 15, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Analog Devices, Inc. Amended and Restated
Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 3, 2007 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on November 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
*10
|
.3
|
|
Analog Devices, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation
Plan, incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on December 8, 2008 (File No. 1-7819) and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.4
|
|
Trust Agreement for Deferred Compensation Plan dated as of
October 1, 2003 between Analog Devices, Inc. and Fidelity
Management Trust Company, filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on December 23, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
*10
|
.5
|
|
First Amendment to Trust Agreement for Deferred Compensation
Plan between Analog Devices, Inc. and Fidelity Management Trust
Company dated as of January 1, 2005, filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 28, 2006 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on November 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
*10
|
.6
|
|
Second Amendment to Trust Agreement for Deferred Compensation
Plan between Analog Devices, Inc. and Fidelity Management Trust
Company dated as of December 10, 2007, filed as exhibit 10.41 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended November 1, 2008 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on November 25, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
*10
|
.7
|
|
Restated 1988 Stock Option Plan of Analog Devices, Inc., filed
as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 3, 1997 (File No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on June 17, 1997 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.8
|
|
Restated 1994 Director Option Plan of Analog Devices, Inc.,
as amended, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 2, 2002
(File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on January 29, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.9
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan of Analog Devices Inc., as amended, filed
as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended November 2, 2002 (File No. 1-7819) as
filed with the Commission on January 29, 2003 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Analog Devices, Inc. 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan, as
amended, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 2, 2002 (File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on January 29, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.11
|
|
2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Analog Devices, Inc., filed as
Appendix A of the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A filed with the Commission on February 8, 2006 (File
No. 1-7819) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.12
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Analog Devices,
Inc., filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 28, 2006 (File No.
1-7819) as filed with the Commission on November 20, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.13
|
|
Second Amendment to 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Analog Devices,
Inc., filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2009 (File
No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on August 18, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.14
|
|
Third Amendment to 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of Analog Devices,
Inc.
|
|
*10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Confirming Memorandum for Grants of Non-Qualified Stock
Options to Employees for usage under the Companys 2006
Stock Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819), as filed with the
Commission on December 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
*10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Confirming Memorandum for Grants of Non-Qualified Stock
Options to Directors for usage under the Companys 2006
Stock Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
August 4, 2007 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on
August 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for usage under the
Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819),
as filed with the Commission on September 25, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Confirming Memorandum for usage
under the Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, filed as an
exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File
No. 1-7819), as filed with the Commission on September 25, 2006
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.19
|
|
Analog Devices BV (Ireland) Employee Stock Option Program, as
amended, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 2, 2002 (File
No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on January 29, 2003 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
BCO Technologies Plc Unapproved Share Option Scheme, filed as an
exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 333-50092) as filed with the Commission on November
16, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
BCO Technologies Plc Approved Share Option Scheme, filed as an
exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 333-50092) as filed with the Commission on November
16, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
ChipLogic, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan, filed as
an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-53314) as filed with the Commission on January
5, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Staccato Systems, Inc. 1998 Stock Plan, filed as an exhibit to
the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-53828) as filed with the Commission on January 17, 2001 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Various individual stock restriction and similar agreements
between the registrant and employees thereof relating to
ChipLogic, Inc., filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-57444) as filed
with the Commission on March 22, 2001, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 filed as an exhibit to the Companys Post-Effective
Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-57444) as filed with the Commission on March 23, 2001 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.25
|
|
Employment Agreement dated November 14, 2005 between Jerald G.
Fishman and Analog Devices, Inc., filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on November 15, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.26
|
|
Amendment dated as of October 22, 2007 to the Employment
Agreement dated as of November 14, 2005 between Jerald G.
Fishman and Analog Devices, Inc., filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819) as
filed with the Commission on October 26, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.27
|
|
Executive Retention Agreement dated October 22, 2007 between
Jerald G. Fishman and Analog Devices, Inc., filed as an exhibit
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on October 26, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.28
|
|
Letter Agreement between Analog Devices Inc. and Jerald G.
Fishman dated June 21, 2000 relating to acceleration of stock
options upon the occurrence of certain events, filed as an
exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 28, 2000 (File No. 1-7819) as filed
with the Commission on January 26, 2001 and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.29
|
|
Amendment dated as of October 22, 2007 to the Employee Retention
Agreement dated as of January 16, 1989 between Jerald G. Fishman
and Analog Devices, Inc., filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-7819) as
filed with the Commission on October 26, 2007 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.30
|
|
Description of 2009 Executive Bonus Plan.
|
|
*10
|
.31
|
|
Form of Employee Retention Agreement, as amended and restated,
filed as exhibit 10.27 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2008 (File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on November 25, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Form of Amendment to Employee Retention Agreement, incorporated
herein by reference to exhibit 10.3 of the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 8, 2008 (File No. 1-7819).
|
|
*10
|
.33
|
|
Employee Change in Control Severance Policy of Analog Devices,
Inc., as amended, filed as an exhibit to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30,
1999 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on January
28, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
*10
|
.34
|
|
Senior Management Change in Control Severance Policy of Analog
Devices, Inc., as amended, filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 30, 1999 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on January 28, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
*10
|
.35
|
|
Offer Letter for David A. Zinsner, dated November 18, 2008,
filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 (File
No. 1-7819)
as filed with the Commission on February 18, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
*10
|
.36
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers,
filed as exhibit 10.30 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2008 (File
No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on November 25,
2008 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated May 1, 1992 between
Analog Devices, Inc. and the trustees of Everett Street Trust
relating to the premises at 3 Technology Way, Norwood,
Massachusetts, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 1997
(File No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on January 28,
1998 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Guaranty dated as of May 1, 1994 between Analog Devices, Inc.
and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company relating to the premises
at 3 Technology Way, Norwood, Massachusetts, filed as an exhibit
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 30, 1999 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on January 28, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Letter Agreement dated as of May 18, 1994 between Analog
Devices, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company relating
to the premises at 3 Technology Way, Norwood, Massachusetts,
filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended October 30, 1999 (File No.
1-7819) as filed with the Commission on January 28, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Reimbursement Agreement dated May 18, 1992 between Analog
Devices, Inc. and the trustees of Everett Street Trust, filed as
an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended November 1, 1997 (File No. 1-7819) as
filed with the Commission on January 28, 1998 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Lease Agreement dated February 8, 1996 between Analog Devices,
Inc. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, relating to
premises located at 21 Osborn Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended November 3, 2001 (File No.
1-7819) as filed with the Commission on January 28, 2002 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
First Amendment dated December 13, 1996 to Lease Agreement dated
February 8, 1996 between Analog Devices, Inc. and Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, relating to premises located at 21
Osborn Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, filed as an exhibit to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 28, 2006 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on November 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Second Amendment dated December 20, 1996 to Lease Agreement
dated February 8, 1996 between Analog Devices, Inc. and
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, relating to premises
located at 21 Osborn Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, filed as
an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended October 28, 2006 (File No. 1-7819) as
filed with the Commission on November 20, 2006 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Third Amendment dated May 27, 1997 to Lease Agreement dated
February 8, 1996 between Analog Devices, Inc. and Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, relating to premises located at 21
Osborn Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, filed as an exhibit to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended October 28, 2006 (File No. 1-7819) as filed with the
Commission on November 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
Lease Agreement dated November 14, 1997, as amended, between
Analog Devices, Inc. and Liberty Property Limited Partnership,
relating to premises located at 7736 McCloud Road, Greensboro,
North Carolina, filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 28, 2006
(File No. 1-7819) as filed with the Commission on November 20,
2006 and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
Fifth Amendment dated September 14, 2007 to Lease Agreement
dated November 14, 1997, as amended, between Analog Devices,
Inc. and Crown-Greensboro I, LLC (as successor to Liberty
Property Limited Partnership), relating to premises located at
7736 McCloud Road, Greensboro, North Carolina, filed as an
exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended November 3, 2007 (File No. 1-7819) as filed
with the Commission on November 30, 2007 and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the
Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the
Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief
Executive Officer).
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Chief
Financial Officer).
|
|
101
|
. INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101
|
. SCH
|
|
XBRL Schema Document.
|
|
101
|
. CAL
|
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
. LAB
|
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
. PRE
|
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
. DEF
|
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
* |
|
Management contracts and compensatory plan or arrangements
required to be filed as an Exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b)
of
Form 10-K. |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
(i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008, and
November 3, 2007, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at
October 31, 2009 and November 1, 2008,
(iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
for the years ended October 31, 2009, November 1,
2008, and November 3, 2007, (iv) Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended
October 31, 2009, November 1, 2008, and
November 3, 2007, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the years ended October 31, 2009,
November 1, 2008, and November 3, 2007 and
(vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In accordance with Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act, is deemed not filed for purposes of
section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not
subject to liability under these sections.
exv10w14
Exhibit 10.14
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
Third Amendment to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) of Analog Devices, Inc. (the Corporation),
pursuant to Section 13(d) thereof, is hereby amended as set forth below:
|
|
|
VOTED: |
|
That the Corporation hereby adopts and approves a sub-plan (the French Sub-Plan)
to the 2006 Plan in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (such amendment
referred to as Appendix B France), in order to establish and implement a French qualified
stock option plan that satisfies the requirements of Sections L. 225-177 to L. 225-186 of the
French Commercial Code; and further that the Chairman of the Board, the President and Chief
Executive Officer, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and the Treasurer of
the Corporation, each of them acting singly, are hereby authorized and empowered to execute
any document necessary or proper to give effect to Appendix B France under the laws and
regulations of the country of France; and further, the aforementioned officers be, and
each acting singly hereby is, authorized in the name and on behalf of the Corporation to sign,
acknowledge, swear to and deliver any affidavit, agreement or other documents, each in such
form as the authorized person or persons executing the same shall determine to be in the best
interest of the Corporation to give proper effect to such Appendix B France, the execution
of any such documents to be sufficient evidence of such determination; and that the Secretary
of the Corporation be authorized to attest, co-sign and affix the Corporate seal to such
documents. |
Except to the extent amended hereby, all of the terms, provisions and conditions set forth in
the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. The Plan and
this amendment shall be read and construed together as a single instrument.
Approved by the Board of Directors on September 15, 2009
exv10w30
Exhibit 10.30
Analog Devices, Inc. 2009 Executive Bonus Plan
All executive officers and other senior management selected by the Chief Executive
Officer will participate in the Executive Bonus Plan. Bonus payments under the Executive Bonus Plan
are calculated and paid as follows:
1. Each participants Fiscal 2009 Bonus Target is obtained by multiplying his or her
Base Salary by his or her Individual Target Bonus Percentage:
|
|
|
Base Salary the individuals base pay during the applicable bonus period. |
|
|
|
|
Individual Target Bonus Percentage a percentage of the individuals Base Salary,
determined individually for each participant by the Compensation Committee and ranging from 50% to
160%. |
2. Each participants Fiscal 2009 Bonus Target is then multiplied by the Bonus
Payout Factor. The Bonus Payout Factor is based on the Companys operating profit before tax
(OPBT) as a percentage of revenue for the applicable bonus period, which is adjustable by the
Compensation Committee in its sole discretion to exclude special items, including but not limited
to: restructuring-related expense, acquisition-related expense, gain or loss on disposition of
businesses, non-recurring royalty payments, and other similar non-cash or non-recurring items. The
Bonus Payout Factor can range from 0% to 300%.
The Compensation Committee adopted the following Bonus Payout Factor table under the
Executive Bonus Plan:
|
|
|
Company Performance |
|
|
(OPBT/Revenue) |
|
Bonus Payout Factor |
12%
|
|
0% |
22.5%
|
|
100% |
31%
|
|
200% |
36%
|
|
300% |
The Bonus Payout Factor is determined quarterly and is also used to determine the
bonuses paid to all other employees of the Company under the Companys 2009 Profit Sharing Plan for
Employees.
The product obtained by multiplying a participants Fiscal 2009 Bonus Target by the
Bonus Payout Factor shall be the Fiscal 2009 Bonus Payment for each participant. Each participants
Fiscal 2009 Bonus Payment can therefore be reduced to zero, or increased by up to three times his
or her Fiscal 2009 Bonus Target.
3. Each participant in the Executive Bonus Plan, other than Ray Stata and Jerald
Fishman, is eligible for an additional Individual Payout Factor that can increase the calculated
bonus payment by up to 30% based on superior business performance. Evidence of superior business
performance will include, but is not limited to, overachievement of revenue and profitability
goals, and achievement of non-financial results that contributed positively to the performance of
the Company. At the end of fiscal year 2009, the Chief Executive Officer will review and assess the
performance of each of the eligible participants with respect to his or her goals, and will provide
his recommendations regarding each participants performance to the Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee will then, in its discretion, determine whether there is superior
performance justifying the application of an Individual Payout Factor.
4. Fiscal 2009 Bonus Payments, if any, under the Executive Bonus Plan will be calculated at
the end of each fiscal quarter and distributed after the first half and second half of fiscal year
2009. In the event that the Compensation Committee determines that a participant should receive an
Individual Payout Factor, such amount would be distributed to the participant after the end of the
fiscal year. Therefore, the distribution paid after the first half of fiscal year 2009 will be
based only on paragraphs 1 and 2 above, while the distribution paid after the fiscal year end will
be based on paragraphs 1 and 2 above and will also include any amount based on the application of
the Individual Payout Factor as described in paragraph 3 above.
exv12w1
Exhibit 12.1
Analog Devices, Inc.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
|
|
October 30, |
|
|
October 29, |
|
|
October 28, |
|
|
November 3, |
|
|
November 1, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
(In thousands, except ratios) |
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
provision for taxes on income |
|
$ |
633,707 |
|
|
$ |
537,201 |
|
|
$ |
636,792 |
|
|
$ |
661,457 |
|
|
$ |
666,102 |
|
|
$ |
297,444 |
|
Amortization of Capitalized interest |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
Fixed charges |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings as defined |
|
|
636,414 |
|
|
|
539,725 |
|
|
|
639,867 |
|
|
|
664,273 |
|
|
|
668,691 |
|
|
|
303,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and amortization expense |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
Interest portion of rent expense |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges |
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
$ |
1,542 |
|
|
$ |
2,093 |
|
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
$ |
5,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
368.9 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
305.7 |
|
|
|
362.2 |
|
|
|
416.1 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exv21
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
As of October 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
State or Other |
|
|
Jurisdiction of |
|
|
Incorporation or |
Name of Subsidiary |
|
Organization |
Analog Devices Limited
|
|
United Kingdom |
Analog Devices, GmbH
|
|
Germany |
Analog Devices, SAS
|
|
France |
Analog Devices, K.K.
|
|
Japan |
Analog Devices ApS
|
|
Denmark |
AudioAsics A/S
|
|
Denmark |
Analog Devices A.B.
|
|
Sweden |
Analog Devices (Finland) Oy
|
|
Finland |
Analog Devices SRL
|
|
Italy |
Analog Devices, GMBH
|
|
Austria |
Analog Devices Korea, Ltd.
|
|
Korea |
Integrant Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Korea |
Analog Devices, B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands |
Analog Devices Holdings, B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands |
Analog Devices Nederland, B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands |
Analog Devices (Philippines), Inc.
|
|
The Philippines |
Analog Devices Gen. Trias, Inc.
|
|
The Philippines |
Analog Devices Realty Holdings, Inc. (40% owned)
|
|
The Philippines |
Analog Devices Taiwan, Ltd.
|
|
Taiwan |
Analog Devices Hong Kong, Ltd.
|
|
Hong Kong |
Analog Devices Pty, Ltd.
|
|
Australia |
Analog Devices Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
|
Australia |
Analog Devices India Private Limited
|
|
India |
Analog Devices International Financial Services Limited
|
|
Ireland |
Analog Devices Israel, Ltd.
|
|
Israel |
Analog Devices (China) Co. Ltd.
|
|
China |
Analog Devices (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
|
|
China |
Analog Devices Canada, Ltd.
|
|
Canada |
Analog Devices S.L.
|
|
Spain |
ADI Micromachines, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Analog Devices International, Inc.
|
|
Massachusetts |
exv23
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 2-63561,
2-90023, 2-95495, 33-2502, 33-4067, 33-22604, 33-22605, 33-29484, 33-39851, 33-39852, 33-43128,
33-46520, 33-46521, 33-60642, 33-60696, 33-61427, 33-64849, 333-04771, 333-04819, 333-04821,
333-08493, 333-40222, 333-40224, 333-47787, 333-47789, 333-48243, 333-56529, 333-57444, 333-69359,
333-79551, 333-87055, 333-50092, 333-53314, 333-53828, 333-75170, 333-113510, 333-132409 and
333-156309, and Form S-3 Nos. 333-08505, 333-08509, 333-17651, 333-87053, 333-48928, 333-51530,
333-53660 and 333-160215) of Analog Devices, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports
dated November 24, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Analog Devices, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Analog
Devices, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2009.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 24, 2009
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jerald G. Fishman, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Analog Devices, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 24, 2009 |
/s/ Jerald G. Fishman
|
|
|
Jerald G. Fishman |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, David Zinsner, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Analog Devices, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 24, 2009 |
/s/ David A. Zinsner
|
|
|
David A. Zinsner |
|
|
Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analog Devices, Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Jerald G. Fishman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 24, 2009 |
/s/ Jerald G. Fishman
|
|
|
Jerald G. Fishman |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analog Devices, Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David Zinsner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 24, 2009 |
/s/ David A. Zinsner
|
|
|
David A. Zinsner |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|